When did you realize Goblet of Fire was the best Harry Potter movie?

When did you realize Goblet of Fire was the best Harry Potter movie?

Attached: 130631967.jpg (2501x1563, 646.76K)

Any day now.

Just rewatched it. The opening still feels incredibly rushed. Nothing has time to linger at all, but it becomes true kino from the moment Moody has his first lesson. That's when things slow down and the movie has time to breath. Not sure if it's the best, but far better than I remembered.
Oh, and it's a bit weird how cedric doesn't have any lines until 45 minutes into the movie.

Its not the best but its the most fun to shitpost about

Prisoner is the undisputed best of the series, just stop fighting it.

KRUM!! KRUM!! KRUM!! KRUM!! KRUM!!

WHUT'S THAT BOY?

Attached: whutsthatboy.jpg (1020x423, 88.03K)

He's like a BURD

The Chinese Virus, oooooooooooh

NNNNNYYEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRR

Attached: 1597593227438.jpg (1904x814, 54.02K)

Prisoner is the one most flagrantly disrespectful towards the source material. It doesn't feel like cuaron had read the book as much as a sparknotes version of it.
It's good, might be the most technically well made movie of them, but that doesn't mean it's the best Harry Potter movie.

>Junior
>He said calmly
>THE CHINESE FIREBALL, OOOOH
>SILEEEEEEEENCE *TAP TAP TAP*
Am I missing any?

I miss the old Dumble, the calm Dumble, the "however" Dumble.
I hate the new Dumble, the bad mood Dumble, the always loud Dumble.

It's the dumbest. So yes, in a way. Everyone acts like they're on crack, no barbers exist anymore and it completely butchers the book story. But it's a trip.

Attached: Mr. Tennant's Wild Ride.png (513x412, 198.42K)

Why didn’t the adults just not allow Harry to compete? Would the goblet of fire explode like a nuke if he didn’t? Why did Dumbledore run up to him all flustered and shouting “DID YOU LUT YOUR NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIRE?!” Instead of just being like “Well, clearly that was a goof. Fourth years can’t compete that’s in the rules”

Azkaban was peak. Goblet of Fire was the start of the decline. Deathly Hallows pt. 1 was the best of the later films.

why are you acting like Cuaron wrote the script?

The books are shit, being as far from that as possible is a plus in a my book

>ELLO FARTHA
>WHAT'S THAT, BOY
And:

ALBOOOOS

Attached: The Slav Fireballs, ooooooooh.webm (920x384, 2.97M)

>HERE COME THE BULGARIANS
>KRUM KRUM KRUM
>YOU HAVE NO BIZNEZZ HERE...THIS TENT IS FOR CHAMPIONS........AND FRIENDS
>WHATSTHATBOY?
>I CAN TOUCH YOU NOW...NEEEERRRRRGGHHHHAAAAA!

They're retards. They say it's a "magically binding contract" so presumably there's a penalty clause but I see no reason why they couldn't have changed the tournament to a game of rock paper scissors between the four of them, then carried on with the other 3 as champions for the proper tasks.

BAD DREAM

Attached: 1511815328925.png (625x400, 592.88K)

Goblet of Fire should've been two movies fact. Also Order of the Phoenix

It's also the comfiest HP movie. The David Yates directed movies are a depressing slog with that shit filter that makes everything look like diarrhea. They're devoid of any life or magic both in the story and visuals.

Attached: 1363167031976.jpg (656x656, 64.01K)

It's the best book but the movie sucked.

OOTP just needed to be longer. For some reason it's the shortest HP movie even though it's the longest book. Needed to be about 40-45 minutes longer, it's super rushed. Early cuts were around 3 hours. GOF I think needed two, it has a more intricate plot than OOTP which suffered from getting compressed.

Durmstrang and the Legend Awakened

Attached: Proud son of Durrrmstrang.webm (868x704, 1.32M)

I swear they were passing cocaine around on set filming Goblet. Everyone acts like a maniac.

>Dumbledore catches the paper from the goblet of fire
>"ok who wrote Updog on his paper?"

when it showed the only sentimentality in the entire show, somehow harry had bonded with pattison. it is a bit odd that he felt closer to him than anyone else. rivals who could have been friends.