/film/

Previous thread: Thread for the intellectual discussion of arthouse and classic cinema.

/film/ Literature - mega.nz/folder/KvgWTKjQ#rGWJZs0ihnviBKDM9yxwJw
/film/ Charts - mega.nz/folder/g2gBzCpY#-z-2TvXS-CvoKE_VTLR0qw

Attached: 1590012593907.jpg (990x1001, 111.24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WJj9-t2A-_o
youlebe.com/play/HanYe-4-1.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>women in the OP
BASED AS FUCK

Attached: 1575655813031.png (1545x2155, 1.86M)

Stop posting women you cringy gay faggot. Women are only of interests for faggots. Real heterosexual men are interested in men's bodies, men's aesthetic and progressive development of their own body. You are a fucking faggot.

Need old but lewd. Wanna see some titties and ass in black and white tonight.

Another webmless thread

NOOOOO YOU CANT JUST PUT A HECKIN WOMAN IN THE OP!!!!! YOU'RE GONNA DO ME A FRIGHTEN!!!!!

Attached: 1548391564705.png (272x204, 22.11K)

>Here's your In the Mood for Love restoration bro. Piss filter? Nah, just your screen bro.
youtube.com/watch?v=WJj9-t2A-_o

>Thread for the intellectual discussion of arthouse and classic cinema.
Should it just be general discussion of arthouse and classic cinema instead? Too much pretentious shitflinging going on in these threads.

agree

Attached: 1592103973204.webm (1204x1080, 2.98M)

Reposting, so retardation does not get the last laugh.

It wasn't fan-fiction, it was a satirical attack.
What did I imitate?
Yeah and I reccomended Moonflet to you, bitch.
I don't remember your posts on Spione, but you seem to take this life out of films with these systematic conflations of their ideals, ignoring aesthetic, acting, and the inarticulatable expression inherent to the medium.
And you've yet to comment on Pasolini

Try reddit.

If you think anything posted in these threads is anywhere close to being pretentious then you need to go back to upvote land immediately

Cringe

Attached: 1571171254449.webm (448x480, 2.95M)

why didnt Gable just fuck her right then and there

he did eventually

Attached: 1582527459754.webm (720x480, 2.73M)

why did actors and actresses back then all seem to be like fucking titans? Someone worth looking up to, to say the least.

Me, personally? I love when /film/ threads have women in the OP, nakes my peepee go BOI-YOI-YOI-YOI-YOIIIIING!!!!!

Because movies back then made them larger than life. The movies were about the characters and not shitty CGI action garbage.

what did they mean by this?

>aesthetic, acting, and the inarticulatable expression inherent to the medium.
Already been discussed ad-nauseum. But not direct intent since most reviewers don’t have symbolic context. And the discussion of it is a creation in and of itself playing on consistent themes to greater realize thorough line of intent. It’s a meta-creation in and of itself. It’s not real or something as simple as this film is about this stupid allegorical thing. And you didn’t recommend me anything, more fan fiction. I’ve seen Pasolini’s Mathew and turned it off when he played that cheesy blues song during the baptism of Jesus by John. Finished it later and it was just okay
>aesthetic, acting, and the inarticulatable expression inherent to the medium.
I really just find a lot of that discussion boring and kind of simple and not fun

4k blu ray disc, or just a 4k remaster?

Remaster. Will come out on the Criterion boxset eventually.

Attached: 1588876865103.webm (720x480, 2.89M)

Was that really it? I meant as people themseleves. You can name an actor and actress from the golden age and find a bunch of biographies on them.

Why is it so green?

Hulk farted on the film reels

Imagine the smell

Because people at L'Immagine Ritrovata are fucking retarded and their restorations always have a fucking piss filter.

Yes I told you Moonfleet, keep seething.
That's early Pasolini, Teorema and Salo are better.

But that's what the medium is, the rest is just you reading things into incidential decisions. It's not literature, and is not expressed through words. It's a manipulation of images to fit an agenda, or create a sensation, the rest is unproductive. That is why Wavelength is a great film, or Mauvais Sang.

youlebe.com/play/HanYe-4-1.html

I found Han Ye. It's in the cloudcast tab, but I don't know how to get that on my mac.

Can blaxploitation be /film/?

Attached: truck-turner.jpg (640x503, 105.17K)

maybe they do that because people associate film with color casts now, when it isn't always the case

Wrong version

No, they're retarded.

The Cloudcast one is the 1955 one

1. Inception
2. Love Exposure
3. RedLine
4. The prestige
5. the Dark Knight
6. Lucky Number Slevin
7. the Matrix Sequels
8.lotr
9.requiem for a dream
10. 500 Days of Summer
How's my pleb status?

need a fucking badass/weird/awesome chinese film to watch tonight. any recs?

watch Chong Chang Ching Chong Pong Pang (1999)

No you’re pretending you looked into the eyes of a giant but you only smelled his passing fart. I recommended Moonfleet I did something! No.
>manipulation of images to fit an agenda, create a sensation
This is incidental and just repeating what millions of others have said before. No film is not a lever drug system. And especially with Lang the decision behind certain directed elements are more directly conscious. Film is not physic automatism. That is revisionist closed off distraction like hiding in a closet or something and refusing to even feel around for any sort of concrete material. Just pretend the concrete doesn’t exist and the only thing that’s real is whatever you make up inside your own mind. Or the way it effects you internally Literally Platonic. You couldn’t be more unproductive

I don't see it

kung fu hustle

>7. the Matrix Sequels
That's two films retard

Yes and Inception is from 2010. His list won't be counted anyways.

pick anyone of them, reloaded i guess.