Why did Cartoon Network feel it was necessary to let kids know that Stevonnie has both a penis and a vagina?

>teaching boys to play with fireworks safely
You're right.

Agreed

It lets kids know it's okay to be trans*! There's nothing wrong with being non-binary, or intersex, or anything of the sort! By opening up their understanding of what gender and sex is, we can finally teach kids that it's not a two-option system, but whatever they feel most comfortable identifying as!

South Park taught important lessons that your parents wouldn't teach you
youtube.com/watch?v=jZDVSyEIrwM

At least SP has occasionally good morals despite the edginess. SU is just mind poison.

I unironically wouldn't let my kids watch SU or other shows in its mold.

I love how SU legit triggers more people than SP

Yeah. I'd be worried if it didn't honestly.

>I am an experience
I find this more disconcerting than the intersex thing. What does this mean? Sounds like some new age shit a Californian hipster would write

Unironicaly, this is less harmful to tweens than Steven Universe

You weirdos are coping to insane degrees if you think SP is better for children because of an intersex person in SU

Attached: 52DD0AC8-2034-424A-BCAA-3F0FCE7328F6.jpg (851x636, 65.16K)

If a cartoon character is male, is that the same as "letting kids know the character has a penis"?

It's not because an intersex person is in the show, SP has intersex characters too.

I guarantee most of us posting watched SP as children

I honestly think early SP is mostly fine for some kids to watch, at least if they're like 4th or 5th grade and up. That's when my friends and I started watching anyway. The worst that happened was we learned new curse words. Basically like the start of the SP movie when all the kids saw the Terrence and Philip movie.
youtube.com/watch?v=aVFsIW__Byk

Libtard hands typed this post.

this

This is true. It's better for children to be exposed to graphic sex scenes involving trans people, as long as the underlying message is "trans people are gross". It's okay for children to see Lemmiwinks climbing up Mr. Slave's asshole but it's not okay for them to see Ruby and Sapphire get married.

South Park never had a fanbase that bullied someone so close into committing suicide.

>Forgetting about Bergman

Quick rundown?

you retards do realize that being intersex isn't like being trans and it's literally a physical condition you're born as right

acknowledging that that shit exists isn't sjwpropoganda even if you think trans stuff is

to make the r34 interesting

Nobody cares about the intersex part, it's the pronouns and the "I am an experience."

Yes everyone knows that fucknut, it's just strange that a children's cartoon passingly mentions a deformity

>Steven was literally born as Stevonnie you guys
you're the big dumb

*obviously the "I am an experience" and the whole profile is tongue-in-cheek to an extent, just saying why I think people are reacting to it

Fusions are separate entities from their components. Stevonnie isn't Steven or Connie, just like Garnet isn't Ruby or Sapphire. Stevonnie was born as Stevonnie.

I wonder if these people would get mad at their baby for promoting sjw libcuck propaganda if it happened to be born intersex.

Intersex has nothing to do with sjw libcuck propaganda.

Mary Kay Bergman killed herself because of a host of personal issues, SP had as much to do with it as Fairly OddParents or Scooby-Doo did.

SUfags actually drove some kid to suicide because she didn't draw a character fat enough.

To appeal to the 0.005% of kids born as hermaphrodites.

It's because SU portrays new gender theory in an unrealistically positive light.
Unfortunately, we live in a joker2019.mp4 that silences voices that bring up the physical limitations of transition and the reasonable position that you can treat gender issues through psychotherapy.
Many children and adults choose transition because they know of no other way forward only to discover the harm afterward.

Then why is the OP of this thread specifically talking about Stevonnie being intersex, or "having a penis and a vagina"?

I don't know

From what I heard that SU girl had an abusive family

It's actually more like 1%. It's more common than being a redhead.

>I am an experience

Is that an invite?

In case you weren't aware intersex people in real life can't turn their intersex-ness on and off whenever they want by using gay rock magic

Which certainly wasn't helped by the fact that she was systematically harassed for not drawing certain characters fat or black enough for SUfags.

SU is a cancer.

Because at CN, they know the kids are vulnerable. They want to infect the youth of today that it's okay to be non-binary, the opposite gender, or gay/lesbian.

You are going to sit there, shut up and accept it.

it's called propaganda

> kids

who do you think steven universe's target audience is? The show went on for 6 damn years, even from the start you could argue it wasn't aimed at kids and more the teen/ya demo.

Weird, I saw different estimates depending on where you look. I guess it depends on how you define it.
ihra.org.au/16601/intersex-numbers/
Apparently 1.7% is an upper estimate
>This estimate relates to any “individual who deviates from the Platonic ideal of physical dimorphism at the chromosomal, genital, gonadal, or hormonal levels” and thus it seeks to encapsulate the entire population of people who are stigmatised – or risk stigmatisation – due to innate sex characteristics.
The lower estimate is 1 in 1,500 or 1 in 2,000 live births
>These tend to exclude many intersex variations that are otherwise considered by medicine now to be “Disorders of Sex Development” or “DSD”; they focus on a narrower range of traits where external genitalia are “ambiguous” and diagnosis is made at birth.

It's literally not. 1% would be 1 out of every 100 people being born with fucked up chromosomes that give them extra genitalia. Maybe it's 1% if you throw in the delusional pretenders that don't actually have the disorder.

Doctors usually correct the genitals at birth now though.
Anyways, hermaphrodism is actually real and a completely different phenomenon than internet genders.