I don't understand Batman's no kill code. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of the Joker

>I don't understand Superman's no kill code. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of the Lex Luthor.

Attached: Superman-ComicPuzzles.jpg (1400x700, 207.34K)

Because it's not logical, it's just an excuse to reuse villains. Once Batman has turned them in, it's on the system to kill them. The law would have put down these criminals the second or third time it happens.

Just accept it as a necessary evil of serialized cape shit and move on. No need for pointless ethical debates

Batmanchild wants to play forever and he can't do that if he kills his playmates.

>I don't understand Fantastic 4 no kill code. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of Doctor Doom

Attached: Fantastic_Four_(Marvel_Comics_characters).jpg (250x347, 75.38K)

can we please not have this thread anymore? it should be an instant ban.

also if you want to read about a vigilante killing criminals then read the punisher.

>>I don't understand Fantastic 4 no kill code. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of Doctor Doom
B-B-B-But MUH DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY!1!

>implying Spider-Man can kill Carnage
>implying Spider-Man who already have a bad rep wants to get murder charges in his back
Batman is a billionaire that can get a team of lawyers to get him free, Spider-Man is a fucked up average Joe that struggles to pay rent.

When it comes right down to it, it's a matter of realising he doesn't have the right. He's already a vigilante. If you ignore how silly comics are and that prison never sticks, because if you aren't willing to do that then the argument is easily defeated anyway due to deaths never *ever* sticking, there are legal systems in place and Batman fights to uphold social order and not tear it down.

>I don't understand X-men no kill code. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of Magneto

Attached: X-men.jpg (183x275, 18.17K)

>I don't understand flashes no kill code. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of zoom.

>a team that get its funds via patents, investors and fame
>kill a foreign chief of state
Bad for business

I mean, not from lack of trying really. Most would assume you would die from being flung into fucking space on a meteor

Batman killed people in BvS and you people gave him shit for it.
Cursed if you do, cursed if you don't.

Nice try but Spider-Man straight up rescued Carnage from Venom because "killing is wrong"

i dont understand aquaman no kill rule. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of black manta.

If Ellon Musk killed whoever is the president of Latvia, he would only get richer.

>Zig Forums is one person

Cops shouldn't kill any random criminals but I wouldn't exactly be unhappy if someone did to Junko Furuta killers the very same things they did to her.
Joker is a comic equivalent of those guys, if not worse.

>Charles mind raped Magneto once, reducing him to a vegetable
>Scott blew up Apocalypse once
>also that time when Magneto died in the Asteroid M or something
The X-Men dont follow a hard no kill code.

There are Marvel heroes that have killed more than Joker. If they are allowed to live, so is Jokah.

>I don't understand Flash no kill code. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of Zoom

Attached: 147e79b1134e29c06887f1ddf3023961.png (833x1280, 1.91M)

superheroes do heroic shit, killing people isnt heroic. if anything, batman should put joker in a mental hospital so he can be treated.

Spiderman has literally stopped a guy whose family was murdered by carnage from killing him. What a fucking dick

I don't understand Deredevil no kill code. The world would unquestionably be better off without the likes of Kingpin

Attached: ZY60GoT.jpg (549x835, 113.3K)

Oh... right, that time when Firestar nearly fried Carnage and Venom was almost getting an orgasm all the while cheering her? Or it was another time? Anyway, your right. Peter is a retard, i concede.

in his defense these yellow fucks just come back. they don't care.

Now they don't have to write new characters, they can just have Joker do everything. Sometimes they make new ones, point is that they don't have to.

Didn't he tried? Also didnt he basically ruined the guy to the point that he was harmless? The beef between Kingpin and Daredevil wasn't supposed to be personal to the point of both trying to fuck the personal life of the other in a fucked up way beyond mere murder?

Punisher is a big killer, no? Like, the god of edgelords and all, right?

How come all Marvel villains are still alive and well and kicking, if the Punisher "does what needs to be done"?

