Would it have been a better ending?

Attached: beauty_and_the_beast_family__girl_time_by_spicysteweddemon_dakj8ga-fullview.jpg (1024x1304, 147.56K)

the beast appearance is a curse, not a mutation, his kids aren't cursed and should be human

Who cares? They all would've died during the Reign of Terror, anyway.

Attached: guillotine-execution-de-la-Revolution-canvas-paper-1793.jpg (1600x1133, 484.26K)

No, but this is.

Attached: 0.jpg (576x756, 99.13K)

Curse sometimes is transmitted to kids.

Yeah I mean your mom was an ugly cursed monster and look at you!

Attached: 7C557812-147D-493E-97F0-405E629DCF76.jpg (343x517, 22.81K)

Leaving the beast a beast would be a much better ending. That's the character we've become familiar with throughout the film, and frankly it's a much more expressive and interesting design.
But you can't leave the staff transformed, they're set up as innocent victims throughout the movie and leaving them as living furniture would only be slightly better than leaving them as literal furniture.
I suppose you could pull some kind of loophole out of your ass at the last minute, the beast doesn't get to become human because he ran out of time, but the staff do. Or the witch comes along at the last moment and changes the staff back, seems to have had a partial change of heart.

Attached: 0f8a350092459d6879337f999cc09b8f.jpg (1175x1200, 273K)

I like to think that he end up growing a beard at Belle's request and every time he suggested shaving, Belle told him no.

Thanks for the fap material

Wish I could find a bigger version of it.

wy talking about this is pretty big and hi res

Attached: Gaston.jpg (1905x270, 113.13K)

Marie Antoinette never said that.

Imagine the smell.

Attached: F0808EF7-DD1F-4702-A8A8-543BC5EAC27F.jpg (700x919, 76.88K)

That doesn't mean it wasn't claimed that she said it, like the OP said.

Attached: 1394061679883.png (700x580, 348.63K)

Attached: 1403384707374.png (500x578, 374.47K)

Yeah but a problem with the movie is that they don't try to actually humanize him. Sure they make him sympathetic so you want to see him become human again but you ever only know him as "The Beast". He's never given a name in the movie proper so the audience just knows him as "The Beast".

Giving the beast a name would've been a small but huge addition that would've really helped perfect the movie. Imagine the reaction from Gaston and the townsfolk if Belle actually used his name instead of "The Beast".

"You're telling me this THING, has a name!?" - Gaston

remember, beast was only like 10/11 when the witch or fairy or whatever she was cursed him

>Yeah but a problem with the movie is that they don't try to actually humanize him.
If you are talking about the 90's movie, they absolutely do.

What movie is?

I think it's comfortably before the Revolution

You can't prove she didn't say nothin

Attached: 1554410273269.jpg (664x655, 79.46K)

>comfortably before
>when Belle reads a hundred books and isn't burnt as a witch
DOUBT

It's 18th century France not 19th century Russia

The real messed up part is that at no point is it implied that the curse affected his personality. He was just LIKE that.

Well that's why we have the ending to Shrek 2. Because it turns out that deep down, we're all tf fetishists.

There's no way her little town would have that many books, available to the commoners at that, if it's far enough back in time that they won't get touched by the Revolution. Belle and Beast will have to flee the pitchforks once more, no matter what.

If anything he was even worse before he got cursed, because then he had pride over his looks to add to his assholeishness, and wasn't united with his servants by them all being under a curse together.

To be fair he was a kid and spent a good portion of his life as an animal.

i wonder if he felt a downgrade when his jerking hand became normal and smaller. Tho probably he had an ugly animal dick and now has a human penis

>tfw you get your foreskin back

Attached: Awkward Aussie.jpg (806x753, 445.59K)