Why are sexy girls in comics and video games bad again? Because it triggers insecurity in some women?

Why are sexy girls in comics and video games bad again? Because it triggers insecurity in some women?

Attached: 4552236-2386375362-RS197.jpg (426x640, 106.06K)

Something something misogyny.

>and video games
Go back.

A minuscule but loud minority is triggered over nothing, shitting the party for every normal person ever

there's nothing wrong with having beautiful women and handsome men in stories, video games, etc. If the story is only sex appeal, I'd just go to r34 instead

You just answered yourself retard. Next time try a better argument for a thread, we're not here to give you brownie points. Faggot.

Gay and soiboys are quick to whine about cheesecake on female characters too, cheesecake is delicious tho. I think the negativity towards sexy girls should be called out more as just flat out negativity, there's no need to reason with them.

>Because it triggers insecurity in some women?
yee

>Because it triggers insecurity in some women?
Mainly this

I personally don't like it because when designing a sexy half naked character, they don't really need to try anymore with personalities, writing, plot.

But Carol was an actual character back in the day. So was Peeg. And she-hulk.

You just never read those comics and believed they were one dimensional like they are now.

The good old days, when people tried their best on everything. But now we know what corners to cut.

They don't listen to Arakawa

Attached: DYlroReU0AE9NCZ.jpg (1200x1089, 281.44K)

What a chad

Stacy, Hiromu Arakawa is a Lady

But they don't know what corners to cut. Otherwise they might make good comics still.

Yes.
Attractive, in shape women in various states of scantily cladness don't exist in the real world apparently because they've been deemed unrealistic by hamplanets. We wouldn't want anyone's insecurities brought out.

The craziest part is if these women only looked at instagram or even the side of Twitter they never visit the would see every photo people traced for most of these lolll

Most people here are just going to circlejerk the same oppinion so, lets play devils advocate:
Is not that there can't be sexy women, is that they were the only type of women, while you had form mens characters like The Thing that was all about being a hero and a great person despise what happen to his good looks. Also, too many times it came as an excuse to avoid writing a personality or actual character, you may as well put a sexy blowdoll that it would have the same impact on the story, so you can blame shit writers for making the assosiation of cheesecake=sexy prop (instead of character that happens to be sexy)

Easy cop out to make a shallow character. I also hate when these faggots just shove sex appeal in my face in order to get me to read/view their shallow content.

I've had some people completely turn around their opinion on FMA when they learned that. It's very strange seeing someone go from "I love it" to "it's cliché garbage" after a single sentence and google search.

When you are a miserable failure at getting laid, women become the Enemy.
Better to think they are actually subverting you than to accept that you are doing it poorly.

Alot of people are just shallow

>Because it triggers insecurity in some women?
Yes.

That's because the primary audience of comic books (heterosexual males) doesn't care if the The Thing is "hot" or not.
>Is not that there can't be sexy women, is that they were the only type of women,
But then you still have to explain: exactly what is your vested interest in having other types of women, if it's not to make female readers feel better about themselves?
COULD comics have other types? Sure. But is it a problem if they don't? The answer to that is no and no one has managed to convince me otherwise.

>Why are sexy girls in comics and video games bad again?
They aren't. There are literally thousands of comic and vidya females that are sexy. Shit, the character you yourself have pictured there is in print. The only thing that has taken a hit is the trend of putting literally every female character in the most revealing costume possible, regardless of their character.

>scale bikini

Offers no protection, whatsoever.

Not the guy you responded to but I just think it's interesting in general. We can take the sex appeal out of the equation. Supermodel chicks are fine for cheesecake and being appealing to the eye but it's also fine to have chicks like Amanda Waller and She-Hulk to add some variety there.

eat shit tranny

>use armor materials that cover everything but the most vital areas of your body

Why bother? It's a waste of armor and you're not even wearing padding underneath it anyways, so it's already uncomfortable as fuck.

Not an argument, incel.

because you let the left win the ideological war. its your fault.

Were you expecting to get answers from women here?

no idea?
i really don't understand it
its not hard, just DO WHAT YOU WANT TO DO!

jesus
draw huge tits
sexy poses
big asses

just don't listen to people who WONT READ OR PLAY YOUR SHIT IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Attached: blackcat-1_1280x1280.jpg (730x1114, 212.83K)