IT'S OUT

Attached: gwagwaga.png (1262x816, 732.91K)

Other urls found in this thread:

academic.oup.com/qje/article/127/2/1017/1826107
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

"It's out" threads should be an automatic permaban

>sheiiiiit you be saying i can just say my brotha dindu nuffin?

>shitting on joe rogan
jealous faggot

People say something like this and then conclude it is definitely because racism. Why is that?

>Blacks are strongly tribal; a negro cannot be trusted to enact justice against his kin, as he has an inherent bias in favor of his people over any other
- John Oliver

Jesus Christ, when did he get like this?

I didn't know John Oliver was based

Attached: Dul5va3WoAAzkgq.jpg (576x288, 35.66K)

why are so many convicts male? clearly there is a bias to put men away, the same way black people are put away.

Even the New York Times published an op-ed written by a Jewish scientist which basically said "Yeah, there's something to this 'race realism' thing, but let's be careful about it."

why are white leftists so evil bros?

the show got a whole lot better when they removed the audience.

Their brains were primed to default to race.

They're functionally a religion, and an extremely grotesque one at that.

At least they stopped pretending it's comedy

Attached: download.jpg (183x275, 11.75K)

Add one black and suddenly they can no longer convict career criminals

Liberals then wonder why the police don’t solve their problems

Also even more disgusting than juries are female judges
Probation for murder or rape is a normal sentence for negros

Says the guy who hasn't made anyone laugh in over 20 years.

The dangers of typecasting

OY. I TELL YA. DIS BLOKE... DONAL DRUMPF... HE HAS NO RESPECT FOR ANYONE OR ANYTHING... IM BEGINNIN TO FINK DAT DIS DRUMPF BLOKE DOESNT UNDERSTAND BASIC HUMAN KINDNESS! *LETS OUT BIG DEPRESSED SIGH AND FIGHTS BACK TEARS* WELL.... THATS OUR SHOW TONIGHT... PLEASE... STAY STRONG AND STAY SAFE.... WE AS A NATION WILL GET THRU THIS... REMEMBER TO VOTE.... PLEASE VOTE THIS NOVEMBER AND URGE YOUR MAILMAN TO MAIL IN YOUR VOTES FOR BIDEN IN TIME... WE CAN DEFEAT THIS EVIL WHITE VIRUS... GOODNIGHT... AND GOD BLESS

Attached: oliverblm.jpg (1296x730, 627.75K)

>not ending with "god save the queen"
missed opportunity.

But it is because of racism

Are the test done by the HILLARY 99% Statisticians? I’d love to see how the data is pulled and what the selection process was like regarding the crimes. Just the n would be satisfactory to me.

Nice non-argument there.

Brace for the influx of Euros telling you that juries are stupid without evening trying to understand the benefit of them.

What's to argue with, he posted his opinion on comedy, and he's not funny. This isn't some kind of factual debate.

The black community famously celebrates violent criminals.
Just look at the parties they hold whenever a violent felon returns from prison, or the murals of famous "martyrs" who were violent felons like George Floyd.

That would explain it.

>This article examines the impact of jury racial composition on trial outcomes using a data set of felony trials in Florida between 2000 and 2010. We use a research design that exploits day-to-day variation in the composition of the jury pool to isolate quasi-random variation in the composition of the seated jury, finding evidence that (i) juries formed from all-white jury pools convict black defendants significantly (16 percentage points) more often than white defendants, and (ii) this gap in conviction rates is entirely eliminated when the jury pool includes at least one black member. The impact of jury race is much greater than what a simple correlation of the race of the seated jury and conviction rates would suggest. These findings imply that the application of justice is highly uneven and raise obvious concerns about the fairness of trials in jurisdictions with a small proportion of blacks in the jury pool.

academic.oup.com/qje/article/127/2/1017/1826107

Attached: 1586569968172.jpg (828x581, 192.57K)

>Because all felony trials in Florida other than capital trials have six-member juries, we exclude capital trials from our analysis. Because each jury should have six members plus up to two alternates, we drop those cases with fewer than six jurors/alternates identified in the data and those with more than eight. We also drop those cases with multiple defendants and those in which the defendant names do not match the online record (i.e., in Lake County).17 We are left with a data set of 785 felony jury trials, 401 of which are from Sarasota County and 384 from Lake County. Our analysis focuses on the 712 trials in which the main dependent variables are defined and the defendant is identified as being either black (n = 333) or white (n = 379).

>juries formed from all-white jury pools convict black defendants significantly (16 percentage points) more often than white defendants
This "finding" implies all defendants are equally innocent/guilty.

Give me a tl;dr

See The whole study is entirely bunk.

this, the core of it is rotten, not even beginning to address the fact that it's one study from two counties in florida with the only variables being jury size.
they didn't sort by crime, by prior convictions, by anything.
they also excluded capital crimes as well as crimes with multiple defendants.
it would be interesting to see the data on this, unfortunately this study is not it.

They didn't even check whether the "one black juror" was the one with the dissenting opinion.

When measuring the gap they control for those factors.
Idiot.

They only say that because they present themselves as the superior race

Don't you pathetic micro dicked right wingers get tired of whinging about people not being bootlicking supporters of racial inequity?

John Oliver is fucking hilarious and is much more funny and popular and rich than YOU or any other knuckle dragging fascist could ever be. Seethe, cry, etc. but try maybe shutting the fuck up for a change when people try to right wrongs

Attached: 1597636295175.jpg (588x823, 72.28K)

they massaged their result by dropping a bunch of data on arbitrary grounds


tl;dr - lies, damned lies and statistics

They do NOT control for prior convictions, liar.
academic.oup.com/qje/article/127/2/1017/1826107

this is interesting.
both races had the same conviction rates overall

Attached: Screenshot (529).png (629x249, 19.72K)

That seems like cope on your part. Not Jewish btw.

can you even do that? seems like it would be illegal or not recorded in the first place

>not knowing what statistics actually mean
You are literally the cancer.