Can we agree these are pretty mediocre at best?

Can we agree these are pretty mediocre at best?

Attached: prequelthumb_fmpye8.jpg (1280x720, 87.47K)

No. They are shit and I will never cede any territory beyond that

shit movies, TCW show makes them look even worse and less believable.

Bingo

fpbp every single time

No. They are incredible works of art. The fact that you're all still butt hurt over a decade later is fucking amazing. How much time of your life have you wasted on this?

Checked

Attached: palpachad.png (1000x1000, 943.37K)

/thread

So you'll all be back for the next one in 20 minutes?

no they are based beyond belief

Attached: lucas.png (429x552, 397.24K)

based

Attached: 1577279291545.jpg (587x900, 94.55K)

>Shakespearean masterpiece
>mediocre

Attached: Darth Zion.png (1008x2130, 1.42M)

2 and 3 are top tier but 1 is shit and dragging them down so together they are mediocre, yes

The only flaw is the dated CGI

Fight me

all of star wars is pretty mediocre

and the horrific dialogue. so i guess it's main detractions are how everything looks and what everyone says

otherwise great tho

better than the ots :^)

>and the horrific dialogue

Compared to the dialogue of the Sequels, they're a masterpiece.

>B-B-BUT THE SEQUELS
Poorly-made schlock does not excuse other poorly-made schlock,

If we go by that braindead comparison, then almost every film ever made is a masterpiece.

The cgi looks great though

The CGI in Attack of The Clones is literally vomit-inducing.

You need new eyes

Attached: Battle of Geonosis.webm (936x400, 2.28M)

yes but they're still better than 7-9

Honestly, I'd forgotten just how incredible it looks. You're right user, I was wrong.

Attached: Battle of Geonosis2.webm (936x400, 2.18M)

Attached: Battle of Geonosis3.webm (936x400, 2.89M)

>Space craft much turbulent
>Keep light sabre ignited
>facepalm.jpg

Attached: Battle of Geonosis4.webm (936x400, 2.85M)

Attached: Battle of Geonosis5.webm (936x400, 2.76M)

this so much

Attached: cartoon network screencap.jpg (1920x1080, 115.02K)

yeah, still better than the original trilogy or sequel trilogy.
>nooo muh incest cuckold love triangle because George retconned the story like 5 times.

imagine unironically legitimately caring about starshit lmao

Just think 7 year sbefor ethis we had the cgi monkeys in jumanji, George is a visionary, not even counting Lucasarts having a role in some of the first 3d animation ever made.

Yes, If we can agree the Disney's abominations make them look like masterpieces.

Can someone explain this type of mental gymnastics?

It's as if Disney made even worse Marvel capeshit sequels in a few decades and you suddenly praise Captain Marvel as a cinematic masterpiece.

reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it? The piles of steaming shit that Disney put out made the prequels, as bad as they were, look like great movies. Is that plain enough for you?