Oh my

>10MB record transaction size shows what’s possible on Bitcoin

>Bitcoin has been breaking more records—the last 48 hours has seen two of the largest transactions ever processed. The two transactions, which saw two high-definition photos recorded forever on the Bitcoin SV (BSV) blockchain, were 5.8MB and 9.74MB.

>Those size figures are for single transactions, not blocks. Not so long ago, even blocks of that size would’ve made headlines.

coingeek.com/10mb-record-transaction-size-shows-whats-possible-on-bitcoin/

Attached: DtBkvFAXgAEovEO.png (1000x1000, 58K)

How do I immortalize Goatse on there? Someone needs to tell me..

Fake

So what happens if someone puts cp on the chain ?

the same thing when someone uploads it to dropbox or facebook?

>Though these two transactions demonstrate Bitcoin’s technical capabilities, it’s probably not a great idea to try uploading high-def images to the blockchain en masse, at least in single transactions. You can still do this using a service that spreads the image over several transactions or compresses the image (BitPaste, Twetch, Weiblock, to name a few).

If you wouldn't mind, go ahead and upload this pic also

Attached: EPFRAJgX0AASle2.jpg (680x510, 83.46K)

not exactly the same, because dropbox or facebook can take it down.

Leave this board in shame, BSVjeets. Go.

there's literally tons of it already on bsv. anyone who download the bsv full node could technically be put in prison given the right legal argument.
stay away from it.

kinda, large industrial nodes/miners are vulnerable to law, they will be forced to obscure and report access to universally illegal content and pass every crumb of evidence onto law enforcement
similarly how a lot of isps in the west block piratebay and other torrent sharing sites

This

Then the authorities can close the 5 terrabyte centralized nodes that bsv glowies financed.

The answer bsv shills give to this is that they will be able to police the blocckhain by seizing illegal coins.

The whole thing is a glowie operation to seize the blockchain, which is why they faking faketoshi to steal the btc name so they can replace it with a policed chain to "remove cp" (which they allowed to be there in the first place).

Attached: 1587901816014.jpg (1280x720, 104.63K)

Bsv is pure cope because they too poor to buy bitcoin

No such thing as being too poor to buy BTC, it's more about buying the real Bitcoin that has a future.

>report access
do you even know how blockchains work?

also even if you ban thepireatebay dht still works just fine and clients can encrypt communication for torrent. it's impossible to censor it.

Do you understand how blockchains even work ? And even if we were to assume that miners "check" the content of transactions are they really legally vulnerable for including it in the block ? What I'm trying to get at is that this is something that is a legal risk that could take down the entire chain if someone really went all in on it. Imagine BSV being in the news for decentralized cp storage, it would put the entire chain out of commission if the cp was in a somewhat old block not to mention that it would wreck any confidence in the BSV brand and "idea".

>Do you understand how blockchains even work ?

Immediately shows he doesn't understand either, you don't have to store the content you retard, just the hash. Bunch of fake intellectuals all over this board.

Lmao, so this is how stupid BSV shills are. Here's how you do it:
- base64 encode the cp
- split the result into 20-byte strings
- think of some eol marker for the chunk file array
- base58 encode the chunks and use them as TxOut addresses
- assemble a transaction with valuable enough TxIn for each TxOut to circumvent dust triggers
- Now there's literally cp on your chain and since BSV has such a large blocksize you could potentially get away with a small video if you are creative enough.
Good luck sv cuck.

Except what you just described is possible on BTC too, what's your point exactly?

Price? You think it being more expensive on one chain somehow makes the law or liability any different?

A legit retard.

Hurrr, I'm going to make a bunch of Visa charges with varrying amounts of cents that's actually base 100 encoded CHILD PORN AHHRHHHAHA and the banks have to legally store it for 7 years because of banking regulation! I TOTALLY BEAT THE SYSTEM AND IM STORING CP!!!!!!

Government is going to come in and shut down Bank of America guys, it's all over!

The point is that since altcoins are a centralized clusterfuck, particularly BSV which aims to have datacenters running nodes, once CP is on the blockchain authorities can proceed to knock on said datacenters and rekt your entire shitcoin as only datacenters are keeping records of the blockchain instead of individuals..

Attached: 1589480637835.png (209x272, 146.84K)

You unironically think that BTC is being secured by 1000s of individuals and not a few miners operating in datacenters?

Do you buy into the raspberry pi meme?

You sweet summer child

well here is the thing in a validating network of nodes the miners can't change the rules. their blocks would be invalid and invisible.

in a network where only a few nodes validate and also mine and the rest of the network depends on them for confirmation the majority of the miners can change the rules undo transactions spend without signatures etc... you don't have the capability to keep them in check or even audit them.

it's a simple difference but important. so long the nodes validate the blockchain in full honest nodes are isolated from dishonest actors in multitude of ways.

.Only that Visa does not permanently store these things in an, by defintion, immutable public ledger that is downloaded whenver someone needs to validate the chain.
Calm down Craig, I won't do it but you also obviously have no idea about how any of this stuff woirs, be it just the technical aspects of it or the implications of it. Keep increasing that blocksize and keep being the faggot you are, you'll need it in prison.

Calvin Ayre isn't too poor.
Why did he chose $BSV
Have a deep think!!!

So, basically you are saying you have no response to the fact that it can be done on BTC as well. Got it

I would like to explore that cognitive dissonance that exist among the core people:

how exactly do raspberrie pi´s prevent miners in majority from "changing" rules? lets say 99%of miners mine a chain that the devs/raspi "validators" deem as heretic, what would you do against it. you can say no, that is ot the good one, but who would be adding blocks to your "correct" chain, since only miners add blocks.

can be done on btc but you would be paying out the ass and it would not be easily accessible like on bchsv where you an literally upload it to op_return data.

>how exactly do raspberrie pi´s prevent miners in majority from "changing" rules?
easily, your raspberry pie does not see any blocks or any transactions made under invalid rules. simply the shared reality of validating nodes ignore any attempt at bending the rules like it never happened.

>Sweet summerchild
I know nothing of this conversation but holy fuck do I genuinely hope you're a s retarded as you sound and wrong. Fucking reddit cancer.

>but who would be adding blocks to your "correct" chain
any miner that want's to actually spend his reward... see the incentive for a miner to defect the rule breakers is high and easy. exchanges also run their own validating nodes and they also ignore the blocks made by a rogue majority.

mining invalid blocks is a huge zero sum game.

Way to completely ignore
>Price? You think it being more expensive on one chain somehow makes the law or liability any different?

You know you're wrong so you keep trying to cherry pick and ignore parts of the statement. Get fucked you retard

no you can do it but nobody will see it and you pay out of the ass. same as if you hide cp via steanography in a tv commercial.

what if 100%of miners move to the "invalid" rules, who is putting transactions into blocks in the raspi "correct" chain?