People would flip their shit if Kids was released today

People would flip their shit if Kids was released today

Attached: file.png (640x939, 1.07M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_(film)
theguardian.com/film/2015/jun/22/harmony-korine-kids-20th-anniversary
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

mid90s?

No they wouldn't.

Should have been called AIDS

they should, the director should be in jail for what he did to children

People flipped their shit back then.

*Zig Forums would flip their shit if Kids was released today

Kids didn't glorify it's subject matter. In fact it was rather critical of the adult themes portrayed and had a very strong message of "warning" about what can happen when kids attempt to adopt roles and practices that they were not mature enough yet to adopt.

If you think Kids has literally any similarities to that Netflix abomination, you're an idiot.

This

>Kids didn't glorify it's subject matter. In fact it was rather critical of the adult themes portrayed and had a very strong message of "warning" about what can happen when kids attempt to adopt roles and practices that they were not mature enough yet to adopt.
So like Cuties?

No we didn't.

Chloe Sevigny is a stinking whore

You weren't even born yet when it was released

Cuties was a celebration of degeneracy, and if you believe otherwise you're either being intentionally obtuse or are a moron.

It's weird how much Zig Forums changed with Trump's election. I remember back in 2014 when they would claim that age of consent was a meme invented by feminist and how dating underage girls was "trad" or whatever, and now they're losing their shit over some flick about kids dancing

shit was flipped when it was released as well. the only difference is you personally didn't see it.

So you didn't watch it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_(film)

>>The film generated a massive controversy upon its release in 1995 and caused much public debate over its artistic merit. It received an NC-17 rating from the MPAA, but was released without a rating. Critical response was mixed, and the film grossed $20.4 million on a $1.4 million budget.

Didn't need to.

Ok, retard

KIDS is Brutal.

All the main characters get AIDS and/or raped by the end.

main difference is that kids was made for teenagers around the age of the main characters whereas cuties was not made for 10-11y/o girls (since it's rated TV-MA)

Hey, you stole my goodbye!

I guess I can got get real children, film them stripping and twerk half naked, and just say it’s commentary so it’s not child porn then.

malding

there's a difference between having girls married off at a reasonable age when their bodies are ready to bear children like has been done for thousands of years before feminism, and having clearly prepubescent children who are not of childbearing age acting like whores.

I'm 40
Thanks for nothing

>Zig Forums would flip their shit if Kids was released today
fixd

Go back to Twitch faggot

spring breakers came out recen.....
8 years ago no one flipped shit over that movie.
I thought kids was just some low budget movie by some people who grew up in the inner city. After watching spring breakers i realized its just the directors pedo fantasy.

post2016 would flip its shit if it was released today.

Bunch of hysterical moralfags

filtered

Yeah haha totally, it’s not just to show teens having sex lol.

Correct
theguardian.com/film/2015/jun/22/harmony-korine-kids-20th-anniversary
Yes they did you dishonest zoomer shitter

Post your ID, SSN, and credit card information to prove it otherwise shut the fuck up zoomer.

Attached: avrillavigne.jpg (334x475, 37.49K)

Euphoria came out what a year ago? And the only people complaining were Zig Forums...

unironically this

Nigga please, Euphoria is Less Than Zero some 25 years too late. It's got nothing of either of the 2 movies.

This was my life in the 90’s and I miss it so much.

The film didn’t have artistic merit.
Larry Clark has really only directed one good movie, and that’s ‘Another Day in Paradise’.
The quality of that likely had to do with the cast, which included James Woods, Melanie Griffith, Vincent Kartheiser, and Natasha Gregson Wagner, all of whom had way more film experience than Clark.
The film was also written by Christopher Landon, Michael Landon’s son, so even the writer had way more experience.