Untitled

.

Attached: 64ACA8D7-22F3-4B1F-A6E1-EAC8AC656E70.jpg (828x608, 340.77K)

>Before 1959, all except 5 percent of the Tibetan population were slaves or serfs in a feudal system in which they were regarded as saleable private property, had no land or freedom, and were subject to punishment by mutilation or amputation
Damn, how could China impose their will on these helpless people?

But what if you hate both?

>this is what chinks actually believe

I like both :v)

then you're simply based

I hate the universe, time, space, existence itself.

>europeans invade and subjugate africa based on the objective of eradicating slavery
>NOOOOOOOOO, THINK ABOUT THE POOR BOOFER BLOOFER NIGGERINOS, YOU MONSTERS, YOU IMPERIALISTS, YOU'RE ONLY USING IT AS AN EXCUSE!!! COLONIALISM IN AFRICA IS THE WORST THING TO HAPPEN IN HUMAN HISTORY

>chinese commies invade and subjugate tibet based on the objective of eradicating slavery
>BASED CHINA BASED MAO, AKSHULLY CHINA LIBERATED THE TIBETAN PEOPLE LOOK SEE TIBET BAD BECAUSE OF THIS QIAO COLLECTIVE TWITTER THREAD I READ

Attached: images.png (210x240, 6K)

you unironically believe this, truly pathetic

>based on the objective of eradicating slavery
Great job with that Nige

nice argument there fatty

NOOOOOOOO!
China had to invade Tibet to remove their feudal system which had no social mobility to introduce their communist system which has no social mobility!!!

>I hate the universe, time, space, existence itself.
Same except I love cute things like cats.

Attached: 1600304234546.jpg (440x330, 99.96K)

thanks cletus

you think africans didn't stop selling slaves until british pressure forced them to do so?

>their communist system which has no social mobility
?

liberated serfs in tibet continued being proletariat laborers with low wages.

Attached: CPC.jpg (828x908, 161.75K)

>he unironically thinks that's a map of China
Amerilard education

why would anyone invade a country to end feudalism?

China isn't communist anymore, they abandoned central planning and reformed basically into a social democracy with less democracy and more back-room party dealings

No I don't think the Berlin conference had anything to do with slavery, you fucking mongoloids.

>China isn't communist
Read Deng.

holy shit read a fucking book you drooling retard, it's the very first point of the general act signed at the conference

humanitarian abolitionism was the major casus belli in the scramble for africa, the congo free state itself was initially set up under the official guise of ending the slave trade in the congo basin and the actives of zanzibari-arab slavers in the congolese interior. david livingstone's original voyages from which the entire scramble began were explicitly because he believed it was his god given mission to end slavery in africa and the main lobbies and proponents of africa's colonisation were all christian abolitionist societies

Attached: Screenshot_9.png (1694x406, 66.76K)

dont make me tap the sign

Attached: EhKzjb0X0AI0zTZ.jpg (828x533, 73.97K)

Social democracy without pensions and universal healthcare?

what did proletariat laborer feared would happen if the west overthrew his government?

No clue, what?

What did a laborer in soviet union fear would happen to him and his condition if the soviet union dissolved and the west took over as the government?

Cringe Op
Based

People defending amerikkka have no shame and know nothing about moral judgment therefore amerikkka shouldn't police other countries

Attached: RTX2K9GY.jpg (639x359, 44.3K)

Same answer dude, I have no idea, though you're asking leading questions and was going to answer yourself.