Soul vs Souless

Soul vs Souless.

Attached: Dexter's Lab.png (1350x847, 1.22M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3NFLN6W2I2s
youtube.com/watch?v=ZGb3LBAJ0po
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Which is which

We had this thread recently.

>116312400
Dunno, Zig Forums told me Dexter's lab was never good.

youtube.com/watch?v=3NFLN6W2I2s

youtube.com/watch?v=ZGb3LBAJ0po

That OG mom tho

Attached: 1591037060077.jpg (250x250, 14.56K)

That one episode where mandark puts dexter’s mom in a liquid tank gave me my first boner. I still don’t know why, it didn’t develop into any fetish or fantasy

Attached: iuyttyuiop.jpg (635x627, 75.02K)

Tommy's mom from Robotboy was better.

Attached: fghjklñ.jpg (871x648, 90.98K)

Attached: 78987654345678.png (740x600, 496.56K)

no she looks too much like him, it’s a boy’s head on a woman’s body

>she looks too much like him, it’s a boy’s head on a woman’s body.
That's hot.

That's Nicole Watterson.

True.

Still infinitely more soul than SU

Anything has more soul than that crap.

Based.

doubling Dee Dee's head size really makes her design garbage, like it's amazing how it's that simple to ruin an OK design.

I enjoy the aesthetic of the later but it wasn't as consistently funny.

>I enjoy the aesthetic of the later.
Cringe.

Man... I think I actually forgot how fucked up late Dexter looked. I remember the differences being much more subtle.
But even things that don't seem to be deliberate stylistic choices, like Dexter's Mom's face, seem fucked.

Yes, which is a deal breaker for me.

Attached: ppg-design.jpg (945x291, 120.68K)

>people enjoy things I do not enjoy
Crunge.

No, cringe.

Oh, when you put it so eloquently I guess I have no choice but to change my opinions.

>whataboutism

youtube.com/watch?v=xkqEd98zG1M

The surplus of shapely women in the original series automatically trumps the Savino era

Attached: 15634836559567.png (2332x1708, 3.51M)

How is Savino's actual style so good but he fucked up Genndy and Craig's so badly

Attached: LincolnLOud.png (1280x2050, 2.57M)