STAKING THIS SHIT
IM MAKING SO MUCH FUCKING MONEY
-95% is acually IM MAKING SO MUCH FUCKING MONEY in reverse??
>he didn’t buy the bottom
For real. Why would somebody buy this at ICO. With zero development done.
Now you buy. Accumulation phase. Mainnet + staking delivered.
We are buying 95% cheaper from the the capitulating weak hand.
Hand over the bags please, so we can make the real money.
I know people seem kind of vested in their thinking. But have you actually done research. Or looked at fundamentals, marketcap or chart.
staking this shit too
the fud in this one is strong thanks guys for the warnings
Nigger not even a 3x will get my money back on this shit.
I unironically dont get the retards here.
Everybody is asking what coin can go 10x.
Now if there is one candidate, where if you as biz community could get in it together, 2017 LINK style. Start staking and take positions. Let the stacks accumulate.
Let the price slowly rise. And then wait for the bullrun and the normies to come in 6m/1y from now.
But no, people want to wait the 6M/1Y themselves and then FOMO join the normies.
Thats why biz is full of poorfags. And the slogan here is buy high, sell low.
I just keep adding to my stack here and there comfy as fuck
You buying early, losing money, doenst make the project bad. All people at some moment buy at overvalued points. Could be BTC, could ONE, could be shitcoin.
Problem is, people then sell low, then buy another coin from somebody else, who felt bad their project went down. So now all people start venting their frustrations of their losses, on the companies, while the real LT winning investors. Own their own mistake in buying at overvalued position. And start to learn how to recognize value and buying opportunity.
Like what fundamentals to look at.
Basic chart patterns.
Current price vs ICO.
Overall market sensiment next 6M
Have deliveries been made.
Is it VC backed. Implying, serious due diligence has happened.
I understand that you're shilling but I know exactly why the price went down: delays and getting hid of ETAs. The devs just don't seem professional in this project, maybe the CEOs, but the rest definitely aren't.
I have looked into dev leaving. I agree. Attrition is point of attention. Though from having worked with start ups. There could be many reasons. Some People underperform. Some get better job offers. Loads of companies have Corona layoffs now.
So, I check
coincodecap.com
See how development velocity is. Go there. Select last 3m. And they are number one! So, whoever is there, is coding. And This week still top 3.
I am not saying this is perfect project. Not at all. And i understand being down on paper is shit. But they have delivered a good functioning system.
While i am still waiting on Cardano and Ethereum to finally release.
You fools will never get it. 99% of this market is investing in different settlement layers that tout “superior tech”. All settlement layers are reliant on Chainlink if they wish to make it past tokenization. If you think this is false, name a viable alternative. You’re investing in particular car brands when some of us are smart enough to o recognize they are all reliant on the same fuel. Good luck, you’re doing to need it.
I agree. Even Tezos and Cardano work with Link. But link is a 1,3B marketcap project. So for current new investor. Link 2020, is not Link 2017.
And if i want safe investment, might aswell take ETH or BTC. And after bullrun move funds in LINK.
For now, I am curious what positions to take of small caps that have phenomenal potential in coming bullrun.
No, I get it. But it’s an issue of timing. Chainlink is literally the last step in decentralization phase. It’s not going to be used until 5+ years from now. Sure there will be speculative pumps, but you’re missing out on other msssive moon missions waiting
PS: chainlink will be porting native token functionality to harmony
AN ACTUAL SCAM THAT NEEDS TO BE PROMOTED ON BIZ TO GET A FEW BRAINLETS INTO BUYING IT.
AND THEY DARE TO CALL IT ETH2.0 .. THE FUCKING AUDACITY
whoever puts their hard earned money into this shit, deserves what's coming to them.
t. bought at 240 sats, 168, and 110.
