Was it really that bad?
Was it really that bad?
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
It was so hated even the furfags didn't make hardly any porn of it.
no, but still probably not as good as people who say "it wasn't that bad" will say.
The issue is that when "it's looney tunes but edgy" gets spread around, that's how people know for it even if they never actually watched it, and to most people something being edgy automatically has a negative relation to its quality.
And yeah, it was comparatively edgy, but some people get the sense that it was devoid of looneyness.
If the very first thing I think on seeing a show's premise is, "Why does this exist?", then the show is a failure from the start.
It's like a mix of teen titans and sonic the hedgehog. I liked it ngl, but then again I am a furry.
The first season was genuinely bad. Mainly due to the generic supervillains who didn't have anything to do with Looney Tunes lore. There were also weird humanized versions of characters like Foghorn Leghorn and Pepe le Pew who seemed like very forced cameos.
Second season improved to reach mediocre status. The show started introducing more Looney Tunes characters as villains, which were much better than season 1's villains. The theme song of season 2 was rather strange though.
Ehh, some godawful ideas end up catching on and being enjoyed by plenty of people. Just look at Hawaiian pizza, racism, good deal of pop songs, and hazbin hotel.
>godawful ideas
>hazbin hotel
based
I watched this as a dumb kid, so the best I remember are vague action scenes, funny animals, and team bickering, so because I absolutely do not want to rewatch this show, I'm going to link to a random guy on twitter who apparently did that just out of nowhere last week, and piggyback on what he says
twitter.com
>too many ideas that could be interesting, which is probably why some people remember it fondly if at all, but in the end the show never takes them anywhere
>any premise can be met with a "why does this exist" and succeed beyond expectations, it's a matter of execution which this had done haphazardly
>no real character development, usual case of status quo dictates that characters are going to act certain ways even if they learn not to
>keeps making random villains and plots that don't matter outside the episode
>random villains don't even have anything to do with looney tunes, or if they do they're weird knock off versions, like they couldn't risk making them look too much like the real thing
>they apparently did nothing with the main character and the main girl and teasing a romance? That's the most basic thing you do to get people invested, and is the main reason why star vs stuck around
in all honesty, no
the only thing that i remember being that edgy was the art, but the story and characters were generally okay
i still laugh at people who claim this is the 2nd coming of the anti christ for trying something differing, but praise looney toons show even though the general change to the formula in that was for the worse
Nah it was alright
>furry bait
Yeah it is, I'd totally love a reboot in a more furry style rather than edgy 2000s style which is still good.
It's reverse Teen Titans Go. It took a cartoony joke filled property and transformed it into an action show with quips. At that point they might as well have made it a completely different set of characters but they did it because they wanted to bank on the brand recognition while making the characters cool for the kids at the time.
Not really but it fails to be a comedy show and as an action show. If anything it's a mediocre parody of Batman Beyond. It fails, but not by much
>muh looney tunes too serious
No
It was remarkably OK, I liked it mostly because character interactions however the action wasn't terrible.
Tails Gets Trolled is unironically better.
It doesn't seem inherently terrible but I don't know what the hook would have been to get people to watch.
"Looney Tunes but now they're superheroes?" I ain't buying.
I never gave it the time of day myself. Just didn't seem worth it.
They got around to it given its status
They are really into Tech and Rev
>>they apparently did nothing with the main character and the main girl and teasing a romance?
Probably was supposed to happen but I think the writers then realized the implications of Ace and Lexi being Bugs and Lola's Grandchildren respectively and dialed back
youtube.com
Thread reminded me.
It was my favorite show when I was six. I have no doubt that watching it today would shatter my fondness for the show though.
If this show came out today some of them would be faggots
You just KNOW they would've put Rev and Tech together
I'd be okay with that.
i literally remember only a single scene from this show and it was something along the lines of
>rev does something nice for tech
>i could kiss you if you werent a road runner
>or a male
Gotta love how this show came out the same year as Shadow the Hedgehog and Revenge of the Sith. 2005 was peak edgyness
The two parody flashes left more of an impact than the show itself.
Those were who I was referring two
They are those characters that just scream the writers wanted to make them gay but they couldn't since it was a mid-2000s kids show
>i could kiss you if you werent a road runner
>or a male
youtube.com
Same energy
Exactly. Child pornography and having sex with children is great, but when it gets highly factory farmed and commercialized where every guy with a few thousand dollars can go to Comet Ping Pong and order a cheese pizza, it loses its luster.
For what it was, not really, but the sheer dissonance caused by its central concept and source material pretty much meant it would need to absolutely SHINE in every other aspect for it to be engaging.
It didn't, so it just came off as off-puttingly weird