CEO OF BASED FOUND ON TWITTER

Based

I tend to believe him

90% of Marines are in profit, the only sell pressure is artificial to keep you out of their club.

I'll say this once more. Get 10k link, then hold it til 2026. Welcome to the financial elite user, we've been waiting for you

Attached: EYu6XQOU4AAVD1e.jpg (1440x910, 103.3K)

Aaand just like that there is no fud left. Everyone on suicide watch beside stinkies.

Attached: comfy.gif (768x432, 3.59M)

where are the seething nolinkers and swingers? i'm waiting

you wahn zi zoom akshin mr. mcdonnell?

>*bzzzt bzzzt*
>YIS?
>POOMPEE
>*click* *radio geigercounter static*

Attached: POOMPEEDOOMPEECSHANLEENK.jpg (1280x640, 226.32K)

linkies cannot hence why they retort to memes and simple 1 word answers, primarily because they can’t even comprehend how chainlink works or what it can or might do. I can tell you everything, it legitimately does nothing because it’s vaporware.
No partnerships
Down over 50% from all time high
Stale overused memes
Shitty fantasy LARP threads
Shitty insider LARP threads
No real world applications
Built off a platform created by an admitted pedophile who wore a furry costume to a developer conference
Staking never coming

Attached: 1568353807411.png (830x668, 411.88K)

Reasons why Link will fail

1. Zero customers, zero need. No one is going to pay for information to be inserted into a smart contract. That's what an oracle is supposed to do. The problem is a x100 calls costs a x100 times whatever Link charges. If you have to make thousands of calls, that's hundreds of dollars in Link tokens. If I were a dev, it would be much simpler to just make my own call to whatever data I needed.

2. Zero development, all marketing. Link has hired shills, link started on biz and Sergey himself got the inspiration to post, network with and contact people on biz. That's why begging is not allowed on biz, because after link a lot of other tokens tried to copy them. There's a lot of disingenuous shills saying that Link was only made for business cases and biz was never supposed to discover it. Quite the opposite, it was made first as a marketing token.

3. Deceitful. The Link team lies continuously; they'll attend a conference (SIBOS) and say they're partnered with Swift which is a banking protocol that handles these bank conferences, implying that they're going to handle data for big banks. They contacted the Google dev to make an offical blogpost and thus said that they're "partnered" when in fact, it's just a mention. They stretch the truth.

4. Zero transparency. Link raised 32 million in it's ICO. Since then, we have no accounting of their funds. They market dumped twenty to thirty million worth of chainlink (we still don't know the full amount) and never said a word about it. They're still dumping here and there, even larger amounts and believe they are free to do so at any time.

5. Cult-like behavior. 90% of the memes made by Chainlink pose Sergey as this kind of messiah. They encourage zero compromise grounds that anyone should sell their token. They encourage people to buy their tokens despite; mortgages, spousal issues and even when their "investors" are homeless they'll encourage people to buy more.

Attached: 1563559662715.webm (480x600, 1.11M)

Why did you remove 0 customers from that?

Yeah, I want chainlink gone. It's not organic and it's self-driven by poor suicidal, mentally under-developed NEETs throwing every dollar they have at some magical pie in the sky token with no verifiable use, no possible solution to an imaginary non-problem, proven scam on the internet with research and shady marketing history as well as shady market dumping history. The level of collusion with this token combined with the inexperience of the team and total unprofessionalism makes it a no brianer for anyone.

It's all fake. All the partnerships, all that bullshit, a wink and a nudge. It's the google cloud thing all over again, it's just one developer who probably bought some LINK bags acting like the whole fucking enterprise is going to make use of LINK. There is literally nothing to indicate that SWIFT is going to integrate LINK into their system. It's just one random company presenting some shiny new technology that'll eventually go nowhere. Big fat nothingburger and now the LINK shills are out in full force acting like they all made it, because they are trying to pump their bags off of the hype.
Once the dust settles it'll be glaringly obvious. It's all fake. In fact, if you google chainlink you'll see it's just a scam. Please reddit don't get duped into this. Don't buy this, DYOR, google it and you'll see what I'm talking about. Remember the google cloud thing, it's fake. Just check its price after the pump-and-dump from that news and you'll know what I'm talking about

Attached: LINKSCAM.png (3500x762, 148.65K)

Chris was talking about the article Brian had posted, not Chainlink itself.
Brian is still based though and it’s good to hear that Chainlink has paying customers.

yaaaaaaaawwwwwwnnn
not enough

Attached: 0369D812-CB81-465C-B677-0025FF29EAA1.jpg (332x719, 32.32K)

so are they buying LINK OTC or what?

Nice a booth whore, i totally sold my dude.

What, the article that Kava posted on why they selected Chainlink?

how are they paying, precisely?

>94
>34
Welcome aboard but holy shit am I glad I bought pre-mainnet

those arn't linklets anymore, those are microlets

When did biz start fudding link? 1$?2$3$? Where was I when we agreed too this? Everyone knows biz is and always has been a chainlink board oh my bad just got a txt from user ya um link sucks don’t buy it and if u already bought it sell it

Attached: 76DC9C68-401F-4BA9-A8CE-C1FADE23E2FD.gif (258x536, 1.6M)

we are sick of seeing low-effort meme posts
>WTF WAS THAT
>actual insider here
>everyone is selling BTC to convert to their favored coin of choice
>sergey memes
>faggot marines FUDDING each and every other single coin being talked about

their hubris will be their downfall

What hubris didn’t u get the memo? We going to 1k eoy stop lying man we both know u got 50k

vaporware like any shitcoin

Attached: sergey.jpg (752x1000, 91K)