Can anyone who understands this shit break this down to me? I dont understand nerd talk but i want to understand what i dumped $60000 in. Thanks
Can anyone who understands this shit break this down to me...
Blake Perez
Brayden Murphy
it's literally nothing. your shitcoin is about to tank
Asher Roberts
this is all you need to understand. Below does exactly what they have spent 6 months working on
math.random()
Jaxson Brooks
basically sergey is the demiurge
Anthony Howard
Oh ok cool, so nobody else here gets it
Blake Moore
In programming it's standard to have a call to a random function built in. Any time you need to use a random number, languages provide this capability to you.
ChainLink is now providing this capability to smart contract developers.
Landon Bennett
>asks to be spoonfed something completely straightforward
>throws an instant hissy fit as soon as he doesn't get a full reply
how about you just fuck off you brat
Evan Flores
you can just see sergey scanning modules of code trying to find something he can construe as novel and wrap it up in buzzwords and powerpoint slides to keep his hapless baghholders satiated for another month
>ah...erm...VRF!
Adam Gomez
This. It's going sub $2
Logan Allen
im not a virgin
Levi Johnson
basically the ability to create truly random numbers/data in the blockchain creates a superstrong cryptographic use, plus the uses for gaming,lotterys,etc
Camden Turner
posted in another thread, maybe this will make it more easy to see
Nolan Edwards
you heard it hear first folks, the real use for chainlink is a niggernet for internet gambling. you cant make this stuff up
Isaac Walker
so Sergie and team stole this concept and implemented as their own? idgi
Benjamin Thomas
bait
Josiah Foster
Yes yes seethe seethe , your fud is as weak as are your hands
Aiden Hernandez
Programming random number generators sounds extremely simple on a superficial level. Even the most basic C++ classes have students program games with "random number generators". However this is deceptive, because the nature of the random number generation has underpinnings in the logic gates/transistors that allow for the program to run. The upshot of this is that random number generators that "take 5 minutes to put together in Javascript" the FUD anons are describing can be exploited easily and represent an attack surface which could undermine several use cases in blockchain that require them, gaming being one obvious among these. By being able to cryptographically "prove" that a number generated is truly random, that further provides both defense in depth and trustless execution of a smart contract that relies on random numbers such as online gaming.
Thomas Jackson
>clinical trials
>financial audits
>legal metrology
imagine being so deluded you think these institutions will be purchasing LINK tokens. the absolute state of your bags
Dominic Reyes
Hrs just repeating what you said. How is that fud you imbecile?
Justin Morales
Thank you, this makes sense now. Basically im going to be fucking rich
Jeremiah Evans
Yes. This is a big fucking deal and we are all going to be rich as fuck.
engineering.mit.edu
Colton Russell
This is the correct answer. Anons, think about situations where a random selection must occur in an exchange with multiple parties. Now think about how difficult it is to prove that whatever generated the number wasn’t tampered with. How do you know a number is in fact random? Chainlink solves that. Well, apparently, I haven’t read the blog post or the details yet.
Jayden Wilson
This sounds like it was written like Sergey
Isaac Morales
> “One day [‘World of Warcraft’ game maker] Blizzard removed the damage component from my beloved warlock's Siphon Life spell. I cried myself to sleep, and on that day I realized what horrors centralized services can bring. I soon decided to quit,” Buterin wrote.
WAAAAAA REEEEEEE MUH SPELL REEEEEEEEE
Leo Reyes
Honestly if you can sell chihuahuas door-to-door then you can sell adult diapers on eBay. Just stay positive and keep your chins up.
Andrew Bennett
boards.4channel.org
Jesus did you even try to read other threads that have already explained it in detail
Luis Barnes
>This is the correct answer.
Lincoln Allen
No its more for OTP generation. The team just created a whole new monetization stream for nodes without even needing API data it would appear.
William Brooks
is this the new pee pee poo poo?
Jace Morales
I think you’re confusing non-pseudo random number generation with secure pseudo-random number generation
Luke Murphy
lmao, this nigga is still going to generate pseudo random numbers
they'll just be "verifiable on the blockchain"
tick tock linkies