>Past earnings reports (alphabetical) ASC: EST EPS $0.14, actual $0.20. DHT: EST EPS $0.54, actual is $0.44 (divvy of $0.35). EURN: EST EPS $0.86, actual $1.05 (divvy of $1.10). INSW: EST EPS $1.45, actual $1.49. NNA: EST EPS $0.00, actual $0.94. OSG: EST EPS N/A (Q4, 2019 was $0.12)., actual $0.28. STNG: EST EPS $0.49, actual $0.82.
> Upcoming earnings reports calendar NAT on 5/18, not specified SFL on 5/19, pre-market TNK on 5/21, pre-market FRO on 5/29, pre-market TNP on 6/4, pre-market
>Another important date May 19th, 2020 (you know why)
tankiethreads are really comfy, I suspect they'll get retarded when stock rallies a bit.
Also tankerbros are really respected in all of Zig Forums.
Robert Turner
FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS
Ethan Ramirez
He's an idiot. It's not a bad idea to have both a bullish *and* bearish thesis for how this will play out though. We anons can profit either way.
Jack Mitchell
Let him walk the plank captain. Brandon belongs in Davy Jones locker
Alexander Bell
>Short answer is no their only evidence for storage hitting causing immediate violent cuts is a neural network. If you know how neural networks work then you know that it can't predict something like this at least not with useful inputs to draw patterns from to map onto this scenario. None such inputs exist, therefore it guess is as good as yours or mine. You would have similar possibly better luck asking some econ nerds to geek out over this as a thought experiment as you would using a neural network built to predict the generalized oil markets ebbs and flows in production vs demand. Their total confidence in this is unwarranted considering what they have to prove their proposition. But then these are business guys, they probably have no fucking clue how neural networks work so just assumed well the computer has something here right? To be fair neural networks can notice patterns humans won't and even can't notice but given the nature of this event being outside the scope of this network its too out of its data set to predict accurately without a) extra assumptions added for this specific scenario(in which case prediction is as good as the assumptions) b) data of relevance and use being added(none exists) for the system to draw patterns from and to check its hypothesis against.
Landon Hughes
>Also tankerbros are really respected in all of Zig Forums.
