Now I will watch your movie

I did it all buster, I did it ALL.

Attached: Brutal 1482415646001.jpg (400x400, 35.31K)

youtube.com/watch?v=mZxaaq2lBTg

Spotted the pedo

probably true considering fbi has the largest collection of cheese pizza on earth

People assume depiction mean endorsement. That's the unsolvable problem of the movie,its point is that your daughter probably shouldnt twerk like they do so it's solution is to show little girls twerking. And a lot of people didnt think it's a good idea
For example,am i posting CP by posting this Google link where i searched "little girls twerking" ? Am i at faul for pointing out it's fucked up or should we instead blame parents never educating their fucking kids
google.com/search?q=litte girls twerking&rlz=1C1AOHY_frFR712FR712&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwih-trNuqrsAhVFCxoKHfw8D1UQ_AUoAXoECAsQAw&biw=1152&bih=751

Yes, the main complaint with the movie is that they used actual child actors for all the shit that happens in the movie.
If they were cartoon rabbits it would be uncomfortable but people wouldn't have nearly as much a problem.
They'd either have to be drawn as ugly goblins like Bigmouth or Anthropomorphic to make them less human.

Ok pedo

>People assume depiction mean endorsement.
except netflix did endorsed sexualisation of childrens, dumbass

Why is Yin drawn so grotesque-ly?

user, go sit in the corner and think about what you did.

>Panini moggs the other three
Accurate

Netflix didnt produce the movie.They made a shitty marketing campaign
The problem is no one assume good faith on the part of the director.However,i do agree that "Cuties" is a textbook example of a false good idea.Showing little girls twerking prove your point it's fucked up but the downsize is that you made little girls twerk,it's a snake eating its own tail

Because her original design was grotesque. She's the worst of the pink rabbits.

This is actually WHY "Cuties" would've worked better as a cartoon, using anthropomorphic animals in place of actual children. You could play it absolutely straight, showing underage cartoon bunny girls doing things underage human children SHOULDN'T be doing to get your point across.

Even better, since people naturally assume
>cartoon animals = show for kids
they'll want their kids to watch it, which would end up creating a WHOLE LOT of uncomfortable parent-child discussions.

>People assume depiction mean endorsement.
The marketing alone was endorsement of the real thing. It doesn't even matter what the actual content is if the primary means of exposure is literally sexualizing children at face value.

I like your argument but i'm going to tell you an anecdote that happened in France over Sausage Party.That this part of the comment that made me remember it
>they'll want their kids to watch it, which would end up creating a WHOLE LOT of uncomfortable parent-child discussions.
Sausage Party was released at a time where my country was tearing itself apart over gay marriage. Religius nutjobs got out of the woods and seriously used Sausage Party as an argument that children were lured under flase pretense to see a food orgy
eater.com/2016/12/15/13968142/sausage-party-movie-ban-france
My point is,i think even if it was a cartoon,the same accusations of "PEDO" would have happened

Not even, her original design is minimalist. You can complain about that, but it wasn't "grotesque". This redesign is original-movie-Sonic tier.

Why are pedos so in denial?
Just admit you want to sexualize children, instead of pretending that Cuties isn't inherently doing just that.
Since I'm going to get banned for this post anyways: Suck my dick, faggot mod.

>My point is,i think even if it was a cartoon,the same accusations of "PEDO" would have happened
I see that as a feature, not a bug.

I remember during Gamergate,some guy on Twitter went under fire for screencaping a CP thread on 8chn to prove that the website was a piece of shit.Instead,he got called a pedo himself.This is the exact same situation with Cuties in my opinion. You cant point out this shit exist without being accused of being a pedo yourself.

>"Muh shitty marketing!"
>Implying that the movie itself isn't pedophilia normalization
>Implying that Netflix hasn't made pedophilia normalization shows/movies before

>some guy on Twitter went under fire for screencaping a CP thread on 8chn to prove that the website was a piece of shit.Instead,he got called a pedo himself.
Gee, is it because he was the one who uploaded said CP at eight-chan to "prove" that said site allows CP and he got exposed for it? And somehow authorities never questioned or arrested him for possessing and sharing CP.

>Implying that the movie itself isn't pedophilia normalization
It's not.It's done clumisily as hell,i'm not denying it and i dont think Cuties was a good idea but at its core it's a denunciation.It's Nabokoff tier shit but it's not intended to be masturbation material
>Implying that Netflix hasn't made pedophilia normalization shows/movies before
My bad,it's not an implication here. I genuinely dont know of those other controversies you speak of

Imagine doing a lot of sexual commissions and fapping together with an FBI agent

Attached: 1602252640518.png (191x246, 24.98K)

I dont know user. I just said i vaguely remembered that shit, Gamergate was such a shitshow i probably didnt bother to remember every finer point since every side was flinging shit at each other

Not an argument.Hush,the adults are talking