now that the dust has settled, who was in the wrong here?
Now that the dust has settled, who was in the wrong here?
clearly George for eating out of the garbage like a dog
George
If the trashcan was open the whole time he might have an argument, but it was sealed in the garbage in all the garbage air, so it's officially trash at that point. He's eating trash.
>Eating out of a bin
Not gonna lie, bros. Even if it wasn't touching anything I couldn't do it.
the only possible harm would be to himself, so he didnt wrong anybody
Adjacent to refuse is refuse
there's obviously just newspapers and magazines in that bin, nothing that would make the air inside the bin smell bad
what if it was a recycle bin someone else mistook for the trash and there was nothing in there with the eclair BUT magazines/newspapers? I see no "stinky" trash in the webm.
wrong, allowing trash eating would be normalizing it encouraging others to do it who may not have which is bad for group survival because you don't want a bunch of trash eaters dragging down the group.
george for not making sure to not be caught
George. You don't eat anything out of the trash can. It's just the rules, like you can't eat something in the fridge if it has someone's name on it.
You can't know that, there's clearly two feet of trash under the magazines holding them up
I only see newspapers beneath the magazine
You think theres a 2 feet tall stack of magazines in that trashcan, and nothing else?
the paper blocks the smell from beneath
and that eclair couldn't have been sitting there for so long that it would taint the taste
George
There's no excuse for eating someone else's leftovers out of the garbage, in their own home no less. An eclair is 95 fucking cents, if you really want one then stop at a donut shop on the way home
>The kitchen trash can definitely only has newspapers in it and not rotting scraps of food
like I said it could be a paper recycle bin whoever threw the eclair out didn't check first.
They're literally cleaning up after eating, it's all trash at that point. I wouldn't pull out a magazine and read it either, because that's also trash.
He crossed the line between man and bum
I just watched this episode last night, what the fuck
if it was war and he hadnt eaten for 6 days and were starwin or on a diet, then george did not do rong
sugar is a hell of drug
what american food is that? a snickers?
You faggots can argue about this all but its just two sides of the same coin. The truth of the situation is that there was nothing wrong with the act of eating the doughnut from the top of the trash but the act of eating a doughnut that had already had a bit taken out of it is reprehensible.
>eat trash
>get the covid
>spread it to everyone and millions die
Sometimes personal harm is the harm of everyone.
It's French
bunch of little prissy boys who have probably never struggled in their lives in this thread.
Animals get off eating raw fucking meat and you wont dare touch an eclair that was sitting on a magazine?
jesus, men these days
>Amerisharts throw their used plates in the bin
Do they really? wtf
he was obviously going to scrape the leftovers from the plates into the bin
>britbongs reuse their silverware
Please don't tell yuropoors really do this.
>Animals get off eating raw fucking meat and you wont dare touch an eclair that was sitting on a magazine?
I try to have higher standards than literal animals.
>being so poor you have to re-use paper plates
Oof.
He was already in the wrong for eating someone else's leftovers.
George for eating it out of the garbage like that.
Can a Boomer explain this one to me?
I know that you're not supposed to shit where you eat but why did he get fired? That's just a piece of advice, not a rule and defenitely not an obvious one.
George. Even though it was laid nicely at the top, it was still thrown away and it is now trash. Maybe the original owner took a bite and then dropped it on the floor, or maybe it went bad. Trash is trash.