How do we go from this

How do we go from this....

Attached: 5a25c48105f7115ff9219b9a6d12c805[1].jpg (1920x1080, 242.98K)

Attached: 1555563446673.jpg (877x500, 39.06K)

TO THIS

Attached: scene.jpg (3840x1596, 935.01K)

Marry, kill, fuck

They weren't even that hot aside from Lucy Liu. Diaz is an overrated slag that was hot in The Mask and then hit the wall 2 minutes after filming wrapped. Drew Barrymore is a junkie butterface who got by on pure nepotism.

If you want good hot badass girl kino watch pic related

Attached: doa_dead_or_alive_movie_poster.jpg (528x755, 81.7K)

TO THIS???

Attached: 71NuRWz3oWL._AC_SY606_[1].jpg (413x606, 44.3K)

The funny thing is this version was owned and produced by women, it was basically Drew's passion project and made her a bundle of money. It didn't fail because it didn't try and pander to a tiny portion of the population.
Virtually no one wants tough female stories and no one wants feminist films.

Attached: D5cwvR-WkAA4DyT.jpg (1125x563, 91.47K)

Soullless
SOUL

What we really need is a Totally Spies movie

>Virtually no one wants tough female stories
Not even true famalam, people just don't like ham fisted political nonsense.

Buffy worked because it wasn't about a girl trying to smash the patriarchy, the metaphors were just about how much highschool sucked and growing up was hard. The chilling Adventures of Sabrina sucks because it's just about how the principal is responsible if a female student gets molested even if she won't tell anyone who did it.

Marry, kill, fuck

Hahahaha fucking disgusting!

>Not even true famalam, people just don't like ham fisted political nonsense.
That's probably more accurate. The original remake movies were basically tough girl movies though they still kept their femininity and there was no bullshit about them being oppressed and feeling like they need to rise up against the patriarchy. They were strong, capable women and that didn't need to be highlighted or addressed.

Lucy Liu is so sexy

you're clearly confused, get off this board and seek help

Typical bimbo Instagram Kardashian wanabees on the left and in the middle.

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [00.52-01.20].webm (1280x533, 3M)

I can't say for sure, I don't tend to watch too many 'franchised' films and female remakes almost always are. Definitely the ones from the last few years but there didn't seem to be female remakes before the 'stronk independent woman' thing.

Honestly even female lead movies from just the last few years were met with acclaim like Arrival. It really is a matter of content, and to some degree saturation. There have always been 'strong' females like Ripley from Alien, but they exist more in TV because Television has always had an easier time catering to women. It's why netflix is such a popular thing with females, its catered more and more to them over the years because they are their biggest demographic. Women have always been less likely to go see a movie and usually just tag along with men.

Even when it comes to the female lead remakes with ham fisted plots they would probably do better if they did one a year instead of 1 a month. It's just too oversaturated, especially since the theme is exactly the same each time now instead of being diverse in its story telling and just happening to star women.

Arrival, Colossal, and Annihilation take gender into account when showcasing their characters actions and motives, but the themes themselves aren't about being a woman like in charlies angels or terminator dark fate. Arrival is just a question about free will, Colossal is about alcoholism, Annihilation is about self destruction.

It wasn't just 'women stronk, men oppressive' over and over again.

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [01.33-01.41].webm (1920x800, 2.99M)

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [04.46-04.51].webm (1920x800, 2.99M)

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [09.34-09.54].webm (1280x533, 2.98M)

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [18.32-18.37].webm (1920x800, 2.99M)

God. How annoying.

The only thing that didn't change was that all 6 "girls" are trannies IRL.

Was that really the best take they had? The headbutt doesn't look even remotely convincing.

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [26.49-26.59].webm (1920x800, 3M)

>What we really need is a Totally Spies movie
made anywhere except Hollywood

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [33.15-33.28].webm (1920x800, 3M)

honestly you replace kristen with lucy and that three is hotter

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [43.36-43.43].webm (1920x800, 2.99M)

wasn't this dood in Beerfest?

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [1.02.50-1.03.08].webm (1920x800, 2.99M)

is this real ? is this the real cast ?

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [1.10.11-1.10.16].webm (1920x800, 2.94M)

They didn't even bother to go to a field and film that did they? Its a composite with cgi background. I doubt the actors were even in the same room together.
disgusting

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [1.20.14-1.20.22].webm (1920x800, 2.92M)

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [1.31.03-1.31.19].webm (1920x800, 3M)

All three are butt ass ugly. Jesus Christ. YUCK no sex appeal what so ever.

Attached: Charlies Angels 2019 [1.31.24-1.31.30].webm (1920x800, 2.78M)