All others failed.
The only people to defeat the Romans were Scottish people and Germans
Other urls found in this thread:
cambridge.org
twitter.com
Good, now stop importing third worlders into your country nigel they are destroying your culture.
>explains it in simple terms
>the brain dead injun still misunderstands
Well there's the Parthians, for a start.
?
Write that in Gaulish for me.
>what destroyed rome I wonder?
>Who cares, just keep importing foreigners nothing can go wrong
Re-read my first line.
Then re-read your line.
Can you write that in briton?
>?
?
There you go.
*whoosh*
You can't even write a sentence in it. You lost. ROMAN BRED GAUL
No since 0 of my ancestors are Britons.
Everyone in the british isle are celtic
this Parthians successfully defended themselves too
>posts about how barbarians defeated rome
>is currently importing barbarians
What do you not understand?
You called me English thick cunt.
>everyone in Scandinavia is Germanic so they should speak German
That's the equivalent of what you just said.
that is also what you said to the french user then
*blocks your path*
No it isn't. Celtic is a large language group that had dozens of languages then you said "since Britain had Celtic people they all spoke one language". Think before you post.
All of that area spoke relate dialects
Gaelic bares little resemblance to British.
Umm sweaty...
No, I called you a United Kingdomian. Evn SNP is pro migrant, which I still do not understand.
because it is not brythonic it is gealic, the geals migrated a little later from ireland
That's been disproved centuries ago.
proof?
Not counting the Parthians
Not counting the Sassanids who nearly rekt'd them
Your ignorance is astonishing
If porridge wogs and germ men are so great than why do I have hemochromatosis?
cambridge.org
"To summarize, if there was a mass migration from Ireland to Scotland, there should be some sign of this in the archaeological record, but there is none. If there was only an elite takeover by a warband, who must have adopted local material culture and settlement forms, there should be signs of the language of the native majority in the placenames, but again there is none. A purely dynastic takeover would not have led to language change on the scale seen, no clear historical backing."
Huh I didn't know that well fought brit I will definitly read this now it's quite interesting
You are welcome.
/.