Are there any good reasons to not be a chainlink maximalist?

are there any good reasons to not be a chainlink maximalist?

Attached: images.jpg (206x245, 5.93K)

1) Sergay betrayed us all
2) we were supposed to be in this together

Zero sum game business plan.

Centralized supply
Easily plagiarized, specially considering there is no network effect
Overcomplicated and relying on a token that will be replaced

if you value your sanity

mommy i want more sergers

Attached: 1590068234278.jpg (572x485, 59.25K)

Its just ripple 2.0

I prefer to gamble on low cap shitcoins

Sergey is a dishonest, greasy charlatan and frog posters are toxic racists.

There's already ETH. Sell me this new coin.

50% owned by the team, yea no thanks pajeet

So much this holy shit. The price we have paid for financial freedom....

Diversity is actually important
Don't be an all in idiot

fucking cringe

There is no need in such technology as chainlink
Nobody will use it with the current or higher price of the token (if anybody even decide to use it) because it will be too expensive
Chainlink doesn't have any business plan about how to make money out of this technology
Sergey owns 35% of the total supply of the tokens
It's already mooned. It's stupid to expect massive gains from the token with a 1.5 billion Mcap. It will just follow the market in the future

Attached: 5445747.jpg (2048x1186, 816.71K)

muh market cap doesn’t matter pajeesh

I asked several times about the advantages of LINK. The only semi-useful answer was: It's a utility token, not cryptocurrency. I still don't get what kind of demands it's going to satisfy in the future.

Yea let me diversify my LINK with some horseshit. Now THAT is investing!

Attached: 1578438953782.gif (746x479, 196.92K)

>Centralized supply
Just means that the interest of the chainlink team are alligned with the interests of Link token holders

>Easily plagiarized, specially considering there is no network effect
Chainlink consists of a large team of developers, technical advisors, partners and intellectual property. And there is a network effect. You manage to copy all of chainlinks existing tech, great. But no oracles are running on your network and someone who wants to run a $1 billion smart contract isn't going to do it on a shady oracle network that started off as a rip off.

Do you know what smart contracts are?

Fucken Gamblers ahhahaha you might make it big on link but real wealth isn't getting rich quick of one asset pump

>you might make it big on link but real wealth isn't getting rich quick of one asset pump
but if you have your money in multiple assets instead and make it just as big, that is real wealth?

More or less. Is Ethereum cooperating with or rivalling Chainlink?

>chainlink maximalist
the ultimate stage of chainsimp turd eating cult

Retard.

So you be saying, it is a centralised controlled decentralised network? Bullish mate

Right around 10 AM east coast time, the chainlink shills come online. Is it the philippians or indonesia that you fuckers get paid to shill. On the weekend too. FBI will fuck you faggots.

Good to see your Sirgay! You realize for all the Indians and shills you've hired, a paperwork of trails and deceptions has been laid? You're going to be fucked harder than that Thernos bitch

Most anons who exemplify disdain towards LINK simply missed out on cheap linkies. Can you imagine how you would feel? For two years some autistic strangers were screaming at them to buy LINK sub $0.2. And guess what? They were right. Can you imagine the pain you would feel knowing what could have been if you simply did your own research and looked more into it? ETH bent the knee, XTZ bent the knee, Microsoft and Ernst Young bent the knee. With every bend, the disdain grows stronger, as the user is further reassured he made a grave mistake not investing.

Ethereum is decentralised platform that enables smart contracts. Chainlink is a decentralised network of oracles that securely connects smart contracts with real world data through API's.