>The kings of the world are five in number and all the people of the world are their subjects. They mentioned the king of China, the king of India, the king of the Turks, the king of the Furs (Persians) and the king of the Romans (1). They referred to the king of China as the "king of humans" because the people of China are more obedient to authority and are stronger followers of government policies than all the other peoples of the world. They referred to the king of India as the "king of wisdom" because of the Indians careful treatment of sciences and their advancement in all the branches of knowledge. They referred to the king of the Turks as the "king of lions" because of the courage and the ferocity of the Turks. They referred to the king of Persia as the "king of kings" because of the richness, glory and importance of his kingdom, since Persia had subdued the kings of the center of the populated world, and because it controlled, to the exclusion of other kingdoms, the most fertile of the climatic regions. And they referred to the king of the Romans as the "king of men" because the Romans, of all the peoples, have the most beautiful faces, the best built bodies and the most robust physique.
A medieval arab on the 5 kings of the world
Other urls found in this thread:
bbc.com
twitter.com
I yearn for the day i can get a cutie brown gf.
black girls and latinas tend to have the best bodies (for me anyway, i like thick thighs and fat well shaped asses, big ol' titties and cute feet are a bonus), but even with their amazing bodies, a lot of black girls aren't very pretty. But when they are, OH BOY do I feel like stripping them completely and fucking them right in the street (consensually of course). I'd impregnate them first time, I don't even give a fuck. They just activate my reptile brain and make me happy.
true
white people (especially white girls) are the most beautiful people in the world
fpbp
notice how Chinamen were slaves even back then? nothing changes for them it seems. Soulless insects
interesting
so 'human' and 'man' are distinct concepts in Arabic?
>wet stain
>king of the Romans
TRIPALIVM FOR THAT PIECE OF SHIT! AVE RES PVBLICA, NO KING HERE!
yeah just like in english
dumb frogposter
in English they overlap; 'man' can also mean 'human', or at least it used to before feminism
Roman boypussies were in high demand
>Roman boypussies were in high demand
Considering this was written in the 11th century, Said the Andaluzian was likely not referring to the folks in Italy/Rome, but either the Eastern Roman Empire or those tribals LARPing as Romans up north.
If the former: well, Greeks being degenerates was nothing new, was it? As attested by the Latin verb "pergraecare", loosely translatable as "to behave like a drunk pederast, Greek style".
smart frogposter
he was referring to pic related. So if he was referring to anyone it would be Turks (genetic continuity) and Balkan folks.
Indians and Arabs had good relationship in past.Arabs have been trading in South before islam and this increased after Islam.
There are also some coastal communities in South who are descended from Arabs.Most of Islam,though,came from Turk and Persians.
Many fruits and vegetables in West were introduced by Arabs got it from India.Hindu-arabic numeral also reached Europe similarly
and there is a sizeable indian community in the arabian peninsula that lives here just fine. And we will continue living together in the future just fine. Although I have to say it's a shame in regards to Hindu nationalist nuts in India.
Can I download this?
Why do you think it's the shame? Hindu nationalism is a problem, but islamism that in many aspects is it's opposite that created and run Pakistan isn't? Why do you expect us to be secular when Islamism have always remained a threat to us? I always wonder why people see Islamic nations as okay, but cry about India. Why are standards so tilted?
Isn't it quite natural that after being having a traumatic partition because of muslim demand for nation based on islam, and suffering from islamic terrorism and wars for so long people would start to get defensive? Europe saw rise in right wing ideology after it suffered refugee and terror problem for a pitiful few years. It's preferable to live together peaceful, but peace comes from the effort of both communities. In India's case, we are permanently divided between India and Pakistan.
what? the pic?
except muslims don't vote for ethnic cleansing. The middle east is full of religious and ethnic minorities and proclaiming you'd persecute them is political suicide. You can be nationalist or whatever. But the extreme that Hindus are going to is fucked up. you literally call your own kind invaders, just because they are not Hindus.
Who voted for ethnic cleansing? And Pakistan, Kashmir, Bangladesh are guikty of ethnic cleansing.
India was never ever fully united in all of it's history except under the British. But even then different princes ruled different states. Regardless I still don't see your logic as to how that justifies your extreme exclusive politics religious cleansing. And you're not doing yourself a favor by claiming your following the steps of the most racist people on earth (europeans).
most hindu nationalists lowkey don’t realise what they want is basically a Hindu Pakistan. They are basically becoming the same thing they loathe (Pakistan).
