FUCK YOU BTC HOLDERS

Attached: gfh5t.png (1649x1498, 303.88K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XfcvX0P1b5g
cs.princeton.edu/~arvindn/publications/mining_CCS.pdf
bis.org/publ/work765.pdf
twitter.com/adam3us/status/1259980906267324416
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's crazy how all this coin news comes out.
Like, all the time. Constantly.

Kek the mods there are such insecure faggots

Omg thats amazing!

Update: Omg i didnt think someone will actually literally read my post!
Update2: OMG Thank you so much for gold kind stranger !

They are literally craig wright tier at this point declaring that adam back is Satoshi. Complete fucking losers

youtube.com/watch?v=XfcvX0P1b5g
adam back literally is satoshi tho

They also ban you for the slightest disagreement

nope Adam Beck is a loser

No, he's not. You saying that is exactly why blockstream is coingeek tier now. Satoshi was posting from somewhere in California. Although he used the UK spellchecker, he also used American slang that is not used in the UK.

hi blockstream

i thought this adam back thing was a joke to rile up the cregies? is this a serious narrative now?

What? My point is that blockstream is literally on par with the losers at coingeek now

>On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block Reward
cs.princeton.edu/~arvindn/publications/mining_CCS.pdf
Princeton university

>Beyond the doomsday
economics of “proof-of work” in cryptocurrencies
BIS, Monetary and Economic Department

bis.org/publ/work765.pdf

"Second, the transaction market cannot generate an adequate level of
“mining” income via fees as users free-ride on the fees of other transactions in a block and in the
subsequent blockchain. Instead, newly minted bitcoins, known as block rewards, have made up the bulk
of mining income to date. Looking ahead, these two limitations imply that liquidity is set to fall dramatically
as these block rewards are phased out. Simple calculations suggest that once block rewards are zero, it
could take months before a Bitcoin payment is final, unless new technologies are deployed to speed up
payment finality. Second-layer solutions such as the Lightning Network might help, but the only
fundamental remedy would be to depart from proof-of-work, which would probably require some form
of social coordination or institutionalisation."

>Written by phd´s in computer science and economics. Bitcoiners can’t refute this fud, lol. These academic papers prove that proof of work will not work longterm.
Another weakness is the lack of on chain governance, which results in huge governance and coordination problems, and limits innovation.

Attached: dgf564tyr.jpg (1760x1262, 121.47K)

Did you not notice how heavily shilled it was and how it was perfectly timed to come out at the halving?

That community is getting out of touch with crypto with every passing minute.

Attached: rbitcoin.jpg (724x417, 41.21K)

umm no sweety
amerifats don't use bloody as an intensifier
it's most common amongst aussies and second in england

Attached: Satoshi1.png (1316x699, 473.66K)

Wrong

>Two people connected to bitcoin who double space
>One under oath can't prove he's Satoshi
leaves one

it was hilarious but i still think it was an anti-blockstream propaganda that backfired because the community played along.
it's all just trolls trolling each other.

the guy who made it has literally nothing to do with crypto, and has been doing the series for like 3 months. it has nothing to do with the halving

>proof of cussing
>proof of word documents
>proof of shitposting
oh boy this is not gonna be easy for you

this. craig wasn't even a proper cypherpunk hes pro as fuck government and if you think bitcoin wasn't a cypherpunk creation you are retarded.

that's the point halving just amplifies interest and makes maxis exuberant.

Haha. Maxi's so mad. Just wait until ARPA hits 200x'ing from bottom.

>bis.org/publ/work765.pdf
didnt read. not selling.

i think plenty dystopians were in the cypherpunks it was not a unified rank of libertarians....
when will you people get that these "soft proofs" are literally worthless and meaningless? the timezones satoshi worked are the closest thing to actual scientific metric but as far as i know they are inconclusive also people are free to move.

>cypherpunk
this reminds me

Attached: tale-of-two-satoshis.png (1368x398, 431.63K)

load of pseudo-science bollocks and speculation why not wait a hundred years and see what happens?

Fucking bagholders. My excitement will exceed every imagination when I will see you buying ETH at 0.1 BTC.

Within five to six years, Bitcoin will only have to support itself with fees. It'll be a pleasure to fuck you user with the rest of the market.

twitter.com/adam3us/status/1259980906267324416
TL;DR yes, I'm satoshi, here's the reasons why, but NDA doesn't allow me to say yes

imagine all the mental gymnastics going through your rent free brains after seeing all the evidence in the 5 billion dollar court case

>adam pleb could contest craig copywrighting the whitepaper and code
>he hasn't
yikes

Attached: EOq0FUzW4AEkq97.jpg (1614x1014, 262.94K)

>he hasn't
because it's better for satoshi to remain unnamed, he literally says as much in an interview

Isn't this what Reddcoin was supposed to do? Remember that?

Wrong. Satoshi was posting from somewhere within California.

technically this is not true.
i mean what if the block reward keeps halving but the price keeps 10x-ing like before? until the block reward is completely gone bitcoin can theoretically increase in value to pick up the slack and not have to rely on fees.

but yeah i also think after the next halving subsidy and fees will be 50-50 of reward. i just pointed out they don't have to be. that's a mathematical nonsense.

>proof of screenshot of emails
ahahahah okay then you will never learn got it.

John McAfee is Satoshi. If he isn’t I’ll eat my dick.

mcafee lost all my request when he refused to eat his dick. it's a pity he used to be sort of based as a crazy motherfucker. but now basically he is just a shitcoin shilling scammer like richard.

Hahaha

well technically it's
>proof of screenshot of emails printed out then scanned

>10x market cap

So you think a $1 trillion network can be defended against attacks by fees. Let's see how much these fees go up and who's willing to pay them.