So if I put a 10 dollar chip on green and 10 on either red or black or odd or even, is that better than not doing so?

So if I put a 10 dollar chip on green and 10 on either red or black or odd or even, is that better than not doing so?

If I bet on Red and green:
>lands on red, break even
>lands on black, lose
>lands on green, 35 to 1

Attached: roulette-table-rental-600x600.jpg (600x600, 100.8K)

Never get beaten by green. Always throw a little bit on it just in case. Most of your bet should be in the 2/1s.

No. And you cannot beat roulette. Even Euro single zero roulette.

You basically break even or lose money every spin until it hits green

i beat roulette
first game i mastered
now i never play because it is boring
and being addicted to the low of losing is far superior to the thrill of win

yeah but green may never come

Yes, well done you've solved a mathematical problem that's hauled in billions for casinos over decades..have a (you)

Retard

>Play game against casino
>Think I am smarter than the other 10,000 people who think they're smarter than the casino
>It turns out I'm right
>Start winning against casino
>Casino: You have to leave. We're not playing against you.

Attached: least rare pepe.png (421x291, 115.72K)

kek I actually thought I had a "system" once for playing craps. Being the non-retard I was, I simulated it with an Excel spreadsheet before trying it in real life. Turns out, I didn't have a system.

The only "win" at roulette is at the automated tables. You can sit at those things for hours betting next to nothing and take the free drinks.

that is the best litmus test. Anyone who comes to you with a system. ask them run a simulation.
if they arent smart enough to do that then chances are they arent smart enough to come up with a system. They never see it that way though.

Britfag croup here, can only talk about single 0 with partage.

Even chance outside bets have a 1.35% house edge, straight ups(Single numbers) have a 2.7% house edge.

With your bet, you would expect a winning number to come up 51.35% of the time, with the rest being ruin. However, you only have a 2.7% chance of hitting a profitable number, 0.
If you just bet red you have a lower chance of a winning number coming in, at 48.65%, but every hit is a win, with a house edge of only 1.35%

Statistically, long term even chance bets will lose you money slower, you wont get a big payday from hitting zero but you also aren't losing as much on the misses.

There is no mathematical system that can give you an edge over the house, the only ways you can beat roulette is by either cheating or taking advantage of newish dealers who cant vary a spin or professional dealers who are more focused on staying away from a big players section.

>professional dealers who are more focused on staying away from a big players section.
interesting so crupiers are afraid of playing with whales because of their winings which are the casino losses

No, most croupiers love dealing to whales, better tips and the interesting action you get is part of the fun of the job.

By "big players section" I mean if there is a player betting big on a particular section of the wheel, such as voisons (a french bet that covers the numbers around zero)

Everyone thinks that the dealer can spin the ball to land in a specific number if they just tried hard enough, which is next to impossible. A very experienced dealer can "aim" for sections and land in that section more than pure chance. So generally on a game with a big player who is winning, you will see the pit rotate the dealers more frequently, trying to get a dealer in that can somewhat control the ball. You will never hear this talked about openly, we do not even talk to each other about it much but are aware of it, that's why on some big games you will have someone watching solely the dealers wheel to ensure they are varying their spin.
Normal dealers through either boredom of lack of attention can sometimes get stuck because they forget to vary their spin or are distracted by something/someone. This can lead them to making the same motion of the wheel and speed of the ball so that either an identifiable pattern emerges or they just get stuck around the same numbers.

There is always still that element of chance but the dealer is the weakest link to exploit in roulette, hence why the cameras and inspectors aren't watching the customers, we're watching the dealer.

Roulette can be beaten, u need a body-worn computer and a laser ball tracker and software that can track the speed of the ball and calcuate the number it will land on. It will give you a mathematical advantage but you will be quickly spotted and kicked out and banned plus maybe beat the fuck up by security

>started playing roulette for the first time on a cruise ship
>they had a big screen keeping track of past rolls
>realized a trick to playing
>wouldn't play very turn
>eventually I'd have all of my color of chips available
>made the mistake of playing nonstop and continuing to bet during statistical anomalies
>lost

I'm going to write a program based on what I used and see if I can win at an online casino.

