L o l ?

l o l ?

Attached: EkakYNVWkAEGcxw.jpg (1250x1250, 902.89K)

based

Why represent unbacked rumors with shoddy origins as an actual truth?

Because they've already been verified as being true, both by other outlets as well as people who some of the emails were originally sent to.

>Because they've already been verified as being true
They haven't.
Heck, it's even more pathetic that the source is supposedly from a "found laptop", whereas it was actually leaked by Russian hack.

I don't get it

It wasn't found, it was from a repair shop Hunter dropped it off at, and never bothered to pick up for over a year because he's a retarded crackhead, legally making it the property of the repair shop.
>muh russia
Now that is legitimately pathetic.
Did the KGB do deepfakes of Hunter's sex tape as well?

There has been recent rumor about a "found laptop" incriminating Biden's son, but it's basically Q-user level of conspiracy, and some are complaining that it's not fair it's not all over the news.

Biden's son dropped off his laptap at a repair store a year ago, never picked it up, and the owner made a backup of the hard drive and sold it to someone on Trump's team before the FBI confiscated the laptop, and they've been releasing more information from it every day for the past two days, that implicated his father Joe Biden in international money laundering (as well as selfies of Hunter smoking crack).

Reminds me of Assassin's Creed.

>It wasn't found, it was from a repair shop Hunter dropped it off at
this story lack any conformation.

>Now that is legitimately pathetic.
It's where the available clues seems to actually point out
>Did the KGB do deepfakes of Hunter's sex tape as well?
i dunno, did they fake the pee-tapes?

Biden Hunter is a crackhead, possibly CP too
CNN and Twitter are trying to kill the story to protect Joe Biden

Attached: 1602515097010.jpg (885x516, 77.04K)

>dropped off his laptop at a repair store a year ago
Even this aspect of the story lack any kind of sensible confirmation.

>CNN and Twitter are trying to kill the story
Not perpetuating an unbacked conspiracy theory is not the same as "killing", you know?

Also be aware, Biden shills are going hard on the "it's not real" angle by appealing to the authority of fucking Snopes and such
Zig Forums is counter-memeing them with DEBUNKED

They have perpetuated every unbacked conspiracy theory against Trump, and went into complete shutdown mode over this report backed by actual evidence.
You don't do that with something that's "le debunked". It was a completely unprecedented move on both Twitter and Facebook's part, going so far as to begin shutting down government accounts.

How are people still so retarded they can reflexively vomit RUSSIA on demand, when the Mueller Report revealed nothing that even impeachment-hungry Democrats could use for impeachment? The Mueller Report was unprecedented in size and scope. The fact it didn't turn up even non-related dirt on Trump is insane.

What available clues?

>pee-tapes

Literal OG fake news.

Enjoy playing into China's hands and letting a rust bucket economy boogeyman live rent free in your heads. I wish you were smarter.

Because hecking Snoperino and Redditino said so

Attached: 1602931905708.jpg (1024x852, 114.55K)

That's already been confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt, including the demand from the FBI to repossess that exact laptop.

>Fine people
>All Mexicans are rapists
>Russian bounties
>Lie that Trump has never disavowed white supremacy

>How are people still so retarded they can reflexively vomit RUSSIA on demand
I honestly don't know, because the people who say it don't believe it, and the people they tell it to obviously know it's a lie.
Everyone in the room knows it's not true, so what's the point of even saying it?

Look at this CNN intern

>, Biden shills are going hard on the "it's not real" angle
Oh no, people treating an unbacked conspiracy theory as such? the nerve of those people.

>by appealing to the authority of fucking Snopes
I don't think you know what an "appeal to authority" fallacy is

Relying on the expertise of someone or a groupo, based on actual research works is not committing an "appeal to authority". Appeal to authority is when someone is in command whose word is taken as word of god, simply because he is powerful.

If you think Snope's investigation are shoddy, you have to tell us why.

this isn't Zig Forums related so fuck off.

Pic related it's Zig Forums related

Attached: tumblr_mb6xu1mEcn1qet1tyo1_500.gif (500x372, 485.21K)

ChadYes

Attached: Wojakisshit.png (1111x713, 599.28K)

>us

>every unbacked conspiracy theory against Trump,
They weren't unbacked and not just conspiracy.

Face it, man, you were fooled by a con-man and not even a good one.

>he says after leftypol tried a raid with wojaks
didn't end so well for them tho

>Zig Forums is counter-memeing them with DEBUNKED
>it's not true because I am memeing you are a $oy
Wow, galaxian brain, there. Such demonstration.
so much rational.

Eat shit,wojak

Attached: sgb.png (1634x976, 1.57M)

>LOL, is this how far we've walked it back now?
>Not the original "RUSSIA HACKED THE ELECTIONS!"?
Russia committed hack and paid bribes and provided shaddy fund for election campaign during the 2016 elections. It's as simple as that. There s no walking back, there.

>People have been thrown in jail you know?
Absolutely none of them for "colluding with russia"

They literally were.

>The fact it didn't turn up even non-related dirt on Trump is insane.

But it did find dirt. Trump’s camp was been caught lying several times and numerous people got arrested and went to jail as a direct result of the investigation. The issue in regards to Trump was that Barr poisoned the well by making skewed pro-Trump proclamations before the report was officially released, so it muddled the entire results when one side was already gaslight to believe it exonerated Trump, and Mueller was such a process deferring bureaucrat that he wouldn’t make public statements to fight Barr properly, because it would be improper, and he also deferred to the practice that you cannot indict a sitting president so it was left up to Congress to impeach him. The reason Dems didn’t use it to impeach was simply because corporate Dems are spineless sheep and the stuff was so byzantine and hard to sell to your average American idiot in a catchphrase that they thought it wouldn’t work. And that was the same reason the eventual articles of impeachment about Ukraine was so ridiculously narrow. Dems bungled it, and the Republicans voted based on party lines rather than based on the evidence.