How could you integrate farmer Thanos to the plot of Avengers: Endgame...

How could you integrate farmer Thanos to the plot of Avengers: Endgame? Zig Forums often cites his death as one of the movie's cons, but the Russos said they couldn't find an organic way to include him since his story arc as done and they didn't want to cheapen it.

Attached: JUSThanos.png (837x554, 565.22K)

i dont think reintegrating him into the movie really adds anything, he served his purpose in the plot.

>Story arc is done
>don't want to cheapen it
>Fucking execute him immediately and then replace him with another version of himself
God, fucking hacks.

Just have him get involved directly to stop the heroes from undoing shit?
It's not hard.
Film should've ended with the reverse snap.

Farmer Thanos seems based. Why is MCU no fun allowed?

Attached: fd6c108759a98b1d7d938f241eae3431.jpg (1400x2202, 496.22K)

But Thanos is pretty much done at that point. He has no army, and the other HUGE thing, ever since Thanos kills Gamora, he loses his killer spirit. He just wanted to do the snap and be done with it all. Thanos pre-killing Gamora was enjoying the slaughter. Thanos post killing Gamora was a sad old man.

Why didn't Thanos just go back and and use the time gem to resurrect Gamora?

Infinity gauntlet induced amnesia, but it would still cheapen the plot because he isn't atoning for his sins by living with the guilt.

Nebula lives on farmworld with Thanos.
Says shes leaving without telling him why.
Returns and makes up a reason why she went away.
And Thanos spends the rest of his days thinking he saved the universe.

Farmer Thanos should have realized that his solution caused more pain/suffering. People are unable to move on. With time to reflect on what was done, his rage at what happened upon Titan subsiding, he finally comes to his senses and wants the snapping to be undone. He'd come to Earth, give some information to the Avengers on the stones, maybe help them make the gauntlet. He'd aid the Avengers in fighting his younger self. He and the Young Thanos could have a conversation on the methods to save the world. It's the one lingering plot thread from Infinity War that is unresolved. Thanos's whole motivation for eliminating 50 percent is to save the world from overpopulation. We're told this solved poverty issues on Gamora's planet. Thanos had to be shown this was wrong.

I'd end his story with him, going on a journey through the universe to try and repent for his many sins. You could even do a Thanos movie that sets up more cosmic shit.

Attached: 1585657821863.png (324x499, 444.46K)

The problem with Thanos is that he doesn't work in MCU. He just wants to go on a self destructive rampage and then repent like a sinner

Nah. You'd get #cancelled for showing a genocidist can be redeeemed. Better yo just kill him in all worlds.

Have him use his full armor and the partially busted infinity gauntlet against all the heroes at once, then the reason he loses is because he actually feels regret for what he's done. Then he agrees to undo the snap only after they come to a compromise on how to implement a better plan for overpopulation and resource scarcity. Then he goes back into self imposed exile so they can have him return when Shuma Gorrath shows up, alerted by the strong presence of life in the mcu reality

Instead of killing him, he's being held as a prisoner.

When new Thanos shows up, he talks with farmer Thanos but ends up killing him because he thinks farmer thanos failed.

>Avengers enter The Garden and finds the sick and crippled Thanos
>they instead leave disappointed and not kill Thanos
>5 years later and Thanos sees and realizes that he was wrong all along
>same movie happens
>Young Thanos is still the villain
>Young Thanos stomps and clearly wins
>Strange pulls out one last portal
>Old Thanos comes out of the portal, healed but not in his prime
>O.Thanos tries to reason to his younger self, but he refuses to listen and beats his older self.
>Thanos almost kills O.Thanos but Tony saves O.Thanos and is mortally wounded
>Thanos turns his gaze on O.Thanos and chastises him for being weak and vowing never to turn like him
>O. Thanos smiles
>"Its inevitable"
>Old Thanos sacrifices himself by snapping Younger Thanos and his goons off of existence
>Thanos is once again beaten by his greatest enemy, himself.
>fading Thanos looks at the dying Tony Stark
>"They will remember you"
BONUS
>fading Old Thanos has a talk with Cap and Tony
>warns them that he knows that doom *wink wink* will come upon them, that he was trying to prevent a Galactic threat *wink wink* much bigger than what he brought, but allows them to make the choice, "you still have the stones".
>Cap and Tony says that no matter what happens,they all will face it togehter
>Thanos dusts

