Government to purchase 3 billion dollars worth of food for breadlines

You hear that, it seems a central bureaucracy is better at allocating resources than a free market after all. Libertarians btfo.

thehill.com/homenews/administration/496970-trump-says-us-will-purchase-3-billion-in-agricultural-products-from

Attached: 1585090538583.jpg (684x676, 252.09K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=a1ZPmUpKwV4
youtube.com/watch?v=IDxkpH4DlZM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

only 1 bil, why not just print more and buy all the throw away food from farmers

>“Starting early next week, at my order, the USA will be purchasing, from our Farmers, Ranchers & Specialty Crop Growers, 3 Billion Dollars worth of Dairy, Meat & Produce for Food Lines & Kitchens. 'FARMERS TO FAMILY FOOD BOX' Great news for all!" -Trump

Holy mother of based. We love our socialist bailouts don’t we pedes?

>only 1 bil

Wrong, 3 bil.

money is still involved though. your garbage ideology shills a "moneyless society"

lol you because your wrong.

>it’s not socialism when my team does it

MIGA

Mold and mycellium do not have central authority

money still exists in communism. it's just a means of exchange. it has to exist until a central AI computer is put in charge of allocating all the resources accordingly.

>inb4 but it's human nature to want more than others
you'll be shot for that. It's gonna take some time to reprogram people but it must be done. the planet isn't some infinite expanse of resources. it's finite in size and it can't support capitalism long term. the resources must be managed and properly allocated. humans must establish an equilibrium with this planet or they will die.

Boomers only hate socialism because they know they already have their own personal version of it.(Social security/Medicare) Expanding socialism to everyone means the boomers have to take a hit to their standard of living. That's why the speak out so vehemently against it. Irony.

>still no healthcare

Interesting to see what happens with all these people loosing their healthcare because it's employer based.

>seems a central bureaucracy is better at allocating resources than a free market after all
but thats wrong.

Its still socialist

Not if I shoot you back, faggot.

youtube.com/watch?v=a1ZPmUpKwV4

Why would i shoot back? I agree with it.

It's amazing that you ignore the fact that it's a government induced shutdown

You're in luck because the problem will be the exact opposite as we continue to expand government.

A central authority is of course the most efficient for resource allocation. When countries declare war and are threatened with annihilation they mobilise a full planned war economy. They don't wait for the market to sort things out lmao

A system can only go to "thermodynamically" equivalent equilibrium without the imposition of artificial barriers

>the system is so successful that food is plentiful to the extent they have to dump it to stay profitable
How is that bad? In communism you wouldn't have food.

Yeah, keep saying that as you get in line for the bread.

BRRRRRRR

> Libertarians
Modern libertarians: Based
Neolibs: Retards

This is correct and there will need to be barriers. Barriers in the form of one child policies and other breeding control methods. As i stated before. The planet is not infinite in size and neither are the resources that reside within it. Not sure why free market weenies find this FACT so difficult to grasp.

Everyone is already misallocated and over leveraged because central planning and government fuckery. This is only going to make matters worse.

Because given the option most people wouldn't go to war. The resources are taken for someone elses war.

Look up O'neil cylinders, once we get our foothold into space there will be room aplenty for everyone.

youtube.com/watch?v=IDxkpH4DlZM

>This is only going to make matters worse.

You think people starving will be better than breadlines?

There are going to be far more starving in the future as food prices 2x or more in a couple years.