How did you went from this to something so bland like steven universe?

how did you went from this to something so bland like steven universe?

Attached: sugar.png (495x354, 205.34K)

Do you really don't know how animation works?
This thing was an animated short made by a single person in months.
Not a series that needed episodes for months.
In a series you need to pay people for drawing and animating, and it's not only you to draw the characters but also others.

>steven universe
>bland
how?
SU is full of unique designs, from gems, fusions and corrupted monsters all the way to the townies.
Don't flate cheap indie animation with whatever the opposite of bland is.

Attached: laughing_lapises.png (817x594, 155.49K)

All of her pre-Steven work looks ugly as shit

Attached: simpsons09.jpg (680x700, 189.52K)

cope hader

It's an acquired taste

>user doesn't know what artstyle is

Attached: img.4plebs.jpg (306x306, 17.66K)

I know that Steven universe takes time to make, but I meant to the style of it, not the quality of the animation shithead

is fine to be fair, but compared to his old work is totally inferior

yes it is, and I like it that way

Attached: images.jpg (204x247, 15.02K)

That's why john k liked her so much

>but I meant to the style of it, not the quality of the animation
Sugar didn't draw all SU herself, she made the concept and others stylized it for animation.

i gotta admit, you win, i'll get you next time user

Attached: NkQ5PpJ.gif (450x295, 277.64K)

Oh sorry, is this one better. You big fucking baby

Attached: Art style for fags.png (874x893, 124.3K)

Ugly =/= bad

Her early work have an amazing art style

No bro
Is bad

Nah man
It good

Reminder that the redesign from the pilot was 100% Sugar's decision, not mandates from CN to make it more simple for a budget.

Attached: 234253453.png (736x842, 62.53K)

ugly, but in a soulful, appealing way

I love her old style

She makes John K. look like Bruce Timm in comparison.

ugly character designs, but also better animation and generally more detail in other parts

>This thing was an animated short made by a single person in months.
So you're arguing an animation by a single person with no budget looks better than an animation done by a crew with hundreds of people and millions of dollars? Shouldn't that be the opposite, retard?

>So you're arguing an animation by a single person with no budget looks better than an animation done by a crew with hundreds of people and millions of dollars?
Yes.
Independent animators don't have deadlines or need to send their works to be drawn, colored, animated frame by frame by others for saving time.
If you knew how tiring the animation work is for the artists you would understand why off-model is so common, it's relaxing.

The style is too hard for the people they hire to emulate. Too many people land jobs in animation because of the people they know and not based on their actual ability to do their job well.

Why else do you think they dumb down their designs and simplify them to literal basic shapes in modern cartoons?

Attached: 1376514475055.gif (245x181, 310.97K)

The pilot looked more in line with her other work but I'm assuming it got canned in favor of the style we got for budgetary reasons.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 139.14K)

I actually liked that comic

D'oh well never mind then.

It has wierd appeal to It.

Many things: time mostly, the fact that is not Lauren drawing every frame, the kid appeal (Networks want safe stuff), the common limits of digital animation as a work tool, etc...
A master animator like Richard Williams spend years trying to finish a single 90 min movie and not even he managed to do it.

@117567647
An ugly artstyle

The wrong friends and company.

Having a shit taste is bad enough but @ is the proof you don't belong here

I still remember Lars calling the CGs hot girls in the pilot. And Opal being referred to as a giant woman. Then I don’t recall the gems ever being referred to as girls or women ever again.