Based Dilbert man

Except it's not true, because news organisations tried looking into it and it was deemed too sketchy to be reported at the time because they couldn't verify the claims and Rudy Giuliani is not credible as a source. Fox News of all people went "yeah, no" when approached, that should tell you something.

And now that it's been out and people have poured enormous resources into trying to check it, turns out there's literally nothing there that shows Joe Biden doing anything criminal. Nothing backs the claims being made. It's amazingly incompetent and desperate attempt at doing Hillary's emails again.

True or not the American far left is demonstratively and undeniable satanic.

Wow, it's fuckin nothing.

>news organisations tried looking into it
l
o
l

The FBI confirmed that Hunter is currently being investigated over the exact same information from his laptop.

>True or not, here's outlandish claim
Not how that works, Scotty boy.

Not what any of that means. So this is the power of American literacy.

It was a big enough deal that Dems tried to impeach Trump for even looking into it. It's too late to say "lol who cares" after that fiasco.

>investigated

Attached: db9b0x0-1682a5c8-4a67-48b7-b548-b1e0c3d96c6a.jpg (960x882, 59.41K)

A broken clock is right twice a day.

>Dems tried to impeach Trump for even looking into it
Coo coo. Coo coo.

Fuck the jews. The jews are a criminal people. They mutilate their children. They're murderous, thieving, lying bastards. They made up the Holocaust, there's not a word of truth to it.

There are problems that need to be dealt with immediately, or else the long term systemic problems will shift from 'establishing good governance and journalistic integrity' to 'how much longer past expiration date can we eat these MRE's before getting sick in a way the municipal shaman can't fix'? This little sitcom was fun, great four-year run, time to let it die gracefully while most American households still have electricity.

Did ol Tucker ever find those damning documents, or are they still lost in the mail?

There isn't anything to report. It's supposedly lost in the mail.

Most Americans aren't Californians, so we do have electricity.

>Dilbert thread
>usually started by someone blindly supporting Trump or someone assmad about Adams and/or Trump
>If politically-related comment and/or cartoon the thread turns into political shitflinging
>Anti-Adams poster keeps trying to argue Adams is always wrong for Metacritic or something he wrote proves that he's a nutcase or creationist or something, but some guy points out flaws in the Anti-Adams' guy's posts, then Anti-Adams guy accuses other posters of being Adams because Adams used a sockpuppet on Metacritic
>Zig Forums starts aggressively arguing about how Trump is never wrong
>Someone gets upset and starts posting Dilbert cartoons with some pithy remark against them or Adams, possibly because of either the off-topic political discussion or because the argument against Adams didn't go the way they expected
>thread is deleted

The dog ate it after he left it in his other pants pocket.

Yes.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8894445/amp/UPS-Hunter-Biden-package-Tucker-Carlson-claimed-destroyed.html

And Hunter Biden isn't on the ballot.

Which is why the report is how Joe Biden used his son to launder money through both Ukranian and Chinese energy companies, as confirmed by their business partner.
The crack and porn stuff is just a funny aside.

All the better to keep those ventilators humming after a rally to Make America Great Again! I'm sure the President will come and sign that Iron Lung any day now.

>this thread again
I'll post the highlights from the previous thread ---
Scott Adams says that the side that is more persuasive is inevitably the winner.
He defines persuasion in a very deceitful and specific way.
By disregarding that some things can be decided independently of whether they're persuasive or not, he is being even more deceitful.

For example, "you can't know if a fetus is alive, therefore you're risking killing a baby" is persuasive, so abortion needs to be restricted. Or, "you can't know if climate change is really happening, so policies designed to prevent it need to be discarded." Make something unknowable, then defend the opposite position, preferably using appeals to emotion.

When he's wrong he often simply says that he was simply pressured into holding the wrong opinion. This is very dishonest, deceitful behavior, but Scott Adams professes that it's right because the argument that is more persuasive will eventually win out, regardless of whether or not it's correct.

>Some subjects probably didn’t say “baby” when prompted, so the hypnotist takes another path. He asks them if they would blow up a building if they didn’t know for sure whether or not there was a living person inside. Of course the subjects say no.
>Then the hypnotist connects the dots. You can’t be 100% certain there is no “life” in a fetus, even at a few weeks from conception. It is unknowable.
>Some of you asked what method could be used to flip someone from pro-life to pro-choice. That’s harder because the emotional argument is heavily biased to one side. (You can’t top a dead baby-maybe.) And emotion is a big part of persuasion.

So his view on persuasion is so:
- appeal to emotions
- pretend things are "unknowable"
- the right side is the side that's more persuasive

This is wrong. Some things ARE knowable. Emotions are frequently wrong. Being more persuasive doesn't make you right.

Attached: 2016-02-08-lord-dominatorxx.jpg (1200x743, 305.41K)

This sounds like a deceitful post against Scott Adams, I see you're learning from him.

>as confirmed by their business partner.

Bubbahoteph literally had no evidence to anything he was saying.

Except that he also turned his email accounts over to the FBI to corroborate the exchanges, so he shared direct, first hand evidence.

The power of US literacy! Be told that something vague and evil is out there, then tune into Alex Jones to find the craziest twist you can and say it like it's fact with the only remaining connection to reality being the vaguest of a link.

I really wonder what it's like living this disconnected from reality. It's insane accepting everything an user online told you when you yourself are an user perfectly aware of how you can say anything completely made up. The cognitive dissonance should hit you like a truck.

So the FBI already confirming the legitimacy of the emails and admitting there's an ongoing investigation into the money laundering is a gigantic conspiracy theory... perpetrated by the FBI?

Those emails prove nothing criminal about Joe Biden.

Another highlight from the previous thread: people from the Trump campaign were indicted, convicted, and admitted to conspiracy with Russian agents against the United States.
>the counterintelligence probe that in July 2016 began investigating possible collusion between Moscow and associates of Trump. Manafort was forced to resign as Trump campaign chairman in August 2016 amid questions over his business dealings in Ukraine years earlier.[95]
>In October 2017, Manafort was indicted by a federal grand jury and arrested on twelve criminal charges including conspiracy, money laundering, failure to register as an agent of a foreign power, and false statements.[97] The charges arose from his consulting work for a pro-Russian government in Ukraine and are unrelated to the Trump campaign.[98] Manafort pleaded not guilty and was placed under house arrest.[99] On February 22, 2018, Manafort was indicted on 32 federal charges including tax evasion, money laundering and fraud relating to their foreign lobbying before, during and after the 2016 campaign.[100] The following day, after Rick Gates plead guilty to some charges, he was indicted on two additional charges relating to pro-Russian lobbying in the United States.[101]
>On September 14, Manafort entered a plea deal with prosecutors, pleading guilty to a charge of conspiracy against the US and a charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice

So the man was arrested for colluding with Russia. Note that the legal term is "conspiracy against the US", because "collusion" is a legal business term. So the word "collusion" is used colloquially while the legal term is "conspiracy against the US".

People working for the Trump campaign committed conspiracy against the United States with Russian agents, which they admitted, and were convicted in a court of law for it, and sentenced for it.

Attached: 3bfa865ff34023ec28211a3cf804794e.jpg (2048x1644, 296.21K)

>deceitful post
>direct quotes in-context

>CRAZYCRAZYCRAZY
Not really helping your case here.

You have a lot of claims to source the buddy. The one official document posted has none of that and isn't even related to the emails.

I'm not the one with a case to make. Vomit word salad all you want, your source is second hand ass pulling.

But we only have your word that it's in-context.