>PS: chainlink will be porting native token functionality to harmony
>chainlink will be porting native token functionality to harmony
Do you know what this means in reality? “Porting” is Harmony Ones fancy way of saying external adaptor. There are thousands of external adaptors for Chainlink, there is even one for paypal. The purpose is that the user on the front end isn’t aware they are using Chainlink when an adaptor is used, this is why LINK devs were brilliant. They realized enterprises don’t want to transact in crypto yet, they’d rather use fiat with ISO20022 reporting standards. The final collateral and node payment is always made in LINK though. “Porting” for Harmony is no different than any other external adaptor kek, the front end user makes their payment in ONE tokens, the service level agreement (SLA) takes the predefined terms established by both parties, converts the ONE to LINK within the SLA then satisfies the service level requestors request. If the data is within the parameters defined in the SLA, node operator gets paid his LINK and his LINK collateral is released. I suggest you google “Chainlink external adaptors” and start there.
>if i want safe investment, might as well take ETH
You realize ETH is reliant on Chainlink now right. This is the equivalent of someone saying “if I want a safe investment I’ll buy Mercedes or BMW rather than the fuel they are both dependent on”.
No, you’re wrong idiot. Chainlink team them self said they will create a bridge for tokens to the harmony chain.
Oh and btw, until some smart contract protocol scales properly, chainlink will be useless
We talking about different things.
My question is. Why would LINK go 10x faster than ONE. Let alone that I earn money in staking ONE as i write this.
The bridge is the external adaptor kek, I just explained it all to you and your rebuttal was “no you’re wrong idiot” kek. And ETH scaling via ETH2.0 is irrelevant user, tell me you’re aware of the functional layer 2 scaling solution created by the former CTO to the White House? Genuine question and I don’t mean for it to sound condescending but are you new to crypto?
now get on your knees and suck my cock
i bet you have never written a program in your life
read the post above and then swallow a frisbee
Because ONE is literally one of thousands of settlement layers out there. You’re returns are contingent upon either speculation or adoption to your settlement layer. LINK is middleware that works with any settlement layers, it doesn’t matter what layer succeeds because they are all reliant on LINK. Look at the network usage...it’s evident there are no alternatives to LINK at this point.
Listen dumbass, I agree long term that link will be the most valuable. But you need to look down at your feet first, not at the stars. No real adoption or moon mission will occur before other crypto’s do multiple 10x’s or 100x’s: chainlink is USELESS without a properly scaling trasnfer layer for the token itself
You’re a moonbitch that bought post coinbase with r*fdit. Please get the fuck off my board
What does the bottom left box say? Something about the LINK token still be used? Oh yeah, the SLA part I had mentioned above. I wouldn’t expect a ONE maxi to understand though. Sorry the “timing” was wrong and you missed LINK kek. Coping like this is unhealthy though.
And everything you write is priced into LINK. The amount of money that needs to flow into link to go to 13B marketcap is huge. Amount of money to make ONE into 200M is negligent.
Link is already moving around its ATH. A Harmony 10X would bring it just above its ATH.
I just told you about Arbitrum kek, you are incredibly uninformed and/or new to the space. You’re showing your true colors user. Here read about it from the former White House Chief Technology Officer.
SLA is literally never mentioned in the image
Good thing You really are clueless aren’t you lmao
>LINK
LINK is a complete vaporware shitcoin that truly is useless. Anyone, and I do mean anyone, can implement what LINK does into literally any shitcoin. Go back to jerking it to feminized pics of Sergay faggot.
Because the ONE community wouldn’t understand what it means lmao. You’re talking to room temp IQ investors user, the same investors that flock to every project these days (not exclusive to ONE), think about it from their marketing standpoint. Does it make more sense to tell people “we will utilize an external adaptor so the front end user can use ONE for node payment but actual collateral/payment to operator will be settled via LINK token following the predefined terms established in the SLA” or does it sound better to say something like “you can pay LINK node operators with ONE using porting”! Take a step back and look at the big picture user
That is your investment argument. Muh LINK.
You realize how stuck you are in your head. The question is, can you earn more Link by finding projects that will 10x faster.
Did you just glance over everything else I stated and only read that?