The badwebcomic wiki is kinda shit

A review gets made when someone in the forums gets off their ass to write one instead of constantly going "do this one, do that one." They hit most of the popular shit ones ages ago because it's an old ass website that's been hit god knows how many times before this one.

Also could have sworn I've seen a stonetoss page at one point. I check it every once in a while for new pages.

A lot of the newer reviews feel kinda halfassed compared to like a decade ago.

Attached: 1581073162251.jpg (451x359, 20.18K)

Does that mean anyone can propose doing a Stonetone review and get it published?

one review didn't even have art
>Unfortunately the website will not allow me to copy any pictures from it; I must resort to a verbal description.
badwebcomicswiki.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Slaughter_at_Camp_Notamoovi

no because they said "it would be giving into the bait" if they did, they're fucking retarded

took me 1 second on google to find a photo too

Attached: AHAHAHHAH.png (584x402, 321.48K)

Honestly no clue, but you have a better case to get one put up if you have something more than "I don't like thing." That's usually the case when it comes to them dragging their feet on a comic.

They're kinda retarded, but honestly we're long past the days of dealing with people like B^Uckley and Sohmer and their fans so I'm not surprised they'd want to keep out under the pretense of "bait."

it would probably help their dying website to review someone who ACTUALLY deserves it and not some nobody with 100 twitter followers

What was the last "big" webcomic they've even gone after? Do webcomics even get that big anymore outside of legacy ones? I kinda checked out of looking them up regularly after sites like webtoon and tapas came around.
Honestly, the only one I'm actively reading right now is ennui go, and that's kinda disappointing to me. I used to have mountains of them I'd keep up with.

Attached: 1577401010938.jpg (141x184, 14.05K)

I;m going to be honest, probably none in the past 5 years, and there are big web comics, such as Erma and Shen, that finnish guy with the chad, merryweathery etc

tapatalk.com/groups/badwebcomicswikiforum/ennui-go-t1471.html
also they wanted to review that

Not surprised. It starts with "lol sex, violence, and nerd humor" type shit that almost any early/mid 2000s webcomic has. Past that, it of course goes into "I don't like" territory and that's probably why they're still sitting on just forum posts a year later.

Do they go after bigger targets like oh say.. Modern Mogal? (Whether you like it or not, what you like WILL be hated by someone)

I remember one of the negatives for Spinerrette was the guy going on about how the Greta Gravity character was a beyond offensive stereotype.

it's a site whose popularity died with encyclopedia dramatica, of which it was a less retarded sibling. They shared admins even, if I recall

>was the guy going on about how the Greta Gravity character was a beyond offensive stereotype.
???

Fair

Thats ecen worse

>all they do is hit easy targets
well yeah it's not a general review site it's a site where people are going to read about BAD webcomics, this is like going to badmovies and complaining that they're only hitting easy targets, that's the whole point.
>why won't they do stonetoss
can't say OP, personally I don't think there's anything remarkable about Stonetoss other than his politics, and if you want to talk about those there are lots of other sites doing that.
given the time the site was made and the content I'm guessing yeah it is.

I think the reviews are halfassed because there aren't as many bad webcomics anymore, it's no longer seen by edgy high school kids as a potential route to fame and fortune so we don't get as much crazy bullshit.

I mean. His art is pretty mediocre, with issues of same face on every character and lack of detail in the backgrounds really makes it worse.
He doesnt really improve either in his art or direction.
Like. He never did what.Shen did where Shen can go from extremely well drawn to silly in a moment

I think its not that there aren't bad webcomics. Go to the comic reddit they all fucking suck. Its that there's no big ones anymore

I can't fathom how something as cringe and autistic as the "bad webcomics wiki" has managed to survive up until now.

>it's still up
Wow, I'd think it would've been another abandoned site by now

Yeah, which is why he's just mediocre, not bad
Just because some fags circlejerk him to oblivion doesn't change that - it's their fault for having shit taste, at least Zyklon Ben can draw

Retards keep it up

I can't believe I find myself missing the days of every tom, dick, and jerry try their hand at ripping off penny arcade.

I kinda feel the same. I don't really care about the comic, but from a quick look, it's just kinda there, I guess?

Attached: 1589391391336.jpg (342x383, 29.77K)

I stopped reading this shit when I saw a page talking about a shitty vore comic, then the author started to make ridiculously clear they are a fucking vorefag and ending the article saying the main problem of the gross furry vore comic was being boring.

>the website will not allow me to copy any pictures from it
how technically incompetent do you have to be to not know about screenshots?