Hoodwinked!

Even in 2005 I thought this movie looked uncanny.

Attached: Red.png (896x784, 1.19M)

it was good for the time

Shrek was four years earlier and looked leagues better. It was not good for its time, no.

>it was good for the time
No it wasn't. Even for the time it was absolute garbage-can CGI.

Why do I remember seeing a commercial for Hoodwinked 2 Burger King toys like a year before that movie released?

It was not.
It was a decently funny movie so you could ignore the awful animation.

The goat song was kino.

All I remember about this one was that rabbit was an asshole and he tried to conquer the world with some food franchise

It's a shame the animation isn't the best the plot is solid. Honestly if this was made in the 80s it would be a cult classic.

I remember finding it funny watching it as a kid and still to this day me and my siblings joke about the schnitzel guy

Who cares, it's funny as hell

didn't this have a budget of like $20 and a shot of rum for everyone on the crew?

I agree it always felt cheap but the characters were on point for the humor and it reminded me of a pg13 robot chicken.

Loved this lovie growing up. That being said
>a Weird Willy Weinstein cartoon

Smug bitch...

Y’know I actually really liked this movie when I was a kid.

i want to fuck that

I remember seeing that as a kid and being confused, there wasn't a trailer out when that commercial aired.

Apparently the movie was delayed but Burger King's toys were released around when the movie was supposed to release.

Meanwhile the production company sued Weinstein because of several factors, including not giving them a concrete release strategy and not contributing enough to the production budget

That's kind of the point.

>As the producers gained greater confidence in the film however, larger name actors were brought in.[6] Patrick Warburton was the first celebrity actor to join the film and did so purely out of a love for the script. Though Cory Edwards had originally envisioned the Wolf as sounding like a mixture between a young Chevy Chase and Bill Murray, he praised Warburton's performance, saying that he "made the Wolf his own character."[

This is a really underrated movie. Really funny, I saw it in theaters and loved it and I think it was on Netflix for a bit

>Dy-na-mi-te.
>Must be Italian!

I disagree, it was shit from top to bottom.

It's a genuinely great film, but I still blame it for being what I think was the first 3D CGI kid's movie to use the "radical granny" archetype.

2005 was the year where CG animated films began to suck imo, starting out with this one. This was the first one to lack any sort of character development, nuance or even a storytelling vision

Attached: robots-portada-l_cover.jpg (620x750, 209.59K)

test

Both were good movies I enjoyed as a kid. Was more of a Hoodwinked guy than a Robots guy though.

Robots was extremely shallow. Every CG film before that one had some substance. This one didn't. It's like they only cared about the animation and designs

I couldn't tell you a single detail about the plot but it had some damn memorable character designs. I also vaguely the metal looking pretty good for when it came out.

Hoodwinked is impressive in that it wasn't affiliated with either Pixar or Dreamworks.

But the fact remains is that its contemporaries were Over the Hedge and The Incredibles, both of which came out shortly before or after. Hoodwinked pales in comparison to both.

It's kinda funny how all of the academy award nominees from 2004 were cg films ( Incredibles, Shark Tale and Shrek 2 ) while all of the nominees from 2005 were either stop motion or anime. Sorta goes to show how low CG animation went that year. Other than maybe Madagascar, there were no standouts cg films

I do remember the plot, and it's a pretty bad one. Like, the worldbuilding is confusing and makes no sense, plenty of plot points go unexplained, and the characters have no development or nuance whatsoever. The romance is also pretty terrible and shoehorned in. Total step backwards from Ice Age

I never noticed it until it was pointed out to me, even though the first time I saw it was in 2010. I still don't think it looks that bad except for a few shots.

I remember liking it too. I think my mom rented this movie at Blockbuster for me and my sister, and it wasn't bad. Watched it on Netflix a while ago, and it held up pretty decently.