Can someone explain why we have become extremely puritan in animation...

Can someone explain why we have become extremely puritan in animation? Wasn't the sexual revolution about being free with the sexual freedom of women? So why did we take a complete 180 with feminist entities basically stopping women from wanting to be sexy and beautiful anymore? Why are women in cartoons being potrayed as flat and covered up like they're a priestess at some church? Isn't that the opposite of what women wanted? I just find it entirely ironic that animation went the wrong way.

Attached: 1430775133886.jpg (1000x1295, 201.11K)

Sexist.

This bothers me cause you'd think women would like being potrayed as good looking in cartoons.

Attached: 1513159652780.png (640x788, 577.63K)

The disease.
>Wasn't the sexual revolution about being free with the sexual freedom of women
Only when they said is ok (and this can be changed at any time by them)
>So why did we take a complete 180 with feminist entities basically stopping women from wanting to be sexy and beautiful anymore?
Because the disease changed the meaning of those words like they always do.
>Why are women in cartoons being potrayed as flat and covered up like they're a priestess at some church? Isn't that the opposite of what women wanted?
Same answer as before.

A complete explanation would require a complete understanding of the female mind, which is not possible for beings outside the fifth dimension.
But part of this is that, the moment they took off their bras and exposed their breasts, the men, when they were not yet a minority, said "we like tits, keep showing".
And being feminists, then crazy, they couldn't stand the thought of happy men. Then they decided to switch to another approach. Cover everything.

Cartoons are viewed as primarily for children and corporate executives aren't going to green light a porn cartoon for cartoon network

Sounds like you're watching shitty shows and only know how to complain.

Attached: 1334635511685.png (298x222, 110.5K)

They will get nude. but not for males to ogle. They don't want makes to be happy.

I look at it like this.

>women want to make men angry
>so break free of their father's values and strips
>men suddenly like this a lot
>beautiful women continue to get even more value out of this
>uglier and older women become angry so turn feminism into basically christianity again, covering all the women up and slapping their hands with rulers to stop

Attached: sue1.jpg (356x1024, 146.93K)

women get jealous and feel bad about themselves when they see a woman more attractive than them, even if she is animated. That is why you see the rise of fat dumpy actresses in Hollywood.

>But part of this is that, the moment they took off their bras and exposed their breasts, the men, when they were not yet a minority, said "we like tits, keep showing".
>And being feminists, then crazy, they couldn't stand the thought of happy men. Then they decided to switch to another approach. Cover everything.

This is essentially it.

>for children

You have no idea what we as children saw back in the day.

Attached: file.png (1440x1080, 2.88M)

The hilarious part is that women would find that beautiful women still are on the top doing stuff for men cause covering up is getting rid of your best weapon as sexist. Even the fatties having their tits out will get some men oogling.

Theres no reason for so much skin and seductive intent when you think of most kids related shows. In japan its the reason birth rates are low, every medium is sexually filled with drawn semi porn.

>its the reason birth rates are low
birth rate is low in the west too. It has nothing to do with porn considering birth rates were sky high when cartoons looked like this. So it's less to do with what we're being fed and more to do with far more subtle things

Attached: 1294606088731099209.jpg (800x451, 37.29K)

Because the US is fucked up.

I dunno, can someone explain why the same crowd crying about cartoons being to puritan will then proceed to cry about "muh degeneracy" like EEnE horny fanart or straight up dismiss actual booba because of petty whataboutisms?

Attached: n-no it doesn't count.png (1066x598, 1004.51K)

What do you mean? Never heard that before

The sexual revolution was about creating a mass influx of women in the work force to insure a steady supply of cheap labor and keep wages stagnant while people were too busy cooming to know what was going on.

chel was the best. She had the sex appeal going on but had character and her own thing going on. She proves you can have a character who gets thirsty without it being her only trait

Then lurk more, troll

sorry that I dont pay attention autistically like you to everything

>people who fought for freedom are using their freedom for something i do not like
>ergo they are not free

draw your own cartoons you gay fags.

have sex.

>people who fought for freedom are using their freedom for something i do not like
>ergo they are not free
the hell are you trying to say

Because it's all a political tool to them. The only thing they care about is dragging social standards backwards. This means they don't care for consistency: they'll whine about too much sexuality when it suits their needs and harp on about lack of boobers when they think they can win over horny teens who don't think critically.

They'll do the same shit with other social issues. Just look at how many Q associated peeps turned out to be pedos.

Why doesn't Zig Forums make their own cartoons if they want more sexy women?

Attached: 1572354918409.png (491x359, 228.32K)

Because double standard. You cant sexualise or exploit female characters, this is why actresses in hollywood are fridges and wooden planks. But every series need sexutanment.

>has nothing to do with porn
Normalization of pornography along with other things has been part of the problem
>when cartoons looked like this
That's not pornographic

I'm saying you can't point to a free person making a decision as something insidious, and changing the decision at will as inconsistent to freedom.