They don't allow bets a few moments after the ball is spun.

>body-worn computer
Bruh a smart phone could do that
>laser ball tracker
These days you could probably stick a tiny camera in your glasses to track the ball with a trained AI to identify and track it from varying angles so you dont look suss standing right next to the wheel.
>calcuate the number it will land on
Still super hard, due to the deflectors and the bounce of the ball(ivorine or teflon) but possible to get sections "most" of the time.
>you will be quickly spotted
Yes, if you are consistently late betting AND hitting big numbers, you'll start getting no betted and probably checked out.
>maybe beat the fuck up by security
Depends but yeah in less civilised countries or those tacky obviously mob casinos will probably rough you up.

Is there a way to martingale at roulette? Like half the reds, half the evens, half the blacks, half the odds, and just staying in with huge bets?

you mean martingale down to zero?

I'm toying with the idea of doing a martingale but I stop playing after 3 consecutive losses.

Or up to 100k in a few spins. Every spin should be 2x money or bust with as close to a 50/50 as a casino will let you get.

>statistical anomalies

They are exactly that, sure it's hit red 7 times in a row so statistically it "should" revert to the mean, but I've seen 27 consecutive black numbers before, if you chase that you will ruin yourself before it even goes back to red/0.
See Gambler's fallacy.
>They don't allow bets a few moments after the ball is spun.
Depending on the casino's policy, ours is minimum 4 spins before the ball drops, but if we suspect someone is tracking the ball we will spin and call no more straight away.

>Is there a way to martingale at roulette?

Bruh martingale was made for roulette, and again like all mathematical systems will not win in the long run.

The best you can ask for are the systems that lower your loses in the long run, but you will always lose.

Only way to truly win is win once, cash out and never EVER step foot in a casino again. The longer you stay at the table, the more it works in the house favour.

That is what killed me. I would see "oh, it's black 4 times in a row, better keep betting on red!" so similarly with columns/rows.

My update to the method is if something hits 3-4 times in a row or 0s hit a few times in a row, let it ride, don't play.

>Only way to truly win is win once, cash out and never EVER step foot in a casino again
I've never actually been to one, but if I ever ended up there by chance, I'd like to take the proper swing for the fence.

Honestly the best advice I can give you is do not play roulette to win money. As a croup, degenerate casino gambler myself and an awful crypto gambler, please, DO NOT PLAY ROULETTE TO WIN MONEY.

The 2nd best advice I can give you if you do want to try winning money in roulette is to identify weak/distracted dealers and take advantage of that. The math is in the casino's favour, you cannot change the math without cheating or removing some of the random chance.

cool info dood

It's been my experience that progressive betting on a single number is the best chance,
The caveat is you need to already have a decent sum of money to make sure you can cover on the whole ride up.
And depending on house rules, it may not even be playable.

It has the most favorable odds out of anything in the casino towards the player. If you simply do not play every turn and know when not to play and when to, I think you can hedge your odds a bit stronger. Probability plays a large factor in terms of likely/unlikely.

Thanks man :)

>It has the most favorable odds out of anything in the casino towards the player.

Please
PLEASE
PLEEEEEASE
Provide me with your stats
I've been working in casino's for 5 years, i've seen hundreds of systems and thousands of people ruin their lives over "systems that work for the player"

I'm a bit afraid to say it because if I do, casinos might start taking down their roulette screens.

>t. man with delusional fantasies

Okay lemme fill you in on another secret.

We actually keep those boards up and provide cards and pens for people to track numbers for one reason only.

It encourages people to make terrible choices by seeing "patterns" that aren't really there.

The only pattern you can identify that will benefit you is finding a weak dealer.

Well I sat at the cruise's casino playing roulette all day with my then-gf and I did very well. I recall getting all the chips they had for my color at various points. I just needed to iron out my strat + add in a playtime limiter.

lel I did get a pen and paper at one point because the board started to skip recording numbers and when I did that, magically all the numbers started recording every spin.

what does that mean to find a weak dealer?