WHO

>admits companies are using Chainlink to boost their credibility and exposure
>nolinkers: this isn't bullish!

It will be worth more than $5MM if you hold long enough. Depends on your idea of “making it”. For me it’s minimally $20MM.

Yeah I have about 3k and its how I see it. I'll sell at 100 bucks and have a nice leg up in future investments. Just remember, LINK won't be the last great thing and it's not Amazon tier. When you've made a LOT, sell and don't look back.

>No linkies call link an ETH shitcoin scam and say it will never spread beyond ETH
>No linkies parrot W H O when literally every emerging network is adopting Chainlink

No linkies are never going to make it

who is that?

Look LINK is an established popular crypto, that much is obvious. But companies partnering with them are just using that as a leg up rather than link having some sort of ground breaking tech.

cope

Attached: Chainlink partners.png (1622x1038, 203.24K)

Hard mode
Swing it into btc for the pump, 2x then swing back to link for the alt pump.

>sell and don't look back.
Imagine killing the goose that lays the golden eggs

I’m an xrp tard. Your literal who partnerships don’t even hit my radar when ripple are partnering with actual countries and the bank of fucking America

The fact that you clearly don't know what chainlink is about and still own some link is beyond me.

you expect them to collaborate on groundbreaking tech before partnering?
kek

Then why are you so salty?

Have you seen how XRP has been performing recently? XRP tards are all salt.

>I’m an xrp tard
Tard is a good description

Attached: F8065E6F-A6E5-4A2F-91B4-76340F8D271F.jpg (921x642, 177.15K)

>it’s not Amazon tier
Yeah, it’s not.

The fact that XRP fags keep coming into Link threads is seriously pathetic. Tether flipped XRP the other day, soon XRP will drop out of the top 3 for good and Chainlink will flip it. Can’t wait.

There's no actual intent to use it though. 99% of crypto projects are total vaporware and a good portion of these intentionally so. They just say they're using link with zero actual plan to ever do so because it gives free exposure.

That's not bullish and if anything hurts link's reputation with things like MOAB and that blockchain RPG game or whatever.

He's absolutely right. 5k LINK won't make it, but if you do happen to sell the top in few years and reinvest smart, you could make it.
20k LINK is the bare minimum make it territory. That will net you about $2-4M in few years time.

How many times do we have to repeat this.... it’s 10k LINK to make it, 1k to prevent suicide. Anything below 1k is normie tier (literally: there are 75k wallets with less than 500 LINK) and anything above 10k is OG linkmarine tier. Between 1 and 10k will help you a lot but you won’t be able to retire. You could live as a NEET for 30 years, not a lifetime; or, you could reinvest, or get heavily into staking. Basically if you have between 1-10k you won’t make it just from LINK gains, but you can still make it with some extra steps, like staking, buying properties, starting a business, etc.

Tl;dr
10k to make it
1k suicide stack (to prevent suicide)
Anything above, below or in between, can be inferred from the above.

>projects using Chainlink purely because it gets them exposure and credibility
>"this is bad"

Thanks for that absolute trenchbrain take.

It has always been 10k to make it. With a mcap equal to XRP, link will be at $60. This is basically inevitable. With a mcap equal to ETH, link will be at something like $300. This isn’t unthinkable, not at all. That’s why it’s 10k to make it: $100 LINK, times 10k, equals $1mil. Sure, you can’t really retire just from that, without any extra steps, but if you can’t make it from $1mil by reinvesting or whatever then you were never gonna make it anyway. So yeah, probably like 20k to make it without any extra steps like reinvestment or staking, but 10k is enough. Anything above 20k is going to be fuck you silly money.

I'll parse the information in a way you can absorb via osmosis and no cognitive work at all: they are not using link, they cheapen link's reputation.

>keep coming into link threads
Every fucking thread on here is a link thread.

I don’t care how xrp has been performing lately, it just gives me the chance to accumulate more. I’m getting impatient but far from salty, like ripple is literally the most obvious buy in this market.

BTC has been hijacked by edgy Gen xers
ETH is jammed up by thousands of shit coins.
XRP is literally the only big cap doing anything remotely positive in the real world. That’s where I look, the price is no concern yet as long as they are making things happen behind the scenes.

>Hurrr tether has surpassed it.
Literally means nothing, wow they printed a bunch of tether and grew their own cap. Zimbabwe currency has probably surpassed a ton of other currency’s aswell.

>no intent to use it

Lol, Sergey has been saying for literal years that Chainlink is the key to make smart contracts actually useful. To take them beyond tokenisation.
You have all these “literal who” projects announcing they’re going to use Chainlink, to do the things beyond tokenization that Sergey was talking about, because they NEED Chainlink to be able to function at all. The only scenario where these projects don’t “really intend” on using Chainlink, would have to be scam projects, with no intention of even trying. No one is saying all of these startups are going to be successful. But there is no way for them to be successful without Chainlink. You cannot build smart contracts connected to external events without Chainlink; all these literal whos are integrating Chainlink because they are trying to do something new and interesting with smart contracts.

Your assertion that they won’t really use Chainlink is a fundamental misunderstanding of how necessary oracles are to push the smart contract space forward.

>Every fucking thread on here is a link thread.
There are far, far more shitcoin threads nowadays.
The only people who complain about “link spam” are people who didn’t buy at 30c and are salty. Fact.

Chainlink is a decentralized middleware. Literally anyone is able to use it.
No matter how scammy or obviously fraudulent the next project claiming to use Chainlink is, it can only ever positiviely impact Link's reputation.

Fortunately we can see the number of jobs run telling us entirely that they aren't actually using link.

If 20k can get you $4M then 5k gets you $1M, wtf you on about?

Nah half the threads are bullshit like ESH, bizcoin, or dxdao, or 69coin, etc

1k is fud. And a million bucks is chump change compared to what crypto can give you. Way to out yourself as a newfag with that post. Why are there so many newfags in link threads today?

Attached: F08DD3C7-A4B8-49FD-8080-849EA5D0FFF8.jpg (2207x1896, 260.06K)

And Tether surpassed XRP because XRP mcap went down. Not because tether printed more.
XRP token is not needed for any of their supposed “real world” application. Unlike LINK, which is fundamental to the system.
XRP will fade into obscurity.

Please stop shitting up link threads. Go post on the Ripple subreddit with the other low IQ normies who actually think it’s going to $300 Kek.

>hurrr there are too many Link threads!!!
And your solution to that is to actually participate in them.
gj

Not really because crypto has a huge reputation problem of being scam projects and pajeetery, which pushes away respectable industry interest and more investors. Someone seeing link partnering with MOAB or ribiero giving his cousin at gravelcoin link will reasonably take it that it's just another scam.

>NOOO a startup that’s a work in progress can’t just announce future integration with Chainlink without IMMEDIATELY integrating it on the same day!

I’ve been all in since 2017, and was one of the original LP crowdsale buyers. Chances are, you’re newer than me. Reasonable price for link is $300 at most in the short term.

>Someone seeing link partnering with MOAB or ribiero giving his cousin at gravelcoin link will reasonably take it that it's just another scam.
Again: ANYONE can partner with Link.
Every single additional partner is good for Link's reputation. Even scammy ones that only do it for the exposure.

Fortunately we've had well over a year of such announcements and can see the number of jobs run.