UBT

The next Link but unironically and with more moonpotential.
>Why?
Because while link probably and undeniably is extremely important to the space, unibrights marketcap is much lower and the team wont sell the tokens like sergey to make money.
imo it could prove to be a much much bigger gainer than link if you get in early enough just for this reason alone.
Add to this that its not on many exchanges and still relatively under the radar combined with the token lockup which reduces supply and we get a recipe for explosive price growth that will leave everything in the dust.
Accept it, this will make early buyers very rich from a few k initially invested.

Attached: PepeOnColor2020.jpg (373x362, 26.26K)

UBT = Next LINK
MITX = Next UBT

If I put $1000 in to UBT now what kind of profits should I expect in 3-4 years?

How does $1,000,000 sound?

Probably 10-13k

I am still not sure if it will outperform link, but the fact that the team holds such a small percentage of the supply is very bullish for this outcome. As someone who got into link in 2018 and made a shit ton off of it I will say that it's hard to know the potential price of any project since crypto is such a weird and new market. What I do know is that I have never failed by investing in companies that focus on business integration in this market and UBT has that covered.

suicide and make it stacks sirs?

Well the bull run will have came to a massive crash, i'd say $1500

what i mean basically is that the many factors coming together here multiply themselves. we have fomo from retailers with low supply, we have companies having to buy from the market too and a token lockup which makes it deflationary. at the same point the team holds not more than a whale stack of ubt and the connections are insane and actually confirmed. it blows my mind how this went undiscovered for so long.

5k

So a token that is not even needed has more moon potential? Delusion.

LINK token = needed
UBT token = not needed and price not important

Attached: 1590145084109.jpg (760x704, 139.65K)

Comparing a decentralized oracle network that 99% of the space is reliant on to a glorified UI is pretty brainlet status user. You then proceeded to bring up the market cap argument which further proves you’re retarded. I have a 20k bag of UBT but I’d be a retard to not be 95%+ LINK. You went full retard on this one chief.

>Link token = needed
If they crack the oracle problem (which boils down to an unsolved computer science problem), it would be huge news in computer science, papers would be written about it, and others can implement a form of the solution without the token. The token is in no way integral to the core problem.

How do you create Sybil resistant guarantees without a collateral function?

Not to mention you completely threw out the network effects kek. I take it you’re one of those guys who invests in projects with “superior tech” but no established network right? You’re probably bullish on shit like NANO too

It already is a bigger gainer. It did twice what chainlink did in a fraction of the time

NOOOOO I GAINED 5K WITH THIS SHITCOIN

Attached: FBED0BC8-4F25-4C65-AE49-7C88472D067E.jpg (1280x532, 69.24K)

64 cents on uniswap we made it boys 1 dollar EOD

30-40m!? you are aiming high brother

-500

-$574

No ones saying link is useless. But link is really big now and the gains are really small compared to UBT. Everytime ubt does a 30x from here that’s like chainlink doing a 2x.

And if you use the total supply or chainlink it’s even worse. It’s like 90x for ubt everytime chainlink does a 2x

i predict this will be around the same ranks in a few months. screencap this.
as always biz wont remember who shilled this shit being called pajeet villagers in every single thread, but some anons still have a brain left, even with all the clever ones already having jumped to link and basically turning into link maximalists.

you are right, im speaking from a ROI point of view only. tech wise and usecase wise its not even close to a match, im fully aware of it. might be getting a little carried away by all the upside UBT has. initially i was just going to dump most of it for more link but its getting pretty nuts.

You’re disregarding the potential market when you talk about market cap though kek, this is my point. The whole “muh market cap” works for traditional settlement layers but you’re talking about agnostic middleware they are all reliant on. Obviously you’re not saying LINK is useless, I’m calling you out for comparing the two target markets and the potential cap that would result.

No way. I have screencapped it. Be happy if UBT is still in the top 100 after the Chico UBT era.

if you want to fud, put in some effort. you are wasting your time fudding with the same argument we had for months.

Why is there always a dichotomy between LINK vs. UBT when they're in the same working groups and in no way competing?

Chainlink is an amazing project. I'm deeply invested in it. Yes, it's the future of decentralised oracles. I also recognise that Unibright has a lot going for it, and it's got some great affiliations and partnerships and real potential going forward.

Why is it always 'us' vs. 'them'? I understand on protocol plays like ETH vs. ADA vs. TRX, but why on two projects that can work together happily without ever clashing?

Just buy both anons, and buy more of the one you like the most. We can be frens.