Why do Americans love bombing children's hospitals and schools?
Why do Americans love bombing children's hospitals and schools?
Other urls found in this thread:
businessinsider.nl
twitter.com
The profiteers need their revenue
because we’re idiots
out of jealousy for their low healthcare cost and tuition fees
The military industrial complex needs its profits and dumb amerimutts will gladly sacrifice their lives and limbs to fuel it.
>The brice of freebom
>The military industrial complex needs its profits and dumb amerimutts will gladly sacrifice their lives and limbs to fuel it.
The American economy used to be based completely around this in the cold war, it's too late to change now.
I work in the "defense" industry and can confirm this. The size of the contracts for these weapon systems are massive and generate a lot of profit. Plus the geopolitical benefits that come with being able to military coerce anyone who doesn't follow the American diplomatic line. Sorry world...
They are jealous a shitskin kid in a muslim shithole has better medical attention and doesn't go bankrupt in the process
Endless wars for endless profits to a small number of rich people. Why did people think America was the good side of the cold war again?
what a good argument for burning down the whole american society
affordable or public healthcare and education? Yeah bomb 'em
This picture is so depressing
I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it.
Stop being a puppet of the Great Satan.
protect against whom exactly?
Israel wills it.
Everyone who is not a retard doesn't think so
it's their tradition
>Why do Americans love bombing children's hospitals and schools?
Ask your neighbor and the Syrians since they've most recently have been doing it.
I'm not disagreeing but didn't your country and the English fight a war for 100 years.
>yemen
>libya
>iraq
>afghanistan
>vietnam
>korea
>cambodia
Yeah...
Short heada
Culture of kill
at least they have the decency of bombing their own countries
That was more like an Afghan father and son fighting the US in this war. Since it was England invading France.
When did I ever decide or state that was a good thing? Where in the text was there a fucking HINT of aggression.
he didn't imply it schizo
Where in my text was there a hint of aggression?
I didn't say you said it was a good thing
>Why did people think America was the good side of the cold war again?
>the Soviets didnt wage war
>the Soviets didnt arm governments and rebels involved in wars
Sure thing. The Soviets meanwhile continually invaded their allies. I'd also point out that you can generally tell the bad guy when they have such large numbers of people fleeing to the point that they have to actively stop it.
>funding fascists is the same as funding revolutionaries
rent free
I didn't like trump but I liked his non-interventionism, now with biden we're probably going to get dragged into syria and iran
I can wait to raise the blm flag over tehran
yes
gotta bomb something
I'd prefer they bomb ghettos here, but oh well
So Syria is part of Russia?
yeah but communism is good for humanity so they get a pass, you do it for profit
>my anti government rebels are different from your anti government rebels
based balkan immigrant
Syria invited the Russians, they have sovereignty on their country
Thr comment wasn't about sides it was that we have had many wars where fathers, sons, grandsons, etc. fight in the same war. Afghanistan has basically been in one civil war since 1979.
Yes. Imagine thinking all ideologies have the same value.
The only reason Trump was anti-interventionist was because he thought it was not profitable. But he was completely wrong on that
usa is evil and imperialist
>Thr comment wasn't about sides it was that we have had many wars where fathers, sons, grandsons, etc. fight in the same war.
I don't think so. If your country is being invaded I don't think it would be sad to see multiple generations fight for it. There's not much of a choice there imo, either you fight or your country is conquered. Being the invader is different since the invader won't get conquered just by giving up, so an invader continuing the fight is more a choice. It's like how we can Vietnam a quagmire for the American military but no one calls it an quagmire for North Vietnam.
when's the last time they even did that?
Communism has unironically starved and executed far more of it's people than capitalist countries in the same time frames. Wars killed less than were starved. It also managed to pollute it's nations environments worse than capitalistic countries. At the end of the day the people and the environment serve the party power structure even if it means their own destruction.
>The only reason Trump was anti-interventionist was because he thought it was not profitable
the main reason was sheer incompetence businessinsider.nl
Around 100 million people died due to capitalist imperialist wars between the years 1914-1945, so you're wrong. Also 9 million people die each year due to starvation in capitalist countries because it is not profitable to feed the poor. Also, you're an American settler, so you should leave your stolen land.