Attached: 1562222322555.jpg (1920x1080, 165.9K)

Moral Fags just don't understand Thanks because he's three dimensional and complex. In the Comics there was a duality between him and Adam Warlock. The Movies he lacks a relationship with Tony or the Avengers and treats them like obstacles

Attached: fgfdhfdh.png (509x423, 11.41K)

I think the story would have been better if it was just about the avengers accepting they lost, dealing with it, and actually moving on instead of finding a way to fix everything.
Put some new bad guy in and pull it all together despite being very depressed, or have some way for them to restore the people, like maybe Thanos didn't break the magic gems, idk though that was kind of cool.
But then again, I have a deep loathing for time travel, I think it's a weak plot device that has only really ever been done well in films twice.

You're an idiot.

It kind of sucks that we treat characters like thanos and poison ivy as wrong. When the planit is a hot shitty husk we .might not feel that way.

The answer is literally to not have so many children. But we refuse for whatever reason. I have no idea why. Poor people dont even enjoy having kids and they have the most.

Fucking weak willed cuck unwilling to make the hard choices to save the world.

Soul Stone deaths are completely irreversible.

>The answer is literally to not have so many children. But we refuse for whatever reason. I have no idea why. Poor people dont even enjoy having kids and they have the most.

Its about having a support system. For most of human history, if you needed help it was only going to come from your family. MAYBE your neighbors if you lived in a community. But get any further removed than that and the chance of any real support drops off tremendously. If you needed help on the farm, you better have kids that can do the work. If you wanted someone to be around to take care of you when you were old and frail, you better have kids that can support you when you can't support yourself.

This instinct has kept us alive for a million years, and it didn't just go away because we had the industrial revolution and manpower stopped being so valuable. But whats the trend that we see, across the world? In countries with higher quality of life, with more social support systems? The birth rate goes down. People don't feel compelled to have as many kids. The less trust you have that the system can take care of you, the more kids you pop out because those kids are the only thing you can count on. The more well off you are/more faith you have in the social contract to provide for you, the fewer kids you have.

The answer to reducing overpopulation is unironically socialism and improving quality of life for the poor. Better education, economic mobility, healthcare, etc. People can piss and moan about a culture war thats been dead for decades, but the numbers don't lie.

It will totally work this time!

Thats a meme about communism. Socialism is different. Canada has socialism. So does much of Europe. No one is arguing for communism, but capitalism is an ideology that turns into oligarchy without moderation. That means a healthy dose of socialism as a counter-force.

>It will totally work this time!

Most of the stuff user is talking about was developed by the greatest generation . You know, the guys that beat nazi's and created the greatest economy on earth until baby boomers shat it all away.

That's right, you probably think hitler was an ok chap because you've watched a bunch of videos made for by Russia, trying to destabilize the US dollar and get more countries to back their dollar with the russian currency.

But the facts dont like, the greatest generation had lots of socialism and beat the nazies. Also put man on the moon. Also build the strongest economy to have ever existed.

But hey, pure capitalism. It sure did a great job of fucking us in the 80s and 90s.

>The answer to reducing overpopulation is unironically socialism and improving quality of life for the poor.
Or we can just couple welfare with criminalizing having children while on welfare.

Or, better yet, we just stop giving food to 3rd world countries, because that's where a huge chunk of the overpopulation is coming from.

>"government does things" = socialism
When you define everything beyond libertarian pseudo-anarchy as socialist, then no shit socialism works.

>>warns them that he knows that doom *wink wink* will come upon them, that he was trying to prevent a Galactic threat *wink wink* much bigger than what he brought, but allows them to make the choice, "you still have the stones".
I will now buy your movie

>the guys that beat nazi's
Certainly not Americans?
>muh Russia behind everything hurr durr
Fuck off, schizo.

If socialism is so great, why did the Nazis (national SOCIALISTS) lose?

Checkmate, pinko.

kino

>villain character arc is done
>make the hero fight a younger less developped verion