I've personally never had an issue with Batman killing in the movies. It's an established part of his main comic interpretation and history that he doesn't and shouldn't, but I don't hold other continuities to that. Burtonverse Batman is probably my favourite live-action/movie Batman and he couldn't give a fuck, most of his kills are self defence.

Attached: vlcsnap-2020-06-27-03h00m13s251.png (1920x1080, 653.29K)

Really? Seriously, that's fucked up. Peter is a moron. Who wrote that shit?

i dont understand op sucking cocks rule. the board would be unquestionably better off without the likes of faggots like OP

This is retarded, he actually did kill Eobard in canon.

Also Eobard is effectively immortal anyway due to salesforce shenanigans.

Ok so why doesn't anyone ELSE fucking kill him? Why does it HAVE to be Batman?

Frank is just a guy with a gun. Can he off people like Ultron, Titania, Abomination, Sandman, Molecule man, Magneto?

>How come all Marvel villains are still alive and well and kicking, if the Punisher "does what needs to be done"?
What's he realistically going to do to Apocalypse or even Sabretooth? Especially before the X-Men are there? Punisher fucks around NY mainly, most of NY's heroes get to the villains first.

Killing people is plenty heroic, if the person needs killing. Superheroes don't kill because they'd have no villains left.

>Frank is just a guy with a gun.
Wouldn't Batman be the same if he started killing?

If a "Batman that kills" would be as inefficient at it as Punisher, then I don't really see the point.

I agree, anybody can kill the Joker... Batman must rape the Joker, only him and nobody else!

There is countless Marvel villains that are defenseless against a sniper riffle.

Yeah, sure, kill a major crime lord who keeps smaller gangs in check. What could ever possibly go wrong?
You could've said Bullseye or Purple Man and you wouldn't have sounded like a retard.

>Wouldn't Batman be the same if he started killing?
Basically. He'd be a guy with a gun and a multibillion dollar company.

Frank is a hobo that lives in a van and always on the run, Batman is a rich boy with bazillions in account.

I've never seen Punisher struggling for money.

And is this what the world needs? Billionaires who decide who lives and who dies?

>Frank is just a guy with a gun

Bullshit, he defeated entire factions with hundreds of members at straight up combat, he's an one man army with feats far beyound the best real life soldier in history.

>I've never seen Punisher struggling for money.
Ok. So what?

I read once that is the reason that the Shocker tries to keep a low profile, so he can avoid guys like the Punisher coming after him.

So it doesn't like much of an excuse for his inefficient ways.

He literally isn't allowed to. People would be pissed of he started killing off Daredevil and spideys rogues gallery. They want to keep using those characters.

>superheroes start killing people
>turns into full bore fascism

you really want a group of superpowered beings taking over the world and killing you for anything they say is wrong?

Saying something about person A is not an argument or excuse for/against person B. Read better, faggot.

>He literally isn't allowed to.
So Punisher isn't allowed to off fucking Bullseye, but Batman should kill the Joker?

With the resources of bigger orgs, sure. But before pull the trigger ask this question: who gets the last hit?

The first victim of the villain? Sure but they are still human and they just paint a target on their backs

The cops? All cops are bastards and enabling bastard behavior is something not even the Punisher approves of.

The vigilante heroes? Sure, let's make the next gen of heroes think murder is fine and be less role models and more like masked sociopaths.

Now if the villain dies in a spur of a moment mistake no one would care. But murder is murder and you need to have a certain mindset to carrying it out.

Attached: NoKillRule.jpg (600x2339, 677.83K)

OK, then go out and start killing criminals. Funny how the people who keep saying Batman should be allowed to kill people without judicial process are too pussy to do it themselves.

Agreed.

Attached: vlcsnap-2020-07-18-19h43m01s333.png (1920x1072, 848.61K)

No you absolute fucking retard, I'm saying cape heroes in general don't kill their villains because the company wants to keep using them forever. Even punisher, that's why he fights so many generic mob bosses. There isn't a logical reason punisher couldn't kill bullseye or Fisk.