80's/90's cartoon character porn

>80's/90's cartoon character porn
>The character is on model (like pic related of Peg)
>Modern flash calarts character porn
>The design is so off model to the point of ridiculousness - especially when they don't have hips, ass or breasts remotely resembling that. (like pic related of some cat lady from Gumball)

Is drawing some weird monstrosity of what a sexy woman is and placing it onto an unappealing calarts character design the only way autistic fans of flash cartoons can sexualize their characters?

Attached: flash cartoons suck.jpg (960x1450, 307.27K)

shitty thread complaining about dumb shit

Animators aren't allowed to have fun anymore so us coomer artists have to communicate telepathically.

Attached: Nicole.png (269x613, 159.25K)

Now compare this to what they could get away with in the 90's

Attached: 135792d2-5e07-420c-bc85-e2da61bc18ea.jpg (1280x1063, 167.89K)

Sexualizing cartoons intended for children is wrong.

Adults make the cartoons, kids watch the cartoons and then they grow up to lewd the cartoons.

Attached: dfymfiZ.png (695x499, 355.9K)

Fpbp. I don't care if the drawing is drastically off model or not. If the image is sexy to me, then I am going to be beat my meat to it, and move on

Attached: 5.jpg (564x568, 48.58K)

Lewding cartoons is not growing up, it's refusing to let go of your childhood and imprinting your ever-growing sexuality onto it. Sorry you're broken :///////

How does sexuality grow?

in my PANTS ;))))))

In the heart.

>Personality goes a very long way.

Of course it does but, waifuing and coming aren't the same thing.

OOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 139.8K)

i'd be more concerned about terrible that Nicole's face is, jesus what the hell happened to her mouth?

Why?

Only if the porn involves some semblance of story, then maybe, depending on what it was. Otherwise, personality is not much of a factor. It's nice to see but not necessary. I am not going to bothered to see a character I like act slutty in some drawn smut.

Yeah the thread and our discussion reminded me of my old pasta and it still rings true.

80's and 90's female characters were attractive. Modern cartoon females are not.

Why does this artist nuke his shit so often? He nuked the fuck out of his tumblrs back in the day.

Attached: c408d0c4a3089aa8db414a8164f41b4e.jpg (405x1104, 173.93K)

Why the fuck are people booing him he's right.

If the character isn't acting like themselves, what in the actual shitting fuck is the point? If I want a slut, I'll fap to a slutty character. If I want to fap to a cute character, I fucking can't because fucking EVERYONE draws shit that way. I can fap to Morrigan from Darkstalkers easy because she acts all slutty. But now I want to fap to Felicia, who acts cutesy and happy, but what do you fucking know - abso-fucking-lutely no one draws her, or anyone else that way. The porn industry is run on the id of the lazy and the braindead. Theres a small, minuscule hanful of artists who break the mold, but half of those will only do so for comission, and the other half are buried under a sea of shit that runs deeper than the fucking marianas. Everyone who ever finds porn for the first time will only find the same shit that's been in vogue for thirty fucking years, which they then acclimate to and maintain over the course of theri consumption. the machine is self-sustaining at this point, and it is fucking depressing.

>lol umad
Yeah, maybe at one point, but no I don't even have the energy to get mad anymore. All I feel is immeasurable disappointment and hostile, judgmental disgust.

Attached: nuclear.jpg (400x399, 18.24K)

>Modern cartoon females are not.
You are weak.

Something about personal shit affecting him. Big shame, I remember him in the gumball talkback threads.

This always happens, the original material is irrelevant beyond being a point of reference

Attached: 1321073313881.png (682x523, 334.64K)

Attached: EQEGtlUU0AAzzNu.jpg (1440x1080, 366.15K)

Attached: EQEGorZU0AAIRu9.jpg (1600x1003, 134.63K)

I hate off model porn. It doesn't have to be 1:1, some artistic liberty is allowed of course but making their body /face completely different makes me think this guy just wanted to draw a character he wanted and put a popular face on the body to cash in.
This.

Attached: 1597443010641.jpg (2000x1038, 456.35K)

Why is it ok when it's Peg but a weird monstrosity when it's Nicole?

artist fucked up the face and forgot the tail

>>correct anatomy is sexualizing

Off-model isn't as bothersome to me as long as it isn't too egregious.
It's out of character shit that makes me wish i could spit through the screen.

Attached: planktonne.jpg (464x464, 39.32K)

>Get away with

What are they getting away with?

The hyper sensitivity to anything that could be interpreted by someone out there as sexual is part of what ruined cartoons