Comic 3x3 Thread

I see your tastes haven't changed

>Scottie Young
dropped.
Also, including two pieces from the same author shows amazing short-sightedness and a lack of knowledge.

Some comics I bought are coming in the mail so this could possibly change, sorry for not having the most deep and philosophical comics lol.

Attached: 35B5C916-5128-411A-9AFF-355073618E07.jpg (1800x1800, 885.71K)

We have an expert here! Tell us, how much does it pay to be a professional dickhead?

Why don't you read more comics?

>phoneposter
>casual

Attached: BeFunky-collage.jpg (3264x3264, 2.58M)

I would use my laptop more if the screen wasn’t fucked up.

Turtles, Cerebus and savage sword.

Swamp thing, hellblazer and sandman.

Toppi, wolf & cub and turok(would have done akira but I sold the few I had a few years ago for rent)

Attached: 393FC3AB-BC60-47A1-BD5C-C514D46D73F7.jpg (1536x1536, 812.69K)

Kaiju max?

Also casual imo.

Just rename your photos on your phone so people can’t tell if you’re worried about being called out by trolls.

I bet I read more than you, but I'm not being an asshole about it.

Replace Multiversity with John Ostrander's Suicide Squad and replace I Hate Fairyland with Marshall Law in that case. I'll make a new chart next time we have one of these threads.

Just make out already, fuck.

I get that my tastes are pretty mainstream, top of the "best graphic novel" lists - sure.

But Watchmen and Sandman have had such an impact on me, I doubt they'll ever move on. There's a reason they're so highly rated (n.b. - highly rated is not synonymous with "overrated").

Scott Pilgrim is on there for nostalgic reasons, more than anything.

Sandman IS overrated. It's practically trash. Don't worry, it'll phase out of your lists naturally as you read more.

You can’t go wrong with entertainment as easily with mainstream publishers as you can with the obscure and lesser known publishers.

Also mainstream publishers have insane art, almost every issue, some of the stuff gets web com-icy but read interviews with those writers and artists you like and they will drop title and artist names for the lesser known titles so you don’t have to rummage through them yourself.

90% of Indy and limited print published stuff is shit, so don’t let these hipster “I’m so underground” trolls influence what you enjoy.

This is bullshit, as you read more you’ll see how influential Neil was with sandman and love it more.

>other comics being influenced by it makes it less shit

Attached: 1471003206636.jpg (168x259, 18.18K)

It’s not shit, it’s just dated.

Don’t have modern standards of what new and innovative when you read old material and it won’t taste so bad.

You’re probably one of those people who says “why does everyone talk so much about the Kirby/Lee fantastic four? It’s shit”

My only assumption about someone having such a narrow perspective is that you read sequential at face value solely for mindless entertainment: You don’t study sequential or literary form in your leisure, you only read.

Attached: 121C508A-D823-446D-8D1A-A3203E38140D.jpg (3264x2448, 1.33M)

Don't spend so much time writing assumptions about people; it makes you look bad. I included Kirby's (it wasn't Lee's) FF in my chart.
Sandman is a lackluster work.

It only makes you look bad if you’re wrong.

Since you’re someone who writes Lee out of FF I’ll restate my assumption of your character: you bandwagon edgy opinions and then choose what you read-

>I, who go along with the consensus of sandman because it's the first comic I read, am the independent thinker here, and you the bandwagoner

Attached: Dragon blood.jpg (1252x485, 180.41K)

This is my chart.
Did you read swampthing and hellblazer before or after sandman?