Genuinely curious as to what happens to those who don't make the cut when employers only hire based on min-maxing intelligence (IQ), personality and attractiveness. I've been autistically trying to do the math on this question using genetic and evolutionary optimization algorithms and I honestly can't find an equilibrium point for the number of college graduates vs number of jobs available. Basically according to my model, 92.1% of college grads SHOULD be unemployed NEETs, but they're clearly not in reality.
So question is, where the hell do all the losers in life end up in? And don't say
>mcdonalds or walmart or call center
they too min-max for the "optimal" wagie personality during the hiring process
How do you even get a job if you're not in the top 1% of applicants?
In a world with government fiat, there’s very little optimization going on.
>letting thots invest for you
Connections.
In case you haven't figured it out by now, if you want ANY job that requires an online application you MUST put keywords in your app so the AI screener can filter you into the positive pile.
And it obviously depends on the position you are looking for...
Janitor? Maintenance? Positive keywords: GED, Army, 'Grew up in'
Banking? Executive? Positive keywords: -berg, -stein, Member of LGBT-, Diversity Coordinator, etc.
Learn to game their system
E
Linkedin is a farce. Look at these people with 500+ connections. Look at all their profile pics.
This approach only gets you passed the bot filters. But an HR rep would easily spot the manipulation or even during an interview when you get caught out for lying
wtf you can go on leave for gardening. life is so easy for women
Gardening leave means she probably signed a 12 - 24 month non-compete in her former job
LinkedIn is not real connections, he means to actually know people and have a good relationship with them