You're missing the point. Media always had fringes or pornagraphy. Older civilizations were sex crazed, too. Aristocrats held sex parties almost daily. It's more culture than the content we consume.

Attached: Long Ben, Arch Pirate.jpg (510x636, 123.07K)

Okay, but what does that have to do with the threads topic?

Didn't you recently had 3 cartoons for adults with explicit boobs? Or your problem is just children's media?

Dilate and join the 41%

>Didn't you recently had 3 cartoons for adults with explicit boobs
There's a lot of cartoons. Which are you talking about?

the left has been taken over by mentally insane people that focus on feminist and sjw nonsense to distract from the fact how the rich keep getting richer while everybody else gets poorer.

Castlevania, Blood of Zeus and Onyx Equinox all came this two last years and have boobs uncensored.

>netflix cartoons

Netflix is part of the problem.

It's unlikely that Japan's low birthrate is a result of sexuality in cartoons.
Western low birthrates are incomparable to Japan's, which is really all about the expectations of a traditional feudal society having been brought into sharp conflict with modern reality as a result of incredibly rapid industrialization. Also, your example is barely sexual - quite frankly, American cartoons have never been very sexually charged. French and Spanish stuff is still as sexy as ever and they have all the same social issues to varying degrees, with the exception that their right wing isn't quite as dangerously regressive or openly seditious yet.
>Media always had fringes or pornagraphy.
Fringes, yes. But you shouldn't expect pornographic or near-pornographic content in everything. Frankly, it's a sign of arrested development to do so.

Yet autistic is the only way to describe this sorry excuse of a thread

>with the exception that their right wing isn't quite as dangerously regressive or openly seditious yet.
I see where your predispositions lie quickly pointing out that right wing people are the reason for censoring. News flash, it was always women who censored shit, left or right wing. it just so happens that the current moment, it's majority left wing women doing the censoring.

>it's autistic to notice that women are far less sexy in animation than before

Wow, that's a low bar to set.

it’s a mix of corporate sanitization to sell products in China and “fuck you dad” feminist ideologues being astroturfed into media production companies. another happy coincidence of leftists helping to do the bidding of international corporations.

Pornography has never been normalized to the extent that it is now. Even in Pompeii they weren't showing it in the middle of the street.

Diversity and inclusion is a false flag designed to distract from the wealthy elite leeching off the poor and middle class. They keep us distracted with issues of race and gender instead of the true issue of wealth and power disparities.

>Pornography has never been normalized to the extent that it is now
Pompeii women literally wore drabs of cloth that barely contained their breasts.

It goes in waves like any fashion, you idiots.

communists.

That doesn't answer my question. Are you deflecting?

Americans are Puritans by default. Except when it comes to violence of course.
>T-TITS!!! AAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEE
>SCHOOL SHOOTER!? IT’SSSSSS AWWWWWRIIIIIIGGGGHHHHHTTTT!!!!!

Children rebel against the parents. And America has a prudish core. Those kids grow up and reflect our society.

The hilarious part is you think this is 100% women's doing despite the fact you post on a majority male site quick to call every woman not dressed as a nun a slut.

Not deflection. Netflix cartoons are are a different beast entirely.

Women get handed everything in life by guys for having tits and pussy. Women get old and guys don't want old tits and old pussy. Women whine that guys liking tits and pussy is now wrong after they have benefited from it whilst the expecting to keep the same benefits for no reason.

All femminism inherently comes from ugly old women.

>quick to call every woman not dressed as a nun a slut.
where did anyone say a woman who is sexual is a slut?

>I see where your predispositions lie quickly pointing out that right wing people are the reason for censoring.
That's not what I was saying. I'm saying more that the American right is literally averse to life and reality at this point, to the extent of throwing itself behind actual sedition. But the right wing still calls for censorship, they've just mostly locked themselves out of media due to decades of telling their kids that creativity is gay.

Censorship =/= making things the way you want to make them. There are no laws that forbid tits. Sex can be shown.

>I'm saying more that the American right is literally averse to life and reality at this point, to the extent of throwing itself behind actual sedition. But the right wing still calls for censorship, they've just mostly locked themselves out of media due to decades of telling their kids that creativity is gay.
You have a very narrow view on people to make such a claim. I can tell you now, you're completely wrong on that read considering I live around mostly that type. At the moment, it's entirely a left wing puritan movement to the point that right wing people currently are considered sexually progressive.

Birth rates in Japan aren't as low as the memes say, there are parts of Europe with lower birthrates. It's more more a combination of feminism, nihilism and infantilization

>Censorship =/= making things the way you want to make them.
Ad bucks determines content today, not consumers. If your content is more adult related in theme, advertisement agencies will not promote you.

Simple: There's been a ton of sexual harassment complaints from female cosplayers about the way men behave so business made the rule strict and will fire the man.

Stop bitching and own up to the fact that men have themselves to blame, pig!