This is the ideal set of vowels that all languages should aspire to emulate. Distinct, well balanced, and minimalist.
Anything else, and you are bound to degenerate into a cesspool of schwas.
This is the ideal set of vowels that all languages should aspire to emulate. Distinct, well balanced, and minimalist
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
the only vowels I want to hear from danes is oooh and aaah as I anally rape them
>a cesspool of schwas
kek
Schwas are based tho. Ashes are the cringe ones. I agree that too many barely distinct vowels make for a shitty language to learn
based
where is y
>schwas
Our Y sound is not super common in languages
ona li pona tawa mi
Fuck defined vowels. Everything should be consonants and maybe some schwas. Then you can use different vowel sounds for flair purposes.
>t. Arab
So instead of a word like "Hello" your greeting could be something like "K'b'n"
And if you see someone on the street when you're walking by and don't really want to talk to them but only briefly acknowledge each other, your exchange would be like
>kbn
>kbn
Both said very quickly.
But if you're running into someone at a social event and you secretly hate each other but have to interact performatively, your interaction would be like
>kaaaaabenn
>kiboooooon
Or whatever
Any languages that fit that vowel criteria other than Spanish, Greek and Japanese?
Japanese and Greek don't fit that criteria tho
Esperanto.
Why doesn't Japanese fit it? Those are their five vowels.
Greek definitely does, just slightly less pronounced. Japan's U is a bit off, but otherwise still a good approximant.
Greek has /ɛ/, /ɔ/, and /y/ as well as a bunch of diphthongs
en.wikipedia.org
Japanese is close true, but it's still not the same as in the OP
That's the case with SerboCroatian
Also we're practically the only phonemic language
Japanese is close enough, just a rounding error. You can still tell the vowels apart easily.
>This is the ideal set of vowels that all languages should aspire to emulate. Distinct, well balanced, and minimalist.
>Anything else, and you are bound to degenerate into a cesspool of schwas.
I know this is what happened to Danish but just look at the rest of us and you'll see that our vowels are doing fine. I have no idea wtf happened to the speech of you guys, but it does sadden me.
Also a, e, i, o, u are all words as well in our language
a and o are too similar sometimes. One of them should be dropped.
Diphthongs are not vowels in and of themselves.
As for those, pretty much identical to Spanish by the standard of their ears.
Not acknowledging the existence of [ɯ̥] and [i̥] is like not acknowledging that a large number of vowels in English are actually all schwas.
>No /ɛ/
>No /ɔ/
I guess if you're going by "close enough" then sure, but that's a slippery slope that you could fit half of the world's languages under
This is better.
As long as they're all in their own section, sufficiently far apart, and only one in the bottom two sections, I'm happy.
I'd say this is based but only because I can't hear the difference between [ei]/[e] and [o]/[o̞]/[ou].
Baseret.
That's how Spanish it is.
Those voiceless vowels are just allophones tho
Modern Hebrew also fits
And? Most people say schwas but naturally think of the orthographic letter that represents it.