Say it with me corecucks — Default Summary Judgement

Going on the fucking offensive at last.

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.490.0.pdf

Attached: 1581612456046.jpg (900x540, 43.95K)

for craig to lose he will have proved he was in a partnership with dave kleiman that mined 10mm bitcoins, how retarded are you?

not really he will pretty much lose by default

>To this day, Dr. Wright has not complied with the Court’s orders compelling discovery on May 14 and June 14.
>Rather, as described above, the evidence establishes that he has engaged in a willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior, including submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings, filing a false declaration, knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document, and giving perjurious testimony at the evidentiary hearing.
>Dr. Wright’s conduct has prevented Plaintiffs from obtaining evidence that the Court found relevant to Plaintiffs’ claim that Dr. Wright and David Kleiman formed a partnership to develop Bitcoin technology and to mine bitcoin.
>Plaintiffs have also been prejudiced by not being able to try to trace the bitcoin that was mined.
>His conduct has wasted substantial amounts of the Court’s and the Plaintiffs’ time and resources. It has unnecessarily protracted this litigation.

>I have found that Dr. Wright intentionally submitted fraudulent documents to the Court, obstructed a judicial proceeding, and gave perjurious testimony.

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.277.0.pdf

>willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior
>submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings
>filing a false declaration
>knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document
>giving perjurious testimony

if anyone thinks the judge improved his opinion on craig since that order or his odds are better now gonna be in for a surprise.

LOL
you're a lying fag

Read the latest pdfs moron. Ira's entire claim (bar one ground) is time barred. Even if they were not, he comes nowhere near to evidencing any of his allegations. The burden of proof is a high one and is not met.
Satoshi has applied to prevent the judge's negative findings put before the jury.

Ira may well lose this by default. A lot of this turns on a technical point- was notice of the Australian proceedings served by the state's Central Authority.

Attached: 1585394831065.jpg (910x503, 162.75K)

indeed asset is a strong word i would use tool

doesn't matter man, craig will lose it at thsi point even if ira doesn't get what he wants. and probably will not get anything anyhow the lawyers gonna be fat tho.

You can't sit on a claim for fucking years then expect the court to require the other side to prove your allegations.

Attached: 1559599509906.jpg (800x773, 90.84K)

How is he so based?

Attached: 1573868794193.jpg (541x540, 66.92K)

the case is about Ira kleiman saying craig wright owes him half a million bitcoins he alleges were mined in a partnership between wright and dave kleiman.
from your point of view it is impossible for craig to lose this case as you think there is no way craig mined 1,000,000 bitcoins that early

you can't submit forged documents wither without being held in contempt being slapped with the legal expenses and some penalties.

none of that matter becasue nobody can prove those coins exist.
what matter is will craig pay for iras lawyers and will he see jail or not.

>Ira's claim in danger of being struck out entirely.
>Wright reserving his right to seek relief for this wasteful, costly exercise.
You're in for a bad time.

Attached: 1585502019359.jpg (3024x4032, 1.41M)

craig never mined anything btw he is a gox baby
he bought all his bitcoins on gox then defrauded the ato and tried to pull the same shit on the kleimans

we will see but i would give it 805 that craig gets slammed with all expenses and some extra for wasting court time.

80% damn

>none of that matter
the entire court case is about that. If kleiman can't prove those coins are owned by a partnership between dave and craig then craig wins.
Are you fucking retarded?
if that is true then craig wins

>the entire court case is about that.
never said it was not all bullshit. but man you see this all wrong. this court case is a publicity stunt i wouldn't even be surprised if both sides were in calvins employment.

>if that is true then craig wins
no he will lose, because nobody can prove shit and both side claims the same retarded bullshit which the judge can't verify or even have duty to investigate.

It's becoming clearer and clearer that you don't have a clue.

Attached: 1585404151332.png (640x1066, 540.56K)

you are sub 80 iq.
If you accuse someone of something and you can not prove it you pay not the person you accuse

like i said we will see
ahahahah you mad as fuck sorry brainlet you don't understand what this case is about truly. if you think it's about the satoshi coins i can't help you.