>this was state of the art CGI in 1999
This was state of the art CGI in 1999
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Soul
Did she got raped in that scene or what
DONT TELL THAT TIGHTASS ANYTHING
a bug's life aged better and is the superior film
What scene?
>ants fucking die
>dialogues with explicit sexual content
>philosphical scenes
>fucking Woody Allen
And retards at that time compared it to Bugs and said both were intended for children
where Weaver wont tell the General where Z is so they show the guards crowd around the girl and you hear moans off screen
1999 huh.
better than halo infinite
No it wasn't.
Regardless, the animation still holds up today because it's as good is it needs to look. No more detail required.
Looks cool
It looks like shit and you know it. From an art design perspective, the characters in Antz are hideous and unlikeable.
Don't tell me what 'i know' you narcissistic mental midget. People are entitled to their own arguments, regardless of you. At least i offered a some what objective one. All you've done is express your own distaste for an aesthetic from an 'artistic perspective' - which is totally arbitrary.
ANTZ > Bugs life
>trusting 'Nice Guy" rico
whats your point?
Just clicked past the original Shrek made in 2001 on TV. Holy shit it has aged badly.
For 1999 that's pretty good. Also Toy Story for 1995 or whatever it was looks amazing.
>Ctrl V*
>Ctrl V*
>Ctrl V*
>Ctrl V*
Man, this was state of the art back in 1999
That's the point though
That's his point, Toy Story looked far better than whatever this movie is (Ants? Bugs Life?) and it came out 4 years prior
>why do identical houses look the same??
That was the joke, like medieval suburbia. Then Turkey went and actually did it.
Looks like complete shit.
yeah, hence why they are making fun of it