Hindus voting for laws that take citizenship away from muslims. you're literally the exact same people but because the other is not Hindu you go this far. This is not how we treat native christians in the region. If a politician proclaimed he will take citizenship away from religious minorities no one would vote for him. But in India saying this will get you elected. You have some fucked up people in your country. The only people that came close to doing this in the middle east were rouge miltias during civil wars. And it's not a good look when you're being compared to ISIS. What's worse is that India is not in a state of war. This is not the work of a rouge militia. This is what the people willingly voted for in the time of peace.
You need to either show this "ethnic cleansing" claim or just keep quiet.
They do realise it. What do you think Hindu Rashtra means?
>They referred to the king of Persia as the "king of kings" because of the richness, glory and importance of his kingdom
Gilbros we won
>Hindus voting for laws
We don't vote for laws
>that take citizenship away from muslims
Partition was messy along bangladesh border and 1971 war saw massive demographic shift. North Eastern Indian who looks mongoloids demanded it, or they'll separate. The accord between them and our goverment was signed way before any Hindu Nationalist party was in power. They want neither Hindu, nor Muslims on their land. Most people in citizen removal list were infact Hindus.
>But in India saying this will get you elected.
Illegal Bangladeshis in india are a massive problem. So was them stealing cows of local people which led to rise in lynchings which media sold as beef lynchings. Polticians gets away with it because they want to remove bangladeshi, and no one wants them. Media sells it as wanting to remove muslims. There are 200 million Muslims in india. No one can remove them anywhere.
Not saying Hindu nationalist are muslim well wishers, but your problems with India stems mostly from reading skewed journalism about India.
if you have retarded pakis as neighbours you will understand our plight
honestly not one islamic people are as retarded as them, they will remain poor but also will never let other countries to grow either, its like a pest
What about your campaign against Sikhs?
Which campaign?
well I might be mislead. Any which state are you guys from?
>your campaign against Sikhs?
You have no idea what you're speaking about, do you?
Maybe he is referring to the one from the 80s. I think this the story that had something to do with Punjabi Sikh separatists but I might wrong.
>your problems with India stems mostly from reading skewed journalism about India.
don't bother, eyerabs are babies. They believe anything
Not saying Hindu extremists in the North Cow belt are the good guys, the illegal Bengali immigrants from Bangladesh are shifting the demography in West Bengal and other eastern states. You can find them literally everywhere, even in southern India.
Why do we have 200mil muslims if we're so barbaric kek. See pic rel. We don't even have uniform civil code. Absolute state of this c*cked nation.
>Any which state are you guys from?
Andhra
>they are babies. They believe anything
this applies to your people and nation lmao
just read what you linked, user. It wasn't >our campaign. It was the Congress Party's(opposition rn) campaign. And it was more complicated than just a anti sikh riots.
>The Congress-led central government dismissed the Punjab state government (led by their party), invoking the president's rule. During the five months before Operation Blue Star, from 1 January to 3 June 1984, 298 people were killed in violent incidents across Punjab. In the five days preceding the operation, 48 people were killed by violence.[43]:175 According to government figures, in the violent events leading up to the Operation Blue Star since the inception of Akali Dharm Yudh Morcha, the militants had killed 165 Hindus and Nirankaris, and even 39 Sikhs opposed to Bhindranwale were killed. The total number of deaths was 410 in violent incidents and riots while 1,180 people were injured.[20]
I'm not calling you guys barbaric. I'm just saying your social politics are fucked even when compared to the middle east (we're no where as divided as you).
>Andhra
that's the southeast right? from my understanding the southeast of India is the region with no muslims or any religious minority for that matter. Don't misunderstand me I'm not saying it's bad I'm saying it's not diverse. Correct me if I'm wrong.
It wasn't "our"campaign. It was between sikhs and congress party led by pretty much a dictator. Hindu nationalist party are pretty critical of the event, maybe not out of goodwill. Hindus also hate the event. Congress party later had a sikh as PM of india and won many elections in Punjab, but they've never accepted the full responsibility and still protect their people.
rip
I see thx
Blue star and the anti Sikh riots after. Your cartel of wiki editors keep trying to censor this.
Then there is the fact they are massively overrepresented in the people leaving India.
And I have seen even here on int the mask off hindu posting against them