Does this really have the most disturbing ending of all time like every journalist says?
Does this really have the most disturbing ending of all time like every journalist says?
the remake is better because the good guy wins and the bad guy loses.
for the time it aired, sure
it would help if the 'hero' wasn't a fucking retard
this one's better
it has the most authentic portrayal of a psychopathic killer i've ever seen. "most disturbing ending" is a very subjective and pointless argument. the ending is uniquely terrifying (in that no other movie has terrified me in that particular way) and the film itself is absolute kino.
There's nothing disturbing about it. He gets what he deserves for being a complete retard.
>beautiful
what's important is the main girl is
I found the ending of Irreversible more traumatizing. The happyness got destroyed and can't undo whatever happened.
Not to derail but grave of the fireflies wins that, it's perfectly depressing not one sliver of hope and at the end you liked noone not even the main characters
Imo, the beginning is even more disturbing once you've seen the film. It is very symbolic and uses abstract cinematography to detail the foreboding events.
No, the ending isn't logical because the husband drinks the poison instead raping and killing the bad guy. The best part of the movie though was the flashback scene where he jumps from a balcony.
>let's be reasonable, why don't you just lie down and die
>ok
this thread is really symptomatic for the state of this board:
OP is basically asking if the movie is good and the entire thread is split between people spoiling the ending and people complaining about the ending because they are midwits
>it's perfectly depressing not one sliver of hope and at the end you liked noone not even the main characters
Watch Ken Russell's The Devils. It beats your Chinese cartoon to the ground with depressive ending devoided of any hope.
no but it is certified kino
i didn't know there was a remake, please tell me you're joking about the ending
>OP is basically asking if the movie is good
people who can't form their own opinions deserve to be spoiled
Welcome to the pit of voles that is Zig Forums.
>THEY SAY THE ENDING IS DISTURBING ARE THEY RIGHT?
>discuss the ending
Oh my god it's real. AMERICA WHY ARE YOU LIKE THIS
One would think that brainlests wouldn't even know this movie exists, but that's where one would be wrong.
MC did what he did in the end because he was obsessed with uncovering the truth. He knew damn well it will end bad for him, but didn't care.
this, that's why they gave him the new girlfriend, to show us right up front that he was willing to knowingly give up the good things he had in his life already just to find that closure.
and then the remake did what they decided to do with that element.
Disturbing maybe not, but it shows the curiosity of man and how psychotic even the most normal-looking man can be. It's quite realistic.
Just ready the wikipedia summary. 5/10 movie. Dumb ending.
Fucking this. I watched Spoorloos first time when I was still in high school and didn't have problem with understanding it. How the fuck can people not get it? Are they all Americans or something?
yes
The book is standard Dutch reading material for high schoolers
Not-knowing drives people mad, it really does. This film makes me empathise with patents whose kids are missing, even the ones that are obviously dead due to drugs or niggering. The parents need that closure of having the body.
i remember really feeling like shit for a couple of days after reading it
meanwhile everybody else in class was like "man what a dumb book"
iirc the remake is actually about his second girlfriend who gets another boyfriend. then she disappears and the new boyfriend follows her steps exatcly like MC in the original did.
No. Sandra Bullock is the second girlfriend who saves MC at the end.
I forgot about that. Actually never read it, went with other books then, maybe I should.