Worst Villians

It's based on a tax shell game. If you leave your inheritance to a person (your kids, etc.), many jurisdictions have an inheritance tax. If, however, you leave it in a trust, say, one meant for a person's cats, and name your kid the trustee, they can theoretically have it all, tax-free, as long as the cats die of natural causes.

I'm a cat person anyway, so that just means free money and cats for me, so win/win. Post your kot. Here's mine.

Attached: 62139172_481934835881550_4157830055390609408_n.jpg (688x1440, 76.18K)

>t.Ruber
You lost to a Farm girl
That's fucking genius

She's lucky people want to fuck a dominant short stack receptionist sheep. If she was a human nobody would know her name.

Attached: 1597579984008.jpg (934x785, 50.09K)

it also makes sure that people actually take care of your pets
maybe for a cat or a dog it isn't necessary, but if you have any form of parrot you better damn well make sure someone will actively take care of them after you're gone

>madame, remember the cats you told me yesterday will inherit all your fortune instead of me?
>yes?
>they are gone and will never come back
>oh no!
the plot of this movie was like one of my mexican telenovelas

Ruber was a fuck lad you shut your dumb faggot whore mouth.

I don't think anyone knows the sheep's name eitherway

I'd still fuck

Holy shit that’s brilliant

>you can have the money when the parrot dies of natural causes
>parrots can live for 60 years

80 years if it's a grey or a cockatoo
and the latter will absolutely make it their life mission to drive an unprepared caretaker (one does not "own" a parrot, they're to smart to be proper pets) utterly insane

>Worst Villians
Yet you start off with one of THE best villains in animated history.
youtube.com/watch?v=UPK0bHsA5Cg

Attached: CO_Ruber_The_One_True_King_2.png (1566x2327, 591.01K)

Attached: 1560904755116.gif (578x463, 439.48K)

a tree can naturally fall over it

Ruber tried to take away King Arthur's Kingdom he deserved everything he got and more. He better be glad Arthur was merciful and even let him go the first time.

That actually makes it much better because then you could pace out your expenditures (if you given millions of dollars from a dying, wealthy socialite, so for say) to keep the tax man's eyes pointed elsewhere.

Say you got a multi-million dollar trust for one of those parrots. You could pay some schmuck $20k a year just to keep the bird alive at his house and never have to hear it once while laughing your ass all the way to the bank.

Arthur was a cunt anyways
Charlemagne is the one true king of legend

what if getting access to the money depended on the parrot giving permission
they can speak and are smart enough to understand human speech so you definitely could set it up so that whoever is the parrot's caretaker needs to be close enough to the parrot to get it to say the necessary words

could make for a decent comedy

That is why you'd want to set up a trust for your parrot. He is going to live and remember you for as long as any of your kids would.

That's actually a clever toon concept, but IRL it wouldn't work. Animal 'testimony' is verboten in the US, and hasn't been successfully implemented in Europe.

lawblog.legalmatch.com/2016/06/21/parrots-testimony-admissible-court/

OP is a bundle of sticks with pride

Attached: Ruben.gif (300x167, 537.32K)

Parrots can get pretty attached to the people who take care of them. They also live forever.

that's why the money is not in a US bank but in [insert island nation with really progressive laws regarding personhood]
laws which may or may not have had something to do with the former owner having fuck you levels of money and a dear love of his parrot

sure, but you need to actually give a shit for a parrot to get attached to you, they know if you're faking it and can't just be appeased with food