"AGHHHHHH CATRA HELP I GREW BREASTS, I HATE FEMININITY I HAVE TO CUT THEM OFF"

Kek

>Shes a prude and she hates feminine features
Based.
Women should be ashamed of their bodies and cover themselves and stay in the kitchen until the husband tells them to go out.
This is what America always wanted for women.

Puritan fucks like you should be exterminated

>Let me help
>Also I’m fucking Catra

Attached: 069066CC-EFBC-46E8-85C7-E61FA2196339.png (1136x640, 827.66K)

She a "prude" for not sexulaizing characters in a show made for little girls?

Like, you know what the target demographic for She-Ra is right? It's not us 20+ year old male perverts.

>She a "prude" for not sexulaizing characters in a show made for little girls?
1. This show is for adult tunblrites

2. There is nothing wrong with making kids characters pretty or feminine. Desexualizing them from looking normal is just prudish

>This show is for adult tunblrites
Doesn't matter, Netflix approved it for children, if it was for adults it would have had more gore since it's a rule of adult cartoons
>There is nothing wrong with making kids characters pretty or feminine.
As there is nothing wrong with making kids characters ugly or masculine
>Desexualizing them from looking normal is just prudish
According to your definition of normal, desexualizing doesn't hurt.

>1. This show is for adult tunblrites
Says who
>2. There is nothing wrong with making kids characters pretty or feminine. Desexualizing them from looking normal is just prudish
>Desexualizing them from looking normal
Are you implying you find kid characters sexy?

Should I story time this again or no?

Attached: The weight of them.png (612x792, 177.65K)

It's just the art, there are not so much different as the Love Live girls besides Glimmer not having cowtits and no buff girl in the Love Live cast

Bring Evil Lynn with you and her

Please do so.

>Doesn't matter, Netflix approved it for children, if it was for adults it would have had more gore since it's a rule of adult cartoons
Yet only adult twitter users watch it, the designs are so off putting that no kid would watch it
>As there is nothing wrong with making kids characters ugly or masculine
For female characters it is wrong
>According to your definition of normal, desexualizing doesn't hurt.
It does, its prudish and backwards and only done by soccer moms and man hating feminists who hate pleasing men through pleasing designs, so they uglyfy them out of spite
>Says who
Look at the fanbase on twitter and you wont find little kids talking about this, just soi boys in their 30s and ugly bulldykes
>Are you implying you find kid characters sexy?
There cartoons so its fine, if they really wanted this show to have been popular they wouldve made she ra attractive like ladybug

Alright.

Attached: 1.png (612x792, 60.43K)

RENT

FREE

How many little girls are gonna butcher themselves because their role model Nolan Stevenson did?

Love live girls are actually attractive unlike the unattractive titless androgynous dykes in soi-ra
Dew it

Attached: 2.png (612x792, 53.3K)

Little girls dont watch this show, but i could picture a few twitter users butchering themselves because noelle told them it was fine

Was Noelle that busty before having them removed?

Attached: 3.png (612x792, 62.62K)

Attached: 4.png (612x792, 48.3K)

It's the art and the miniskirts. Just drawn Honoka, Umi and Rin like She-ra characters and you will find them "ugly" too

Okay, but, why doesn't DC/Marvel draw any dick bulges?

Attached: 5.png (612x792, 55.51K)

You spell Arab wrong

Attached: 6.png (612x792, 44.47K)

The art style is fucking horrible, it tries to be anime but by removing all the things that make anime style good because its "sexist"

>Yet only adult twitter users watch it, the designs are so off putting that no kid would watch it
I don't know that for sure but it doesn't matter. It's for children and was approved for children.
Like the ponies show.
>For female characters it is wrong
Why so? Cartoons should be free to do what they want with the characters.
>It does, its prudish and backwards and only done by soccer moms and man hating feminists who hate pleasing men through pleasing designs, so they uglyfy them out of spite
This is a projection, wouldn't it be far more believable that they just want to design the characters how they want for pleasing themselves and their fetish?
Like Fat Glimmer.
>Look at the fanbase on twitter and you wont find little kids talking about this, just soi boys in their 30s and ugly bulldykes
And so?
Kids can't use twitter, I'm sure they have some clubs in their schools where they chat about it.
>There cartoons so its fine, if they really wanted this show to have been popular they wouldve made she ra attractive like ladybug
Wanting to be popular is really pathetic, they should try to be good first and not going with the fanservice.

Attached: 7.png (612x792, 62.49K)

>I hate femininity
>in love with a female
It's a trump cope thread
No colors
No women
No gays
No trans
Etc.

Attached: 8.png (612x792, 84.4K)

She sounds like a very annoying and arrogant person

>>Says who
>Look at the fanbase on twitter and you wont find little kids talking about this, just soi boys in their 30s and ugly bulldykes
No fanbase is composed of children. If you consider the fandom as the target audience, then MLP was originally meant for 30yo neckbeards right?

>>Are you implying you find kid characters sexy?
>There cartoons so its fine, if they really wanted this show to have been popular they wouldve made she ra attractive like ladybug
Back then you used the word "sexy", now you are saying "attractive". You are again implying they made this show with the intention of targeting Zig Forumsomers.

>trump
take your pills

>I don't know that for sure but it doesn't matter. It's for children and was approved for children.
>Like the ponies show.
Its full of propaganda so children shouldnt even watch it in the first place
>Why so? Cartoons should be free to do what they want with the characters.
No they shouldnt be allowed to uglyfy their characters just to spite men
>This is a projection, wouldn't it be far more believable that they just want to design the characters how they want for pleasing themselves and their fetish?
Like Fat Glimmer.
How can someone like glimmer be so fat and not have any tits, it makes no sense
>And so?
>Kids can't use twitter, I'm sure they have some clubs in their schools where they chat about it.
I dont see any kids on devientart or social media talking about this show, it missed its core demographic
>Wanting to be popular is really pathetic, they should try to be good first and not going with the fanservice.
But now its just pure shit that isnt good and cant win any fans over with fan service. Only prudes dont like fan service

Attached: 9.png (612x792, 34.1K)

The amount of people here that don't understand sarcasm is genuinely concerning

Attached: 10.png (612x792, 54.42K)

>Back then you used the word "sexy", now you are saying "attractive". You are again implying they made this show with the intention of targeting Zig Forumsomers.
Well if they did it wouldve been actually good and maybe wouldve been popular

>She sounds like a very annoying and arrogant person

Attached: chüd.png (579x380, 329.7K)