Is it true that French schools brainwash students into hating non-republicuck French history?

Is it true that French schools brainwash students into hating non-republicuck French history?

Attached: Albert_Lynch_-_Jeanne_d'Arc.jpg (770x1062, 1.07M)

Yes, it's like that since the 3rd republic.
Also during the 3rd republic they did a cultural genocide of all culture in france oustide of the paris culture, which was a good thing.

>which was a good thing

Maybe under the third republic, but my school curriculum covered the kingdom period, from Clovis to Louis XVI, quite impartially

No...
King Henri IV is possibly the most liked character in French history. I doubt any president could compare.

Attached: Henri IV.jpg (588x354, 38.69K)

It's a little prize to not have any large scale separatist movement.

Is it true that Anglo*d schools teach that Napoleon wasn't based and the fact that he lost wasn't dystopian?

Yes. Napoleon was a war criminal.

Forgot map.

Attached: france-langues-XV.gif (424x354, 9.42K)

T U S E R A S F R A N C A I S

Why would you want to teach french children about how their country got continuously BTFO by England

Thinking about how Joan of Arc took it up the arse in an English jail, lads.

Attached: 1593442490676.jpg (473x456, 32.04K)

D'accord Harry.

D'accord Bill.

History book covering King Louis IX (better known as Saint Louis):
"Saint Louis gave equitable justice himself, and sometimes served meals to the poor in his palace, out of charity and piety".
This isn't someone kids are gonna hate...

Attached: Saint Louis.jpg (521x380, 50.11K)

Basé.

Attached: 220px-The_evolution_of_France_under_the_third_republic_(1897)_(14759530856).jpg (220x310, 16.92K)

For all your perfidy you still lost that war...
>"but at least we burnt a little girl alive!"

We didn't burn her. But, it's nice of you to credit us. Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live and all that.

napoleon was a fucking faggot

>witch
She was canonized as a Saint

He was a hero. Took control of France in its greatest time of need, as the country was being attacked from all sides by all the great powers of Europe. He led us through this crisis with his military genius, and ensured that the ideals of the French Revolution weren't killed in their nest by the eternal Austrian and the perfidious beady eyed Anglo

kinda funny that the church recognises someone fighting the angl*ids must be a saint.

>defended france when it was being the aggressor for 20 years
>ideals which cause france to be flooded with niggers
>"""""""""""""democracy"""""""""""""

You mean like the ideals of nationalism, and the redrawing of the map of Central Europe through the Confederation of the Rhine that eventually led to the creation of your country?

>the aggressor
Wars declared by the coalition: 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th coalitions
Wars declared by France: 1st coalition(after Prussia and Austria threatened military action to squash the revolution), Peninsular War, Russian campaign

which lead to france getting btfo and my state suffering under prussian autism boot, yea that worked out well.

>indirectly provoked both world wars
Why did he meant by this?

Attached: 3452345.jpg.jpg (1642x1086, 182.97K)

not really, Louis XIV and Napoleon are shown in rather good light

>It's a little prize to not have any large scale separatist movement.
Or, treating people nice and fair would be a good thing.

Do French schools Tell them Charlemagne was a Gaullo-Latin mutt and not a pvre Franconian chad?

nope
what actually happens though is the history between the first republic and the fourth is basically skipped
pretty much never heard of napoleon III or the last kings in school

we learn he was frankish

Kek

Not fooling anyone
Napoleon was a hero who fought a series of defensive wars

The question isn't relevant now.
It was done between 1870's and 1939.

>Dreyfus was innocent!!!!

Attached: EB369F0D-E7B4-4F09-8E91-DD70E1C6FC3D.png (785x1000, 253.89K)

>The question isn't relevant now.
>It was done between 1870's and 1939.
Just overdoing it. They had railroads and shit.