People who unironically believe that this guy is satoshi should really end themselves RIGHT NOW

so first it is Leroux, then Bilal andnow Adam Back?

user, it is Craig, get over it.

Attached: 1589230863421.png (1400x996, 747.67K)

this

craig is satoshi and will be the next POTUS

youtube.com/watch?v=XfcvX0P1b5g&feature=youtu.be

>discuss

>i mean i understand believing in CSW
lol

Satoshi is either dead of was already a billionaire before he started. Nobody who is alive and not absurdly rich could resist the temptation to cash out at least a little.

What if he lost the keys?

thanks, he is 100% satoshi

>satoshi puts his work on the table
>craig posts obscure threats and wild claims on twitter

>satoshi shares his invention with the world open and free
>craig files multiple patents to troll devs

>satoshi values his privacy
>craig is an attention whore constantly spamming the internet with pictures of homosexual decadence

>satoshi shows and explains
>craig verbally abuses anyone who disagrees

the list could go on indefinitely really. the two of them couldn't have been more different in pretty much every aspect of character.

Basically true

Anyone have the rundown on BSV? I've been gone a while. What was their problem with BCC?

this is a low IQ analysis

what did you expect, that user is a core cuck and is happy paying 3USD fees at the moment to use muh digital gold

Imagine spending $5 on a $2 cup of coffee

it's the observable truth

thatd probably be very convenient... for you

Attached: 439853.jpg (679x679, 50.89K)

>satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/188/
>satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/287/
>satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/318/
they seem pretty aligned to me
also
>comparing how people act anonymously online vs in public
user i...

Anyone who has gone deep down the Satoshi rabbit hole knows that Adam Back isn't even remotely close to being him, but some people have to learn for themselves so I won't stop them

it's shill bullshit

here's an observable truth

>$3 tx fees make BTC unusable as a currency
>Satoshi obviously intended BTC to be a currency

here's another one
>refusing to adjust the block limit, for no good reason, slows tx confirmation time.
>Satoshi explicitly said to raise it as needed
>10 minute transaction time makes BTC unusable as a currency

>satoshi puts his work on the table
Don't even know what this is supposed to mean.

>satoshi shares his invention with the world open and free
He did, and then it was hijacked by blockstream kikes who took control of it and disfigured it beyond recognition. Satoshi would not approve, so if he came back, he would be furious at what they had done and make sure to better protect against subversion of the protocol with patents - wait, exactly what Craig did.

>satoshi values his privacy
He did. And so did Craig. Until it was violated by Gizmodo who outed him in 2014/2015 and started harassing him, his family and his colleagues and forced him to expose himself and go on record. So yes, Satoshi lost his privacy AGAINST his will. Perfectly consistent with Craig, who still says he would prefer being a private person out of the spotlight, studying, building, inventing and doing his work behind the scenes.

>satoshi shows and explains
So does Craig. In fact, I have never seen anyone freely share his knowledge as much as Craig. He has an great blog where he discusses all things Bitcoin and Blockchain, and he has written over 300 articles that cover everything about the cryptography, economics, law, game theory and life. Craig is a teacher and extremely generous with his knowledge

Go here and learn, it's free
craigwright.net/

There is nothing inconsistent with Craig being Satoshi, and the argument about his personality can easily be explained as him getting fed up and losing his patience - which is natural considering the egregious circumstances of what happened to his vision and his lifes' work when the Blockstream fags took over.

So try again.

Attached: craigwrightdotnet.png (1271x501, 416.02K)

at least cashies are obvious
they want big blocks and it gets cultish with CSW

and then you have this cuck who goes >i'm not satoshi ;)))
with bots in comments spamming >thats what a satoj would say!!1

and this is the guy who tells people to stop buying cappuccinos with btc

>i mean i understand believing in CSW

>but this guy has been pissing me off for years and it physically hurts me now when people say he is satoj

>and this is the guy who tells people to stop buying cappuccinos with btc

you are so fucking stupid it's amazing.

Adam Back is cited in the Bitcoin whitepaper, if it wasn't him. It was someone like him. He has a PhD in distributed systems.

A brainlet like you can barely comprehend the most simple of trade offs someone like him makes when designing a network.

The reason he pisses you off is that he makes you feel stupid, the feeling accurately describes your current situation so I guess you'll have to make do with that rotten spongy material between your ears for the rest of your miserable life.

Or you can begin to read and study things so your brain turns from mush into something useful for other people to interact with.

Attached: brainlet.jpg (615x290, 10.42K)

>but this guy has been pissing me off for years and it physically hurts me now when people say he is satoj

lol imagine being this fragile over the real identity of some faggot.

>$3 tx fees make BTC unusable as a currency
not really i pay way worse on my international wires especially on large sums. grasping at straws are you?
>10 minute transaction time makes BTC unusable as a currency
i was 2-3 days on my international wires and getting absolutely raped on fees like a couple of grand.

blahblahblah
just accept it craig never said a true word in his life except when he told his momma he is hungry.

just curious what do you think about his ex wife telling the court under oath that craig never mentioned her bitcoin until he asked her to fraudulently testify to the ato?