Imagine still not having a stack in BSV. At this point, it is highly likely that Craig has the keys from block 2 and 9 (maybe more). I am not saying he owns the keys to all the 1 mio BTC but he certainly has some of the early ones since he privately signed for Gavin, Jon and Ian. It is almost impossible (< 0.0001% probability) for Craig to trick all three of them. If you don‘t know who these people are, check their backgrounds.
With that information in mind, what would happen if Craig publicly signs at some point in the future? Good question user! Lets check some historical data. After Craig got the copyright for the Bitcoin whitepaper granted, the price increased by roughly 500% even though anyone can get that copyright.
If Craig times the public signing correctly, one can expect easily 10x - 20x on his BSV position, maybe even more if the FOMO and the realization starts kicking in hard.
And yes, I put my money where my mouth is. Currently owning more than 200 BSV where I entered almost my complete position size at a $50. This is the ticket to freedom and wealth. Take it or leave it.
Eli Morris
>Jon Matonis
„ Of course, I continued the dialogue with Craig in the months after returning from Sydney and leading up to a private proof session in late March 2016.“
„ I am now pleased to know the creator of the Bitcoin protocol and the author of the Bitcoin white paper, Craig Steven Wright. “
„ During the London proof sessions, I had the opportunity to review the relevant data along three distinct lines: cryptographic, social, and technical. Based on what I witnessed, it is my firm belief that Craig Steven Wright satisfies all three categories. For cryptographic proof in my presence, Craig signed and verified a message using the private key from block #1 newly-generated coins and from block #9 newly-generated coins (the first transaction to Hal Finney). The social evidence, including his unique personality, early emails that I received, and early drafts of the Bitcoin white paper, points to Craig as the creator. I also received satisfactory explanations to my questions about registering the bitcoin.org domain and the various time-of-day postings to the BitcoinTalk forum. Additionally, Craig’s technical working knowledge of public key cryptography, Bitcoin’s addressing system, and proof-of-work consensus in a distributed peer-to-peer environment is very strong. According to me, the proof is conclusive and I have no doubt that Craig Steven Wright is the person behind the Bitcoin technology, Nakamoto consensus, and the Satoshi Nakamoto name.“
Hey Craig, whats your next claim, that you are actually Madonna?
Joshua Kelly
creg is going to kill himself.
Eli Morgan
>Gavin Andresen
„ After spending time with him I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt: Craig Wright is Satoshi.
Part of that time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only Satoshi should possess. But even before I witnessed the keys signed and then verified on a clean computer that could not have been tampered with, I was reasonably certain I was sitting next to the Father of Bitcoin.“
Its such a high quality project that its readily available on many popular exchanges.
Craig Wright is totally Satoshi and not a con and a liar.
Cooper Jackson
Someone who doesn't know what private keys are and how they work cannot be satoshi
Jordan Edwards
Who?
Tyler Butler
Thats it, I am handing you over the most valuable information of your life on a golden plate. If you were too lazy or dumb to research it before on your own, now you have it. Have a nice day and godspeed user.
Gavin also said it was a mistake to call Craig Satoshi.
Oliver Rivera
sirs pls buy satoj virgin veri gud coin and moon
Mason Taylor
Imagine choose to own BSV rather than ETH.
Elijah Evans
He never redacted his statement. Gavin said it was a mistake because certain people (e.g. Creggles) made his life hell after publicly stating that Craig is Satoshi.
Jayden Ward
PLS TO BE BUYING SIRS
Ryder Johnson
you meaning i.e. sir?
Dylan Jenkins
No ranjid its one example of many people. I know it‘s a hard language.
David Jackson
imagine falling for craigs scamcoin
Noah Barnes
>At this point, it is highly likely that Craig has the keys from block 2 and 9 (maybe more)
not really
there are two main ways to fake a satoshi signature 1) signature reuse (a tx signed by satoshi is passed on as "random" message or "satre"). 2) a failure to prove a hash that is verified ina signature belongs to an intelligible and not reused message. because from the public keys anyone can generate a valid signature for random "h(m)" such is the nature of ecdsa.
craig has been caught red handed using both method before.
Jayden Flores
also if you don't believe me: r: 8e01c1fe941d89bbe9d0dca65a47b2f816dd565a0579c257982b9f3e0a96ad26 s: bb010590e060b575eeb09da77287d148966cd232eae619e6ce6227b17e8f58a6 h(m): 6ecae1c5d358f540dfae1d69bbf7bf839fb56804ab2cbe39bee4f13898ef3223
Gavin chose his own message so Craig couldn’t reuse an old one. Additionally, Gavin knows Bitcoin in and out and is a cryptographic expert, so there is no way that Craig tricked him (and the two other cryptographic experts) with such a basic trick.
Nathaniel Hernandez
>Gavin chose his own message so Craig couldn’t reuse an old one. in a controlled environment "replacing" the hash with his choosing is trivial, which is why private signing seances are worthless. unless your signature stands up to scrutiny it's less than worthless it basically a testimony you can't sign properly.
>there is no way that Craig tricked him (and the two other cryptographic experts) with such a basic trick btw that is what conmen do it's the only thing they do incredibly well. and also he did not foul everyone. he got lucky with gavin because he worked him up and gavin wanted to believe and was probably distracted with the whole factory laptop pristine tooling show.
The USB stick was from Gavin and the laptop new and still sealed.
Thomas Lewis
dude it's all bullshit understand this about cryptography! if you can't publish a signature it's fake. and also craig only refused to sign publicly after he failed a couple of times and was caught forging. he would have signed a long time ago f he could his ego wouldn't let him suffer the indignity he suffered.
no. he never had the private keys to any satoshi address. but he is welcome to sign with satoshis pgp key (something he ignores every time it's brought up) if he doesn't want to sign for his wallets.
Joshua Howard
only a pleb would put ice in such fine single malt.
neck yourself.
Adrian Rogers
>that could not have been tampered with
LMAO!! Using your Intel CPU no doubt.
Connor Collins
promises, promises
Bentley Clark
It is highly likely that Craig will either shoot himself or choke on vomit before year's end. Screencap this.
