>Yes goy bitcoin is 100% decentralized, we are fighting against evil mean banks! Just do all your transactions off-chain with our centralized company blockstream so we get the fees :D
Yes goy bitcoin is 100% decentralized...
Craig will either shoot himself or choke on vomit before year's end. Screencap this.
is bcash that desperate?
yeah because craig revealed the fatal flaw in segwit in 2018 and bchsv went to $1200 by 2019 eoy, then he received his bitcoins in 2020 january
from the bondage courier and he dumped all his btc stack during the halving crashing btc price to double digits...
btc is so fucked.
This is Adam Back's lover?
>the anti-bitcoin shills are back again
try to spend a segwit balance with a random hash and no signature! you should be able to do it if you are not full of shit. what's stopping you?
here is a nice fat segwit address... 386eAUqL3ZNZPmHeABXLo658DTQuJeLzUR go on spend it!
That's a nice Lightning Network token you've got there. Be a shame if, something happened to it!
a miner can
go ahead!
really? then how would that transaction that other miners and nodes accept look like?
see the right of this image
yes
sorry that's just a bunch of rectangles.. let's talk like grownups!
here two sample transactions, show me a third valid transaction that a miner could use to spend the coins! then you explain why you personally couldn't do it if a miner can!
386eAUqL3ZNZPmHeABXLo658DTQuJeLzUR
blockchain.com
Pkscript
OP_HASH160464892ddc206704ac2123c14ff93cc49b1f3c360OP_EQUAL
Sigscript
0014e318f5a928b78d335f8aa9088d7f83525c36d9b6
Witness
304502210095277d14d2c952a5a6ca3efb07f036af03fedf869d30635c99f5d599052f5e9402207e5d599b16cb4e912771b1349de1cc2cb88d44e2f6002206e73841fe9a0e1b4501
022030ce0d01f5d4da661a0ac56b898dfe14feb7cda1047da0cb2cc60000ce049f
blockchain.com
Pkscript
OP_HASH160464892ddc206704ac2123c14ff93cc49b1f3c360OP_EQUAL
Sigscript
0014e318f5a928b78d335f8aa9088d7f83525c36d9b6
Witness
3044022008d481ede2eb0fcd91a8843247816d386def4b77660fc225001efca9ae71ef9b022078e27ab07fc9e40d6d24dd1cc1f77412b0a945eac296b6e36d8f9812b76bfe7601
022030ce0d01f5d4da661a0ac56b898dfe14feb7cda1047da0cb2cc60000ce049f
You're actually an idiot if you believe this graphic (this is assuming you're not trolling)
Go spend bitcoin to and from a segwit address. Or don't, idc--you can keep gambling on shitcoins for all I care
Bitcoin works and it doesn't care what Ver or CSW told you
BTC doesn't work though and it's losing adoption in the real world. It's the epitome of "gambling on shitcoins"
yeah funny thing is the most loud mouthed retards shrilling about segwit understand it the least. they have no clue about how bitcoin works.
I can't do it because I can't mine blocks.
the miner puts a transaction in a block that would look exactly like one of those transactions but the hash is of a signature not derived from the private key of the coins he is moving.
valid for segwit but not bitcoin
-billionaire hedge funds longing bitcoin
-jp morgan opens accounts for bitcoin exchanges
-3rd halving went off without a hitch
-$billions in daily trading volume
-300k+ txs a day
Looks like it works to me. Idk man, stay poor buying shitcoins I guess
Yeah, they remind me of nocoiners (particularly the journo class) in that they almost revel in their ignorance. IT's like a point of pride to understand bitcoin as little as possible
what is wrong in that graphic?
bitcoin works but segwit is not bitcoin
>billionaire hedge funds longing bitcoin
Once again. No real world use and just people gambling on a shitcoin. BTW, they aren't buying bitcoin, they're just buying a futures contract.
i'm confused, where do you put this random binary string exactly? show me the example! where is that hash of a signature you think is located? and stop with the rectangles already! nobody can spend rectangles. show me the content of the transaction! you can use placeholders like this:
P2WPKH nested in BIP16 P2SH
witness:
scriptSig:
(0x160014{20-byte-key-hash})
scriptPubKey: HASH160 EQUAL
(0xA914{20-byte-script-hash}87)
well two wrongs that are obvious: the "hash" that goes into the old sigscript field is not the hash of a "signature" but the sigscript without the signature, this becomes apparent if you look at the two transactions because they are almost identical the only difference is the signature in the first part of the witness, the end is the pubkey and script.
so without knowing the private key to that pubkey how do you propose to construct a signature for the transaction?
>he thinks it's about money
Don't be naive
t.seething glownigger
the witness is a hash of a signature not a signature
>so without knowing the private key to that pubkey how do you propose to construct a signature for the transaction?
hash an arbitrary signature and accept the transaction into a block
oh no... he is retarded
>example
Pkscript
OP_HASH160464892ddc206704ac2123c14ff93cc49b1f3c360OP_EQUAL
Sigscript
0014e318f5a928b78d335f8aa9088d7f83525c36d9b6
Witness
eb0fcd91a8843247816d386def4b77660fc2253044022008d481ede2001efca9ae71ef9b022078e27ab07fc9e40d6d24dd1cc1f77412b0a945eac296b6e36d8f9812b76bfe7601
022030ce0d01f5d4da661a0ac56b898dfe14feb7cda1047da0cb2cc60000ce049f
why
Their arguments are so stupid that they force people to look and turn them pro btc.
which hash function in bitcoin codebase results in a 71 byte hash?
rejected. your signature is not in the correct format to begin with but does not match your pubkey.
Can't wait for it to crash again and watch all you faggots commit suicide.
Bitcoin is trash and so are you for believing in it.
Fake internet money is crap.