Why didn't Camilla ever tell Charles to fuck off? Was she the real golddigger all along?

Why didn't Camilla ever tell Charles to fuck off? Was she the real golddigger all along?

Attached: Camilla.jpg (4500x3000, 1.59M)

>Was she the real golddigger all along?
Unironically yes. If she put her foot down Charles would've been able to love Diana. As always, it's the woman's fault, it's just that in this situation most people blame the wrong woman.

How could she tell him to fuck off when she was just as much in love with him as he was with her?

A better woman would have respected his marriage and tell him to get lost. But this is Camilla, golddigger homewrecker wench extraordinaire

When women go renegade it's the fault of the men in their life. Andrew Parker Bowles is to blame.

If she actually loved him she would've put his interests over his own and let him be happy with with his wife and kids. Instead she did nothing but indulge him and debase his marriage and status. She wanted him a s a fucktoy for the ego boost. She never loved him

>his own
*her

This show went full out anti-Charles. He sounded like a Bond villain in the last two episodes. Making him a hunchback also did little to generate sympathy

The show is so political motivated it's sad.
I wanted to see the attempted kidnapping of Princess Anne and the shots fired at Trooping the colour. The Scots Guardsman who attempted to bayonet the guy was sent a bottle of whiskey every year.

>most people blame the wrong woman
Why would people blame Diana? What did she do wrong?

>What did she do wrong?
Be a whining, mental, cunt.

It’s weird because s3 was so pro-Chuck

Also princess Anne a hot

In the show? Yes

In real life? No, she's just an uglier version of her mother

Attached: PrincessAnne.jpg (615x409, 44.57K)

I'm sure they'll go anti-Diana next season. The producers just do whatever is most interesting and dramatic

Not once did they ever make Diana look bad. Their making her a saint. It's in their interest to do so. No one wants to see their brave and perfect heroine for who she truly was: a human being

Yeah they made her absolutely flawless. Looking forward to her death though. Hope they have the balls to show Charles gunning down her car

They made her flawlessly bulimic, and emotionally unhinged.

Yeah but they were like
>Her bulimia is Charles' fault for being a bad husband, when things were good she wasn't bulimic!!!
Also how was she presented as emotionally unhinged?

How is it possible that people don't realize that following these people's lives and worshipping them like gods is stupid as fuck. They are just people. Not only do they get to be elite billionaire royalty, but they also get to be worshipped by the plebs? Fuck off.

Incorrect, they showed numerous times how she doesn't know Charles YEARS into their relationship, showing she's more self centered than she thinks.

Really? It seemed to me like they were blaming Charles for never opening up to her. They always showed their relationship a being at arms length. Guess they were showing how neither of them put in any effort. The only thing she did that made me go like "what a bitch" was when she danced on stage during Charles' birthday. And when she gave a recording of her shitty opera to him for their anniversary. But Charles was shown as passive and never actually trying to put in effort

>bongs call this a princess
LOL

>They are just people
People chosen by god.
Also, I bet you'd shit yourself if someone shot your protection officer and tried to kidnap you, not come up with one liner's like Princess Anne did.

>The only thing she did that made me go like "what a bitch" was when she danced on stage during Charles' birthday. And when she gave a recording of her shitty opera to him for their anniversary.

That's the two main examples. You would think a wife would know whether her husband would like such an overtly public display

>Spaniards call this a princess

Attached: PrincesaLeonor.jpg (1280x720, 67.35K)

Yeah that's true. Even if you barely talked to Charles you could probably gather that he despises stuff like that. Yeah I guess they showed Diana as being addicted to the spotlight at the expense of her husband

>Was she the real golddigger all along?
Diana later went to a spoiled Arab billionaire who inherited his wealth. She was a golddigger through and through

Was killing Diana really necessary?

Attached: PrincessD.jpg (1600x900, 266.12K)

They are just people. We are all chosen by god. They just happened to be them and you just happened to be you. No need to worship the fucks.

What was the last thing the go through Diana's mind?
The seat in front of her

>We are all chosen by god.
Nope. Cope and seethe more.
>Worship
Literally no-one worships them.

I don't worship them, but I do respect them and I'm glad they exist

Imagine having this be the last thing you see before you die

Attached: PrinceCharlesBazooka.jpg (1024x699, 211.41K)

But that's a Carl Gustav not a bazooka.

As long as it does the job

They showed infidelity on her part and irrational behavior. I think it was pretty fair.

They made it look like Charles forced her into infidelity by purposefully ignoring her. Remember, silence is violence

>It's another thread about why isn't muh obvious historical fiction soap opera seem as if it's not 100% historically accurate
Do you people go up to Roman historians and inquire about Maximus' tactics during his campaign against Emperor Joaquin?

They made everything Charles' fault.
>Bulimia?
Charles' abused her and made her bulimic.
>Didn't know her husband?
Charles never opened up to her.
>Cheated on her husband with dozens of men?
Charles' fault for ignoring her.